- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06878820
Nurses in the Lead - Nursing Leadership and Autonomy in Function Focused Care in Hospital
Nurses in the Lead - Nursing Leadership and Autonomy in Function Focused Care in Hospital: a Prospective Before-after Study
The goal of this prospective before-after study (observational) is to implement Function Focused Care in Hospital (FFCiH), paying specific attention to the role of nurses and how they can take the leadership and autonomy in the interprofessional collaboration regarding FFCiH. To reach this aim, the researchers defined two sub-objectives:
1. to identify barriers and facilitators (determinants) for nursing autonomy and leadership and application FFCiH in the interprofessional collaboration on a surgical and internal medicine ward to design a tailored implementation strategy for FFCiH. 2. to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation strategy on nursing leadership and the application of FFCiH.
The investigators developed two work packages related to the two sub-objectives: identifying determinants and strategies for the successful application of FFCiH and nurse leadership, among others, by introducing nurse champions and evaluating their effect on the application of FFCiH. The primary endpoint is the level of application of FFCiH as reflected in adherence to and coverage of FFCiH in daily nursing care.
The secondary endpoints are: 1) for nurses: the nurses' role development with regards to leadership and autonomy in the application of FFCiH by ward nurses and nurse champions, leadership competencies of ward nurses, and autonomy of ward nurses and 2) for patients: physical functioning and independency in mobility and ADL.
Researchers will compare FFCiH with usual care to see if there are differences regarding the outcome measurements.
The study population consists of nurses, physiotherapists, doctors, other member of the interprofessional team, hospitalized patients and their relatives.
Intervention: FFCiH focuses on stimulating nurses to promote patients' self-reliance in daily functioning, encouraging the patients' engagement in daily activities and, helping patients to attain and maintain their highest level of function and increasing time spent in physical activity. FFCiH is a proven effective approach for promoting patients' physical functioning and mobility.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Doetinchem, Netherlands, 3584 CS
- Stichting Slingeland Ziekenhuis
-
Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center
-
Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Erasmus MC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
The domain of this study consists of
- nurses, physiotherapists, doctors, other member of the interprofessional team (e.g. occupational therapist),
- patients admitted to a surgical respectively internal medicine ward of a hospital, and their informal caregivers.
Description
Nurses and student nurses (vocational nursing educational level (MBO)/ (bachelor nursing educational level (HBO)):
Inclusion Criteria:
- All (student-)nurses working in the participating wards are expected to be involved in application of FFC and role development with regards to leadership and autonomy of nurses and therefore considered to be eligible for participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- No exclusion criteria were defined for nurses and student nurses.
Physiotherapists, doctors and other member of the interprofessional team;
Inclusion Criteria:
- All professional groups that are part of the interprofessional team of the ward and who work in the participating wards are expected to collaborate with the nursing in their daily care and therefore considered to be eligible for participation in this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- No exclusion criteria were defined for physiotherapists, doctors and other members of the interprofessional team.
Patients and informal caregivers:
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients admitted to the participating wards of the 2 hospitals receiving care either before or after the implementation of FFC and the patients informal caregiver as determined by the patient.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A life-threatening situation or in a terminal phase upon admission (only applicable to patients)
- Not mastering the Dutch language;
- Not able to communicate adequately, based on a below threshold score on the MOCA or the FAST (only applicable to patients)
- A second hospitalization on one of the participating wards after being included in the study during the study period;
- An hospitalization < 48 hours
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Function Focused Care
Nurses provide care according to Function Focused Care in Hospital (FFCiH) principles.
After implementation of this intervention, all patients admitted to the selected wards in the hospital receive FFCiH.
|
FFCiH is an effective nursing approach and focuses on stimulating nurses to promote patients' self-reliance in daily functioning, encouraging the patients' engagement in daily activities and helping patients to attain and maintain their highest level of function and to increase time spent in physical activity.
Other Names:
|
|
Usual Care
Before implementation of Function Focused Care in Hospital, nurses provide care as usual to patients admitted to the selected wards in hospital
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Level of leadership using the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) - Nurses
Time Frame: up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation
|
The LPI questionnaire consist of 30 leadership behaviors presented as behavioral statements, that can categorized into 5 subscales, representing five leadership practices: 1) Model the way, 2) Inspire a shared vision, 3) Challenge the process, 4) Enable others to act, and 5) Encourage the heart.
Each of these statement can be scored on a 10-point Likert scale, for which a higher score indicate more frequent the respondent engage in the leadership behavior.
The internal reliability of the LPI in nurses ranges from 0.66 to 0.96.36
The original questionnaire has been translated into Dutch.
|
up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation
|
|
Level of autonomy - Nurses
Time Frame: up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation
|
Using the Maastricht Autonomy Questionnaire (MAQ), which consists of 10 items scored on a five-point Likert scale ranging from very little to very much.The total score ranges from 10 to 50.
Higher scores indicate more job autonomy.
The questionnaire includes information on job control and freedom in work tasks and methods.
It measures the opportunity for staff to determine a variety of task elements, such as the pace of work and the work goals.
A sample item is: 'My work offers me the opportunity to interrupt my job whenever I want.'
Current study findings confirmed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.90).
|
up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adherence (fidelity)
Time Frame: up to four weeks after implementation
|
Refers to the extent to which FFCiH has been applied as intended, and will be measured with the key components of FFCiH, such as goal setting with patient, individualized care plan, encouragement of patient's active involvement in ADL and evaluation the level of the patient's ADL-independence and mobility. This outcome will be measured with
|
up to four weeks after implementation
|
|
Level of mobility - Patients
Time Frame: <72 hours after hospital admission and at discharge (assessed up to 3 days)
|
Measured using the AMEXO.
this measure is the Amsterdam UMC extension of the John Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (AMEXO) scale.
The instrument consist of twelve categories representing the highest level of mobility.
The response categories includes: 1= bed lying; 2= bed turn self/activity; 3= bed sit at edge; 4= chair transfer; 5= stand 1 minute; 6=walk 10+ steps; 7=walk 25+ feet; 8=walk 250+ feet ,9= 225m; 10= 450m; 11= 750m; 12= 1125m.:.'.
The higher the total score, the higher the level of independence.
|
<72 hours after hospital admission and at discharge (assessed up to 3 days)
|
|
Level of independence in Activities of Daily Livings - patients
Time Frame: <72 hours after hospital admission and at discharge (assessed up to 3 days)
|
Measured with the KATZ-ADL.
This measurement consists of 6 items: bathing, dressing, toilet visit, movement inside the house, continence, feeding.
The items score on a 2 point scale: dependent or independent.
|
<72 hours after hospital admission and at discharge (assessed up to 3 days)
|
|
Level of coverage (reach)
Time Frame: up to four weeks after implementation
|
Refers to the extent to which patients actually receive FFCiH, and measured by determining the extent to which patients who qualify for FFCiH actually receive it. This outcome will be measured with 1) qualitative focus group interviews with the multidisciplinary team and individual interviews with patients. Topics include the key components of FFCiH. 2) Screening of electronic patient records. The electronic patient records will be screened on the number of reported short- and long-term goals and the amount of nursing report that contains information about bathing, dressing, mobility or transfers. |
up to four weeks after implementation
|
|
Numbers of days stayed in the hospital - patients
Time Frame: At discharge (assessed up to 14 days)
|
Based on the findings in our previous study and known from clinical practice, we know that discharge from hospital highly depends on independence in ADL and/or mobility.
As a result, it is expected that a recovery of independence in ADL and mobility primarily does not lead to higher levels of independence in ADL and mobility at discharge, but to a shorter admission with the same level of independence in ADL and mobility.
Therefore, we also will collect data from patient files regarding the duration of hospital admission.
|
At discharge (assessed up to 14 days)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline characteristics nurses
Time Frame: Up to four weeks before implementation
|
|
Up to four weeks before implementation
|
|
Baseline characteristics patients and their informal caregivers
Time Frame: <72 hours after hospital admission
|
|
<72 hours after hospital admission
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Janneke M de Man - van Ginkel, Leiden University Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kok S, Schoonhoven L, Vernooij LM, Reitsma JB, Verstraten C, Metzelthin SF, Bleijenberg N, de Man-van Ginkel JM. The effectiveness of Function Focused Care among patients acutely admitted to hospital: A stepped wedge cluster trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Dec;160:104893. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104893. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
- Kok S, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Verstraten C, Resnick B, Metzelthin SF, Bleijenberg N, Schoonhoven L. Function focused care in hospital: A mixed-method feasibility study. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Sep 29;3:100045. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100045. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 134718
- 10040022230013 (Other Grant/Funding Number: ZonMw)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.