Medial Enhancement Technique for the Treatment of Old Femoral Neck Fractures

December 3, 2024 updated by: Zhang Wei, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Medial Enhancement Technique for the Treatment of Old Femoral Neck Fractures

A prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study was conducted to validate the safety and effectiveness of employing the medial augmentation technique (incorporating the dynamic condylar screw and medial support plate) supplemented with bone grafting for the treatment of old femoral neck fractures.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Chinese PLA General Hosptial

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >= 18 years, gender not specified;
  2. Patients with femoral neck fractures who have not undergone surgery for more than 3 weeks, or patients with persistent non-union following internal fixation of femoral neck fractures;
  3. Have indications for internal fixation surgery for femoral neck fractures and are able to tolerate the surgery;
  4. Participants or their legal representatives are informed about the nature of this study and agree to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who have not reached the primary endpoint of other drug, biological agent, or medical device clinical trials prior to enrollment;
  2. Known history of hypersensitivity to one or more implanted materials by the patient;
  3. Judged by the investigator as physically frail or unable to tolerate surgery due to other systemic diseases;
  4. Active infectious foci in the hip joint or other parts of the body, as judged by the investigator;
  5. Diagnosed with metabolic bone disease, radiation-induced bone disease, etc.;
  6. Severe hip contracture deformity or severe muscle weakness that has been immobilized in functional position for a long time and painless;
  7. Suffering from inflammatory arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, etc.;
  8. Patients who lack the mental capacity or understanding to meet the requirements of participating in the study, or are difficult to cooperate with;
  9. Other situations where the investigator deems the participant unsuitable for inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Cannulated compression screws + iliac bone graft group
Using "cannulated compression screws + iliac bone graft" technique to treat old femoral neck fractures
Experimental: DCS + medial support plate + iliac bone graft group
Using "DCS + medial support plate + iliac bone graft" technique to treat old femoral neck fractures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Fracture healing rate
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Femoral head necrosis
Time Frame: 1 year
Commonly used imaging tools include X-rays, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and Computerized Tomography (CT). X-rays are the most commonly employed assessment tool, capable of displaying the morphology of the femoral head and whether the bone structure is normal. MRI and CT can provide more detailed images, aiding in the determination of the extent and range of femoral head necrosis.
1 year
Harris score
Time Frame: 1 year
The Harris Score (Harris Hip Score, HHS) is a widely used scale for evaluating hip joint function and patient quality of life, often applied to assess the outcomes of hip replacement surgery or other treatments for hip joint diseases. It covers four main aspects: pain level, functional activity, joint range of motion, and hip joint deformity. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible condition, indicating complete normalcy of hip joint function.
1 year
VAS score
Time Frame: 1 year
The VAS score (Visual Analog Scale) is a commonly used tool for quantifying pain assessment that is suitable for measuring various degrees of pain. The VAS score typically employs a straight line 10 centimeters long (or an equivalent visual scale), with each end marked as "No Pain" and "Most Intense Pain" respectively. A straight line 10 centimeters long (or an equivalent visual scale) is often utilized, with each end labeled as "No Pain" and "Most Intense Pain."
1 year
Complications
Time Frame: 1 year
Focusing on perioperative complications in patients, indications and symptoms of incision infection, including redness, swelling, drainage, and fever, should be carefully monitored. The incidence and severity of infection cases should be recorded and analyzed to evaluate the risk factors for postoperative infection and the effectiveness of preventive strategies. Unplanned reoperations should be recorded, including cases of primary surgery failure, development of complications, or other situations necessitating further surgical intervention. Detailed records of the causes, timing, and outcomes of reoperations will help evaluate the reliability of surgical techniques and internal fixation devices. Additionally, other postoperative complications, such as femoral head necrosis, repositioning of fracture ends, fixation loosening and breakage, should be meticulously recorded and observed.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fracture of Neck of Femur

Clinical Trials on cannulated compression screws + iliac bone graft

Subscribe