- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06672887
Enhancing Successful Return to Work of Employees With Cancer, by Supporting Employers (MiLES Intervention) (MiLES)
Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Return on Investment of the Web-based MiLES Intervention Targeted at Employers, to Enhance Successful Return to Work of Employees With Cancer
The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention targeted at employers, on successful return to work (RTW) of employees with cancer, compared to care as usual (CAU).
Secundary objectives are:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and return-on-investment of the MiLES intervention on successful RTW and quality of life, compared to CAU.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention on several outcome measures on the level of the employee with cancer (time to RTW, quality of life, quality of working life, received work-related support, and satisfaction with work-related support), and the level of the employer (self-efficacy in providing RTW support, and satisfaction with the RTW process).
Participants will be 140 employer-employee with cancer dyads. All dyads will randomly be allocated to the intervention group, of which the employer will get unlimited access to the MiLES intervention, or to the control group in which CAU will be provided. The follow-up of this study will be 12 months.
Along with the RCT, a process evaluation using the UK Medical Research Council framework will also be conducted.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The investigators will include 140 employer-employees with cancer dyads. The employees are diagnosed with cancer (<2 years earlier), aged 18-65 years, in paid employment with an employer, and currently fully or partly sick-listed (<2 years). The employer supports and guides the participating employee with cancer during the period of sick leave and RTW (e.g. as the direct supervisor or HR-manager).
Employers of dyads randomized to the intervention group will get unlimited access to the web-based MiLES intervention, aimed at enhancing the successful RTW of employees with cancer, by supporting employers. This intervention includes among others interactive video's, conversation checklists, and tips and information. Employers of dyads randomized to the control group will not get access to the MiLES intervention, thus dyads will get care as usual.
The primary outcome will be successful RTW, measured at the level of the employee. Secondary outcomes will include: current work situation (including time to RTW), quality of life and quality of working life, received work-related support, and satisfaction with work-related support. At the level of the employer, the secondary outcomes will include: self-efficacy in providing RTW support, and satisfaction with the RTW process. All outcomes will be assessed using questionnaires at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Both the cost-effectiveness and the return on investment analysis will be conducted from the employers perspective. For the process evaluation, the UK MRC framework will be used.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Judith Mollet, MSc
- Phone Number: +31205669111
- Email: milesonderzoek@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Michiel Greidanus, PhD
- Phone Number: +31205669111
- Email: m.a.greidanus@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Arnhem, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Arbo Unie
-
Dordrecht, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Arbo Unie
-
Hengelo, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Arbo Unie
-
Utrecht, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Re-turn
-
Zeeland, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Arbo Unie
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria employees with cancer:
- Diagnosed with cancer <2 years earlier;
- Being of working age (between 18-65 years, considering the Dutch retirement age of 67 years, and the study's follow-up period of one year);
- In paid employment with an employer;
- Having either an occupational physician at the involved occupational health service or a reintegration consultant at the involved reintegration service (e.g. working for an organization that is affiliated with one of the settings of this study);
- Currently fully or partly sick-listed (<2 years);
- Able to understand and read Dutch for filling out questionnaires;
- Having already informed their employer about their diagnosis of cancer, or intending to do so;
- Not yet applied or planning to apply for an invalidity benefit under the WIA.
Inclusion criteria employers:
- Supports and guides the participating employee with cancer during the period of sick leave and RTW. For example, as the direct supervisor or HR-manager;
- Able to understand and read Dutch to be able to use the MiLES intervention and for filling out questionnaires;
- Not yet familiar with the MiLES intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Employees with cancer and their employers must participate as a dyad. If one party in the dyad is unable or unwilling to participate, the other party cannot participate either.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Employers randomized to the intervention group will get a personal link to the MiLES intervention.
|
The MiLES intervention is an open access website, accessible via an URL, but not traceable through any online search engine during the study period.
Tailored for specific preferences and needs of different employees with cancer, the MiLES intervention consists of interactive videos, conversation checklists, tips and information regarding RTW guidance of employees with cancer, and an overview of involved stakeholders and relevant legislation.
The MiLES intervention intends to optimize the RTW support the employer provides to the employee with cancer by enhancing the willingness and ability to implement the employer actions.
The MiLES intervention focuses for example on fostering effective communication between the employer and employee, while disregarding assumptions based on previous experiences.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
The employees randomized to the control group will receive "care as usual" from their employer, as well as from their reintegration consultant or occupational physician.
Their employer will not have access to the MiLES intervention during the study period.
However, they will gain access for 6 months following a waiting-list period of 12 months.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful return to work (employee with cancer)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
The primary effect measure "successful RTW" is a combination of two components:
The I-RTW_CS is specifically developed as an RTW outcome measure that represents the perspectives of employees with cancer, with items that could be influenced by an employer. |
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Current work situation (employee with cancer)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
Employees who have resumed work will be asked about their current work situation and since when they have returned to work (fully or partially).
The questionnaire is self-developed and includes 9 items (e.g.
time to RTW).
|
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
|
Quality of life (employee with cancer)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
The SF-12 questionnaire will be used to measure the perceived impact of health on a participant's everyday life (12 items).
|
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
|
Received work-related support from the employer (employee with cancer)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
Measured using self-developed questions, including the frequency of contact and its average duration (4-items).
|
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
|
Satisfaction with work-related support from their employer (employee with cancer)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
Measured on a self-developed 5-point Likert scale (1 item).
|
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
|
Quality of working life (employee with cancer)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
The Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS) will be used to measure the experiences and perceptions at work over the past 4 weeks of employees who have resumed work.
|
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
|
Self-efficacy in providing return to work support (employer)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
Measured using an adapted version of the Competence scale of empowerment questionnaire (4 items).
|
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
|
Satisfaction with RTW process (employer)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
Measured on a self-developed 5-point Likert scale (1 item).
|
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost-effectiveness and return on investment
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
The cost-effectiveness analysis and the return on investment analysis will be conducted from the employer's perspective, comparing the MiLES intervention with care as usual.
They will be conducted for the primary outcome measure (i.e.
successful RTW) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
|
From enrollment to the end of the 12-month follow-up.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sietske Tamminga, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023.0524
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cancer
-
Cellworks Group Inc.RecruitingCancer | Relapsed Cancer | Refractory CancerUnited States
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterCompletedCancer Liver | Cancer Brain | Cancer Head &Neck | Cancer PelvisUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); The Glimpse Group IncRecruitingCancer | Adolescent Cancer | Young Adult CancerUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Atrium Health Wake Forest BaptistRecruitingCancer | Adolescent Cancer | Young Adult CancerUnited States
-
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAdvanced Cancer | Relapsed Cancer | Refractory CancerUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIC Gastric... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityNot yet recruitingCancer | Solid Cancer
-
New Mexico Cancer Research AllianceOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center...RecruitingCancer | Cancer RiskUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaCompletedCancer | Childhood CancerUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoBristol-Myers Squibb; PfizerTerminatedStage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic Colon Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIIA Colon Cancer | Stage IIIB Colon Cancer | Stage IIIC Colon Cancer | Stage IV Colon Cancer | Stage IV Rectal... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on MiLES
-
Zhang RuiRecruitingRectal Cancer | Surgery | Almost-cCRChina
-
University of Texas at AustinActive, not recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalNational Cancer Center, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Seoul... and other collaboratorsCompletedRectal CancerKorea, Republic of