Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Roflumilast in Patients with NASH

November 6, 2024 updated by: Mokhtar Salem Mohamed, Tanta University

Efficacy and Safety of Roflumilast in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Study type :clinical trial Main purpose :esnsure safety and efficacy of Roflumilast to treat patients with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Background and aim: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is the most prevalent chronic liver disease globally. There is no defined therapy for non-alcholic steatohepatitis (NASH), therefore this study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of Roflumilast in patients with non-alcoholic NASH.

Methods: This randomized controlled parallel study involved 55 patients with NASH who were randomized into vitamin E group or control group (n=24) which received vitamin E 1000 mg once daily and roflumilast group (n=31) which received roflumilast 500 μg once daily for three months.

Patients were assessed at baseline and after intervention through liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using fibro-scan and through evaluation of serum levels of tumor necrosis factor -alpha (TNF-α), Malondialdehyde (MDA), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-ß1). In addition, liver enzymes, lipid panel, fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin level with subsequent calculation of the homeostatic model assessment for Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were also assessed.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gharbia
      • Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt, 6620010
        • Tanta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Cytokeratine level >240 IU/L.
  • Adult patient (age > 18 years old).
  • Both sex.
  • Overweight and obese.
  • Patients with evidence of steatosis through imaging.
  • Patient with mild to moderate elevation in aminotransferase activity (>2 ,but <5 times upper limit of normal ).
  • Patient with Hepatic steatosis index (HSI) > 36.
  • Patient with HAIR ( hypertension ,alanine aminotransferase level ,insulin resistance ) of 2 or 3.
  • Fibroscan score >7Kpa and < 12.5 Kpa (F2 - F3).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Alcohol consumer and smokers
  • Patients with Wilson's disease and hemochromatosis .
  • Patients with viral hepatitis.
  • Patients with cirrhosis .
  • Patients with inflammatory diseases .
  • Patients with other comorbid disease that elevate transaminases (congestive heart failure and malignancy).
  • Patients on medications that interfere with lipid and carbohydrate metabolism..
  • Patients on stateogenic medications.
  • Pregnancy and lactating women.
  • Females on oral contraceptive pills.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Roflumilast group (n=31)
Arm Description: Roflumilast group (n=31) which received roflumilast 500 μg once daily for three months. Patients were assessed at baseline and after intervention through liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using fibro-scan and through evaluation of serum levels of tumor necrosis factor -alpha (TNF-α), Malondialdehyde (MDA), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-ß1). In addition, liver enzymes, lipid panel, fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin level with subsequent calculation of homeostatic model assessment for Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were also assessed.
Patients in this group received roflumilast 500 μg once daily for three months.
Active Comparator: Vitamin E group or control group (n=24)
vitamin E group or control group (n=24) which received vitamin E 1000 mg once daily. Patients were assessed at baseline and after intervention through liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using fibro-scan and through evaluation of serum levels of tumor necrosis factor -alpha (TNF-α), Malondialdehyde (MDA), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-ß1). In addition, liver enzymes, lipid panel, fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin level with subsequent calculation of homeostatic model assessment for Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were also assessed.
vitamin E group or control group (n=24) which received vitamin E 1000 mg once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in liver stiffness measurement (LSM) measured by fibroscan score
Time Frame: 12 weeks following the end of treatment
Liver Stiffness measurement (LSM) by fibro-scan. Transient elastography (Fibroscan, Echosens, Paris) was used to assess liver stiffness depending up-on the method formerly prescribed .Through a single independent operator, at least ten valid measurements were obtained for each patient. Results were included in the final analysis only if the following three criteria were met: at least ten valid measurements, success rate >60% and the interquartile range (IQR)-to-liver stiffness ratio was ≤0.30. The median values of the validated measurements for each patient were representative to the liver stiffness and expressed in units of kilopascals (kPa)
12 weeks following the end of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in liver panel parameters
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
Blood sample collection and biochemical measurement of Approximately 10 ml of venous blood was taken from each patient after overnight fasting by sterile venipuncture, without frothing and after minimal venous stasis using disposable syringes. Blood samples were delivered in a vacutainer serum separator tubes. Immediate centrifugation at 3000 rpm was performed and then the serum was separated and divided into two portions. The first portion was used for determination of fasting blood glucose (glucose oxidase method), liver enzymes aspartate transaminase "AST", alanine transaminase "ALT" and gamma-glutamyl transaminase "GGT" (spectrophotometerially) and lipid panel (enzymatic colorimeteric method).
3 months after treatment
Improvement in HOMA IR
Time Frame: 12 weeks following the end of treatment
HOMA-IR is calculated as [Fasting Insulin (μg/ml)]*[Fasting Glucose (mmol/l)]/22.5,HOMA-IR values between 0.5 and 1.4 are considered normal, ≥1.9 are indicative of early IR, and ≥2.9 indicate IR
12 weeks following the end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Tarek Mohamed Mostafa, Professor of clinical pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy , Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in non alcoholic steatohepatitis. Data or samples shared will be coded, with no PHI included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact Mokhtaarsalem@gmail.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe