Physiological Effect High-flow Tracheal Oxygen on Viscosity of Airway Mucus and Respiratory Effort in Patients Weaning from Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (PIONEER)

January 10, 2025 updated by: Henrik Endeman

Rationale: Tracheostomized patients weaning from mechanical ventilation are at risk for dryness of airway mucosa and sputum accumulation during disconnection from mechanical ventilation. High-flow tracheal oxygen (HFTO) is being used as supportive therapy during disconnection sessions in tracheostomized patients weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) to limit dryness while maintaining oxygenation. We recently summarized the studies comparing physiological effects HFTO as compared to other interfaces, collectively referred to as conventional oxygen therapy (COT), in a systematic review and identified areas of lacking knowledge: effect on sputum viscoelasticity, respiratory effort early in the weaning process and dyspnea sensation. We hypothesize that HFTO, compared to COT, decreases viscoelasticity of the sputum and provides respiratory support during weaning. This may improve weaning by facilitating clearance of airway mucus, preventing respiratory failure, and providing comfort by decreasing dyspnea.

Objective: To determine the physiological effect of HFTO compared to COT on sputum viscoelasticity, respiratory effort and dyspnoea.

Study design: Pilot study with randomized crossover design, single-center. Study population: Twenty adult patients weaning from mechanical ventilation with tracheostomy.

Intervention (if applicable): Crossover with COT and HFTO during two days in the weaning phase.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint: sputum viscoelasticity measured by rheology during long disconnection sessions in the final phase of weaning. Secondary endpoints: respiratory effect measured by swings in esophageal pressure (PES) and prevalence and severity of dyspnoea sensation by visual analogue scale (VAS).

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The study compares two therapeutic modalities both used in clinical care without side-effects or complications. Study procedures and measurements consist of standard clinical procedures that are performed daily in clinical setting with negligible risk of deterioration for the patient. During weaning with HFTO sputum clearance might be more easy for the patient and respiratory effort might decrease, both are assumed to be beneficial for the weaning process of the patient.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Thijs Janssen Resident pulmonology, Critical Care researcher, MD
  • Phone Number: 0107035142
  • Email: m.l.janssen@erasmusmc.nl

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Henrik Endeman Intensivist, Assistant Professor Intensive Care, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 0107035142
  • Email: h.endeman@erasmusmc.nl

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Weaning from mechanical ventilation with tracheostomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Longstanding tracheostomy, defined as tracheostomy being present prior to current hospital admission
  • Tracheostomy primarily indicated for chronic upper airway obstruction or to secure airway patency due to persistent stupor/coma
  • Chronic positive pressure respiratory support at home (excluding night-time continuous positive airway pressure for sleep apnea)
  • Mucociliary disease in medical history (e.g. cystic fibrosis, pulmonary ciliary dyskinesia)
  • Neuromuscular disease in medical history (excluding ICU-acquired weakness)
  • Contra-indication placement oesophageal balloon for measurement of PES, such as:

    • Fractures in mandibular, orbital or ethmoid bone or skull base
    • Esophageal varices or surgery in medical history
    • Severe bleeding disorders
  • Hemoptysis in 72 hours prior to the first disconnection session. Clinically relevant hemoptysis is defined as hemoptysis requiring tracheal/endobronchial or radiologic intervention, or administration of pro-coagulating drugs such as tranexamic acid.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: First high-flow tracheal oxygen, then conventional oxygen therapy
The disconnection sessions on the days with study measurements are started with high-flow tracheal oxygen, and the second disconnection session is supported with conventional oxygen therapy. Conventional oxygen therapy is provided using a heat-moisture exchanger.
All patients are subject to both oxygen therapy groups in this randomized cross-over study. Study measurements are performed during several different disconnection sessions. Disconnection sessions can either be short (<90 min) or long (12 hours). Both short and long disconnection sessions are performed twice; once with conventional oxygen, and once with high-flow tracheal oxygen as respiratory support.
Active Comparator: First conventional oxygen therapy, then high-flow tracheal oxygen
The disconnection sessions on the days with study measurements are started with conventional oxygen therapy, and the second disconnection session is supported with high-flow tracheal oxygen. Conventional oxygen therapy is provided using a heat-moisture exchanger.
All patients are subject to both oxygen therapy groups in this randomized cross-over study. Study measurements are performed during several different disconnection sessions. Disconnection sessions can either be short (<90 min) or long (12 hours). Both short and long disconnection sessions are performed twice; once with conventional oxygen, and once with high-flow tracheal oxygen as respiratory support.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sputum viscoelasticity
Time Frame: The 12-hour disconnection session
During disconnection from the ventilator patients do not breathe actively heated and humidified gas mixtures. During disconnection from the ventilator the airway mucus thickens. This thickening can be quantified by measuring visco-elasticity and at the end of the disconnection sessions. The change in visco-elasticity between the start and end of the disconnection session will be compared within patients between disconnection sessions with HME and HFTO. Hence, the primary end-point is the change in sputum viscoelasticity from baseline to the end of the long disconnection sessions (≥12 hours). Viscoelastic (G*) is made up of elasticity (G') and viscosity (G'') of mucus at a 5% strain rate (or linear viscoelastic region, which reflects the small deformation regime) and the critical stress (σ critical)· and strain (y critical) of mucus, which reflect the behavior of mucus under high amounts of shear stress and thus the large deformation regime.
The 12-hour disconnection session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sputum visco-elasiticity
Time Frame: The short disconnection session (<90 minutes)
The difference between COT and HFTO in change in sputum viscoelasticity from baseline to the end (after 10-90 min) of the early disconnection session
The short disconnection session (<90 minutes)
Dyspnea presence
Time Frame: At early (<90 min) and late (12 hour) disconnection sessions
The presence of self-reported dyspnea sensation during early (<90 min) and late (12 hour) disconnection sessions. Presence of self-reported dyspnea and discomfort is evaluated by asking patients.
At early (<90 min) and late (12 hour) disconnection sessions
Respiratory effort
Time Frame: The short disconnection session (<90 minutes)
The difference in respiratory effort between conventional oxygen therapy and high-flow oxygen therapy during early disconnection sessions measured by median esophageal pressure swing and pressure time product during the early disconnection session.
The short disconnection session (<90 minutes)
Dyspnea severity
Time Frame: early (<90 min) and late (12 hour) disconnection sessions
The severity of self-reported dyspnea sensation during early (<90 min) and late (12 hour) disconnection sessions. Severity of self-reported dyspnea is evaluated using a dyspnea visual-analog scale (D-VAS)
early (<90 min) and late (12 hour) disconnection sessions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MEC-2024-0468
  • NL87502.078.24 (Other Identifier: ABR)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Oxygen therapy

Subscribe