Optical Brain Pulse Monitor: Validation Of Cerebral Oximetry Monitoring (OBPM:VOCOM) Study. (OBPM:VOCOM)

June 10, 2025 updated by: Elliot Teo

Optical Brain Pulse Monitor: Validation Of Cerebral Oximetry Monitoring (OBPM: VOCOM) Study.

The purpose of this study is to calibrate and validate a cerebral oximeter product from Cyban Pty. Ltd. The study will involve comparing cerebral oximeter signals against reference arterial and jugular bulb blood gas measures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of the study is to measure the absolute and relative accuracy of the StO2 device by comparing the NIRS-derived brain tissue oxygen saturation with blood-referenced CO-oximeter oxygen saturation values. The CO-oximeter oxygen saturation values from paired arterial and jugular bulb blood samples are combined into a weighted-equation to derive the reference SavO2. Accuracy is reported over a range of oxygen saturations with study subjects exposed to a controlled oxygen desaturation with serial sampling of paired arterial and internal jugular venous blood gas samples.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy, male or female subjects between the ages of 18 to 45 years;
  • Completion of a health screening for a medical history by a licensed physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant;
  • Minimum weight 40kg;
  • BMI within range 18.0 - 35.0;
  • Assigned American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status 1 by Principal Investigator or delegate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior or known allergies to lidocaine (or similar pharmacologic agents, e.g., Novocain) [self- reported];
  • Prior known severe allergies to medical grade adhesive/tape (Band-Aid) [self-reported];
  • Taking any medication other than birth control[self-reported];
  • Is currently participating in, or has recently participated in (discontinued within 30 days prior to the hypoxia procedure for this study) in an investigational drug, device, or biologic study [self- reported];
  • Has a negative Allen's Test to confirm non-patency of the collateral artery [clinical assessment by PI or delegate];
  • Has made a whole blood donation or has had at least 450 ml of blood drawn within 8 weeks prior to the study procedure [self-reported];
  • Is female with a positive pregnancy test [serum or urine], or is female and is unwilling to use effective birth control between the time of screening and study procedure or is breast feeding;
  • Has anemia [lab values specific for gender];
  • Has heparin allergy
  • Has a history of sickle cell trait or thalassemia [self-reported];
  • Has an abnormal hemoglobin electrophoresis result [lab measurement];
  • Has a positive urine cotinine test or urine drug screen or oral ethanol test;
  • Has a room air saturation less than 95% by pulse oximetry [measurement by PI or delegate]
  • Has a clinically significant abnormal EKG [assessment by PI or delegate];
  • Has a clinically significant abnormal pulmonary function test via spirometry [assessment by PI or delegate];
  • Has a COHb greater than 3%, or MetHb greater than 2% [measured by venous blood sample co- oximetry].
  • Students and Employees under the direct supervision of PI or Sub-I.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Desaturation
A central venous catheter will be placed in the right internal jugular vein and the catheter tip advanced retrograde to lie at the level of the jugular bulb. An arterial catheter will be placed in the forearm. A dedicated breathing circuit will be used to reduce the alveolar oxygen tension (PAO2) in stepwise fashion to produce a controlled oxygen desaturation sequence. The dedicated breathing circuit will be used to maintain the alveolar carbon dioxide tension (PACO2) at normocapnic value of 40 mmHg. At each step once steady state conditions are achieved, serial paired arterial and jugular bulb venous samples will be drawn. The blood gas samples will be analyzed by Radiometer ABL90 Flex CO-oximeter.

The subject will undergo a graduated desaturation procedure. Arterial saturation targets are as follows:

  1. 100%
  2. 99%
  3. 96%
  4. 93%
  5. 90%
  6. 87%
  7. 84%
  8. 81%
  9. 78%
  10. 75%
  11. 72%
  12. 69%
  13. 99%
Each subject will be continuously monitored with the cerebral oximetry device throughout the desaturation procedure.
At each arterial saturation plateau venous and arterial blood gas measurements will be taken from the jugular bulb, and the radial artery respectively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy by Average Root Mean Squared Error
Time Frame: 6 months
The Accuracy by Root Mean Square Difference (ARMS) will be used to evaluate accuracy of the investigational device StO2 compared with the blood-referenced SavO2
6 months
Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis
Time Frame: 6 months

A Bland-Altman (BA) analysis will be conducted on the difference (D) and mean (A) of StO2, SavO2, where

  • D = StO2 - SavO2
  • A = (StO2 + SavO2) / 2

The following statistics will be presented:

  • Bias and its 95% confidence interval (CI)
  • Standard deviation of bias (sum of between and within subject variance components)
  • Lower and upper 95% limit of agreement (LoA) and their 95% CI
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance Correlation Coefficient
Time Frame: 6 months
The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) method is used to measure the agreement between of two devices. CCC could have values from -1 to 1, with values near 1 indicating strong concordance between the two devices, values near -1 indicating strong discordance, and values near zero indicating no concordance.
6 months
Passing-Bablok Regression Analysis
Time Frame: 6 months
Passing-Bablok regression is used to compare measurements from different devices, and is a robust nonparametric regression method that does not make assumptions about the distribution of the expected values or the error terms in the model. The 95% CI for the intercept and slope will be estimated from the regression.
6 months
Linear Mixed Model Regression Analysis
Time Frame: 6 months
A random effects linear mixed model will be used to regress StO2 on SavO2. Subject will be included as a random effect in the model to account for the correlation of repeated measures within the same subject.
6 months
Subgroup Analysis of Agreement
Time Frame: 6 months

Bland-Altman analyses will be generated for subgroups to assess the two device agreement among different subgroups. A forest plot will used to present the results. The following subgroups will be considered.

  • Restricted oxygen desaturation range: 50% ≤ reference SavO2 ≤ 75%
  • Oxygen desaturation steps as measured by SpO2 (13 steps)
  • Fitzpatrick score group
  • Sex
  • Race
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Analyses
Time Frame: 6 months

All safety analyses will be conducted on the Safety Population. No inferential statistical testing will be performed for safety variables.

Any reported adverse events, safety observations, and adverse device deficiencies will be listed in a separate by participant data listing.

6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David B Macleod, M.B.B.S, Human Pharmacology and Physiology Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00116391

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share individual participant data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe