Is Methenamine Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infection After Midurethral Sling As Effective As Antibiotic Prophylaxis?

February 5, 2025 updated by: Shaun Adair, Atlantic Health System

Is Methenamine Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infection After Midurethral Sling As Effective As Antibiotic Prophylaxis? a Randomized Controlled Trial

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects at least 40% of women in the United States. Synthetic polypropylene mid-urethral slings (MUS) are the gold standard treatment for SUI. Post-operative urinary tract infections (UTI) are one of the most common complications after MUS placement. Some studies have demonstrated that MUS placement can increase the risk of UTI up to 21-34%.

Post-operative UTI can lead to significant healthcare and patient burden. This additional burden further contributes to an estimated annual cost of $1.6 billion for UTI management in the United States. With increased antibiotic usage, there is simultaneous increase in bacterial resistance leading to treatment refractory UTI.

The investigators prescribe post-operative antibiotics prophylactically for 3 days after MUS placement with or without concurrent pelvic reconstructive surgery based on prior literature recommending post-operative prophylaxis. There is a greater emphasis on limiting antibiotic use given the trend of development of bacterial resistance. There are studies supporting alternatives such as methenamine for recurrent UTI prophylaxis treatment, but there are limited studies evaluating methenamine for UTI prophylaxis after MUS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Synthetic polypropylene mid-urethral slings (MUS) are the gold standard for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The most common post-operative complications are urinary tract infection (UTI), bladder injury, bleeding, and mesh erosion. Amongst these complications, post-operative urinary tract infections are the most common complication with incidences up to 21-34%. With high incidences in post-operative UTI, previous studies have shown evidence for the use of prophylactic antibiotics after MUS placement. Previous studies have demonstrated prophylactic antibiotics after MUS placement decreased the incidence of post-operative UTI in the treated groups. While the use of post-operative prophylactic antibiotics may decrease the risk of post-operative UTI, it is essential to consider the broader implication of such antibiotic use.

Along with increased antibiotic use, there is an increase in multidrug resistant uropathogens. This has led to an increased emphasis on antibiotic stewardship to optimize patient care by minimizing the risk of developing antibiotic resistant organisms, preserving effectiveness of currently used antibiotics, and promoting appropriate prescribing practices. There are no studies evaluating post-operative UTI prophylaxis after MUS with methenamine.

Methenamine is a urinary antiseptic that acts when methenamine is converted to ammonia and formaldehyde, which denatures bacterial proteins and nucleic acids. There is no evidence of bacterial resistance to methenamine. Methenamine has been shown to be non-inferior to antibiotic prophylaxis in the setting of recurrent UTI. Methenamine has most commonly been used as long-term UTI prophylaxis treatment, but there are studies demonstrating benefit from short-term methenamine use for prophylaxis.

The investigator's aim is to evaluate whether methenamine is non-inferior to antibiotic prophylaxis after MUS procedure in preventing post-operative UTI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

190

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07928
        • Recruiting
        • Atlantic Health
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Shaun Adair, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female
  2. Age ≥ 18
  3. Patients undergoing mid-urethral sling procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medication intolerance or allergy to study medications
  2. Renal impairment with GFR <30
  3. Breast feeding
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Recurrent urinary tract infections
  6. Active urinary tract infection
  7. Immunosuppressive disease
  8. Interstitial cystitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Methenamine prophylaxis
Methenamine will be prescribed for urinary tract infection prophylaxis
Antibiotic prophylaxis
Active Comparator: Antibiotic prophylaxis
Antibiotic prophylaxis chosen per physician preference
Antibiotic prophylaxis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of urinary tract infection
Time Frame: Within 6 weeks after the procedure
Urinary tract infection (Positive urine culture) within 6 weeks post-operatively after completing 3 days of antibiotics or methenamine
Within 6 weeks after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse effects
Time Frame: within 6 weeks after the procedure
Adverse effects or side effects of treatment
within 6 weeks after the procedure
Occurrence of additional treatment of UTI
Time Frame: Within 6 weeks after the procedure
Further treatment antibiotics given to participants
Within 6 weeks after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe