Trial of Differential Margins in Single Isocenter Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases

October 14, 2025 updated by: John Fiveash, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

UAB 2507 - Randomized Phase II Study of Differential Margins in Single Isocenter Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases

Radiosurgery is the use of a focal high dose of radiation therapy to ablate or kill a tumor. This trial will enroll patients with brain metastases 4 cm or less in greatest diameter and will compare 0mm margin to a 2mm margin for treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Without a stereotactic frame there is considerable variation in practice in the use of planning target volume (PTV) margins for linac radiosurgery. In particular, the use of a single isocenter for multiple targets geometrically increases the risk that rotational errors will result in significant dosimetric errors, and many centers have considered adding margin. A recent AAPM task group survey has found that ~90% of centers worldwide add a PTV margin to account for error and that 8% add more than 2 mm. The most common margin is 2 mm. Other potential reasons to add a margin include spacial MRI error, couch walkout, CBCT to linac isocenter mismatch, and undetected intrafraction motion. Treatment volume is the greatest predictor of radiation toxicity associated with radiosurgery and potentially unnecessary margins will lead to increased risk to the patient. This trial will incorporate a composite endpoint that includes control of the tumor and toxicity.

Uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP) is defined as the chance the tumor is locally controlled (TCP) without grade 3 or greater CNS toxicity (1-NTCP). The investigators hypothesize a 2 mm margin will worsen uncomplicated control compared to a 0 mm PTV margin in the treatment multiple metastases in a single fraction.

This trial will inform the standard of care margin (0 mm vs 2 mm) for single isocenter treatment of multiple targets.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hazelrig-Salter Radiation Oncology Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • John Fiveash, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kristen Riley, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Richard Popple, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christopher Willey, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Samual Marcrom, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hunter Boggs, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christopher Dobbelbower, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • James Markert, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Phillip Schmalz, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Winfield Fisher, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  2. Male or female, aged 19 and older
  3. Brain metastases diagnosis not requiring retreatment to the same tumor
  4. For females of reproductive potential should undergo pregnancy testing as per UAB Radiation Oncology standard policies
  5. Ability of subject or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR)) to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current use of cytotoxic chemotherapy within 3 days of treatment. There are no restrictions on the use of immunotherapy during treatment. TKIs known to be radiation sensitizers such as BRAF should be held at least 24 hours prior to treatment.
  2. Inability to have MRI imaging
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Treatment with another investigational drug 14 days of enrollment
  5. Radiosurgery planned for post-operative adjuvant cavity only. Patients with any gross residual after surgery are eligible. Patients with at least one intact metastasis may enroll but adjuvant cavity will not be evaluable.
  6. At the time of Radiation Oncology consultation more than twenty targets are identified. Note that it is common that a few additional metastases may be identified during the treatment planning or peer review processes. More than twenty targets may be included if this number is found after the initial clinical review of the treatment planning MRI.
  7. Tumor maximal diameter > 4 cm.
  8. Prior SBRT or SRS to a lesion planned for retreatment. Note that patients with prior whole brain radiation alone are eligible.
  9. Patients with diffuse leptomeningeal tumor are not eligible. Patients with a focal dural or pachymeningeal tumor are eligible if other intra-axial tumors are planned to be treated. Similar to postoperative cavities, the pachymeningeal tumor deposit will be treated but not evaluable for the assessment of local control or toxicity.

INCLUSION OF VULNERABLE PARTICIPANTS Vulnerable populations as defined by the NIH including children, prisoners, and adult subjects who lack capacity to consent to research participation are not eligible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 0mm margin

For each patient two radiation treatment plans will be created. One will have 0 mm margin for the planning target volume.

Tumors will be prescribed based upon the maximum diameter of the largest tumor and location at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist with the following guidance:

< 2.0 cm diameter 16-20 Gy 2.0-4.0 cm diameter 3 fractions of 9 Gy for total 27 Gy.

Radiosurgery is the use of a focal high dose of radiation therapy to ablate or kill a tumor. This trial will enroll patients with brain metastases 4 cm or less in greatest diameter and will compare 0mm margin to a 2mm margin for treatment.
Active Comparator: 2mm margin

For each patient two radiation treatment plans will be created. One will be 2 mm margin for the planning target volume.

Tumors will be prescribed based upon the maximum diameter of the largest tumor and location at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist with the following guidance:

< 2.0 cm diameter 16-20 Gy 2.0-4.0 cm diameter 3 fractions of 9 Gy for total 27 Gy.

Radiosurgery is the use of a focal high dose of radiation therapy to ablate or kill a tumor. This trial will enroll patients with brain metastases 4 cm or less in greatest diameter and will compare 0mm margin to a 2mm margin for treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between 0mm and 2mm
Time Frame: 12 months
Fisher's Exact Test to determine if (per patient) uncomplicated control is improved or worsened with the addition of a 2mm PTV margin in the treatment of brain metastases with single isocenter radiosurgery.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum margin size of the tumor
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare 0mm margin and 2mm margin radiosurgery for local tumor control, RANO assessment by individual tumor calculated by multiplying the longest diameter on an axial slice and its longest perpendicular diameter on the same slice
12 months
Percentage of toxicity
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare 0mm margin and 2mm margin radiosurgery for toxicity. NTCP - assessed per tumor and per patient, assign to all tumors if attribution ambiguous (only grade 3 or greater CNS toxicity included)
12 months
Change in normal brain dosimetry
Time Frame: 12 months

To compare 0mm margin and 2mm margin radiosurgery for normal brain dosimetry.

  • Dosimetry of normal brain (2 mm vs 0 mm)
  • Dosimetry of hippocampi (2 mm vs 0 mm)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John A Fiveash, MD, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Metastases

Clinical Trials on brain metastases radiosurgery

Subscribe