Fatigue in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

December 15, 2024 updated by: Zülal TATAR, Pamukkale University

Fatigue in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Which Variables Play a Role?

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of biopsychosocial status, quality of life, functional status and hematological markers on fatigue in individuals with SLE.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Denizli, Turkey
        • Pamukkale University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will include individuals aged 18 and older who are receiving treatment for SLE at a university hospital in Turkey, and meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with SLE according to the 2019 ACR/EULAR diagnostic criteria
  • Being 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not being able to speak or understand Turkish fluently
  • Having a psychiatric illness that will affect cooperation
  • Heart failure or lung pathology that will affect daily life activities
  • Additional autoimmune disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue Assesment Scale
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
It is a scale consisting 10 items. The maximum score is 50. High score indicates high fatigue.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
FACIT Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
It is scale consisting 13 items. Scores range from 0-52. High score indicates low fatigue
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach-Biopsychosocial Questionnaire (BETY-BQ)
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
It is a scale consist of 30 items. Scores range from 0-120. Higher scores indicate worse biopsychosocial status.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
The SF-36 consists of two dimensions, generating a profile of health-related quality of life.These dimensions are: physical health and mental health. Higher scores indicate better health.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (HAQ)
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
The scale consists of 20 questions and includes 8 activities. The total score is obtained by summing the points earned from 8 activities and then dividing that sum by 8. Higher scores indicate worse functional status
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Routine blood test results
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Participants' routine blood test results such as neutrophil (NEU (K/uL)) , monocyte (MONO (K/uL)), eosinophil (EO (K/uL)), leukocyte (WBC (K/uL)), lymphocyte (LYM (K/uL)), platelet (PLT (K/uL)) will be recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Routine Blood Test Results
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Participants' routine blood test results such as calcium (Ca (mg/dL)), creatinine (mg/dL), c-reactive protein (CRP (mg/L)), uric acid (mg/dL) will be recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Routine Blood Test Results
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
The participants' rutin blood test such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST IU/L), alanine aminotransferase (ALT IU/L) will be recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Hematological indices
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR), monocyte/lymphocyte (MLR), platelet/lymphocyte (PLR), platelet*neutrophil/lymphocyte (systemic inflammatory index), monocyte/platelet (MTO), neutrophil*monocyte/lymphocyte (systemic inflammatory response index), neutrophil*monocyte*platelet/lymphocyte (systemic inflammation aggregate index) obtained from complete blood counts will be calculated and recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Routine Blood Test Results
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Procolcytonin (PCT (%)), erythrocyte distribution width (RDW (%)), platelet distribution width (PDW (%)) levels will be recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Routine Blood Test Results
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Erythrocyte distribution width standard deviation (RDW-SD (fL)) will be recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Routine Blood Test Results
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
C3 complement (g/L) and C4 complement (g/L) levels will be recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Routine Blood Test Results
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Blood urea nitrogen (BUN (mg/dL)) levels will be recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Routine Blood Test Results
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.
Sedimentation (mm/h) will be recorded.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 6 months, which is the study period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Subscribe