Parent Encouragement And Coaching of Happiness in Youth (PEACHY)

January 26, 2026 updated by: Judith Morgan, University of Pittsburgh

Maternal Positive Affect Socialization and Child Neural Reward Response

The goal of this mechanistic clinical trial is to examine whether parent-coaching aimed at increasing child positive affect will increase child neural response to reward. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Aim 1. Characterize child neural reward response and its relation to maternal socialization of positive emotions at baseline in healthy young children.

Aim 2. Evaluate how coaching-related changes in maternal socialization of positive emotion expression contribute to increases in child neural reward response over time.

Aim 3. Examine how maternal socialization of positive emotion expression contributes to increases in child neural reward response in the moment.

Participating mother-child dyads will be randomized to either 3 sessions of parent coaching of child positive affect or 3 sessions of a general parenting support intervention and neural response to reward and affective behavior will be examined pre and post intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Reward-related brain function is consistently linked to greater motivation, pleasure, and goal-directed behavior and lower risk for depression across the lifespan. Healthy neural reward response supports socioemotional development, particularly during early childhood as self-regulatory skills and child reward-related brain function are rapidly developing in the context of the caregiving environment. Maternal socialization of positive emotion is one important influence on early reward circuitry development. Mothers with depression are more likely to discourage (and less likely to encourage) child positive emotions compared to healthy mothers, which may contribute to early neural reward alterations in their children. Characterizing mechanisms of influence of maternal socialization on child neural reward response and positive emotion during early childhood is a critical window of opportunity when parents have a large influence on child socioemotional development. Importantly, maternal behavior is amenable to change by training parents on emotion coaching, and these maternal behavior changes may result in direct and immediate changes in child neural reward function. Thus, the overarching aim of this proposal is to use a mechanistic trial design to experimentally test the hypothesis that maternal encouragement of child positive emotion will lead to in-vivo increases in child neural reward response. Event-related potentials (ERPs) are uniquely suited to non-invasively assess in-vivo, fast-occurring changes in child reward response during parent-child interactions, including reward positivity (RewP), and the late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes. Toward this aim, the investigators will randomize 180 mothers with clinically significant depression symptoms and their 4- to 6-year-old children (50% female) to receive either 3 control sessions or 3 positive emotion coaching modules from the Parent-Child Interaction Therapy-Emotion Development (PCIT-ED, which trains mothers on how to encourage positive emotion in their young children. Children will complete reward tasks at pre- and post-coaching, while neural reward response is assessed via ERP (RewP and LPP) with their mothers present allowing for in-vivo assessment of maternal behavior. At both timepoints, the investigators will assess child neural reward response and mothers' self-reported maternal socialization behaviors. Understanding how disrupted neural reward responding develops in early childhood is critical for the promotion of child emotional wellness and can be directly used to develop preventive interventions tailored to young children at familial risk for depression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Julie Research Coordinator
  • Phone Number: 412-509-8787
  • Email: PEACHY@upmc.edu

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pittsburgh
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Judith K Morgan, PhD
          • Phone Number: 412-383-5454
          • Email: jkm46@pitt.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Mothers:

  • Birth mother (biologically female, any gender)
  • Providing regular care for participating child (i.e., at least 50% of time)
  • Elevated, clinically significant levels of depression (16 or higher on CES-D)
  • Aged 18+

Exclusion Criteria for Mothers:

  • Lifetime history of a bipolar disorder
  • Lifetime history of a psychotic disorder

Inclusion Criteria for Participating Child:

-Aged 4-6 years

Exclusion Criteria for Participating Child:

  • T-score greater than 63 on the internalizing or externalizing composites of the CBCL
  • Lifetime history of a psychiatric illness
  • Lifetime history of neurodevelopmental disorder
  • Lifetime history of neurological disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Parent Coaching
Parents will receive 3 sessions based on PCIT-ED aimed at increasing child positive affect.
Three sessions of parent coaching of child positive affect will be administered based on modules from PCIT-ED.
Other Names:
  • PCIT-ED
Active Comparator: Active Control
Parents will receive 3 sessions based on traditional PCIT providing more general parenting supporting, including basic psychoeducation and parenting skills.
General parent support and psychoeducation based on components of standard PCIT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reward Positivity (RewP)
Time Frame: From baseline week 1 to final assessment week 5 (week 10 maximum)
The Reward Positivity (RewP) ERP component of the EEG signal is the mean amplitude (μV; microvolt) on gain-loss trials during receipt of reward related feedback in a computerized reward task with higher RewP amplitudes indicating greater reward response (i.e., more favorable outcome).
From baseline week 1 to final assessment week 5 (week 10 maximum)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parent Responses to Child Positive affect Scale (PRCPS)
Time Frame: From baseline week 1 to final assessment week 5 (week 10 maximum)
Change in total score (sum of 7-point Likert scores) on the mother-reported Parent Responses to Child Positive affect Scale (PRCPS) encouragement subscale. The range of possible scores for this outcome is 0 to 84 with higher scores reflecting higher encouragement (i.e., more favorable outcome).
From baseline week 1 to final assessment week 5 (week 10 maximum)
Behavioral Coding of Parental Encouragement of Child Positive Emotion
Time Frame: From baseline week 1 to final assessment week 5 (week 10 maximum)
Parent and child positive emotion will be coded separately on a 0 - 2 scale in 5 second increments. Parental encouragement of child positive emotion will be calculated as the proportion of epochs in which mothers display positive emotion subsequent to child positive emotion expression in the previous epoch. Higher scores indicate greater parental encouragement of child positive emotion (i.e., more favorable outcome).
From baseline week 1 to final assessment week 5 (week 10 maximum)
Late Positive Potential (LPP)
Time Frame: From baseline week 1 to final assessment week 5 (week 10 maximum)
The Late Positive Potential (LPP) ERP component of the EEG signal is the mean amplitude (μV; microvolt) on positive-negative trials during a picture viewing computerized task. Great LPP amplitudes to positive vs. neutral pictures indicate greater response to positive affect (i.e., more favorable outcome).
From baseline week 1 to final assessment week 5 (week 10 maximum)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Judith M Morgan, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: Lauren M. Bylsma, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY24040170
  • R01MH135881 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared with the NIH NDA per NIH requirements, which include all primary study measures and demographic information. Participant identifying information is used to create an anonymized GUID to identify participants in the NDA but no identifiable information will be shared publicly.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

We will begin to upload data to the NIH NDA beginning in July 2025 per NIMH requirements, which would then be made publicly available by November 2025. Data in the NDA will be made available indefinitely as long as the NDA exists as a resource.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Informed consent documents, protocol information, and statistical analysis plan information will all be uploaded to clinicaltrials.gov. Access to participant level data will be managed by the NIH National Data Archive where all the individual participant data and supporting information will be uploaded. Additional data regarding statistical analyses and corresponding code will be provided as supplemental material to publications that use this data. Since this is a mechanistic clinical trial and not an RCT, a CSR is not applicable.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Parent Coaching

Subscribe