Acute Effects of Different Soft Tissue Techniques on Hamstring Tightness

November 28, 2025 updated by: BEYZA YAZGAN DAĞLI, Gazi University

Comparison of the Acute Effects of Stretching, Myofascial Release, and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization in Individuals With Hamstring Tightness: Randomized Double-Blind Study

Flexibility is one of the key components of health-related physical fitness and is influenced by various factors such as age, gender, joint structure, and muscle anatomy. Hamstring tightness can contribute to multiple lower extremity injuries. While traditional methods like stretching and myofascial release are commonly used to improve flexibility, instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) has recently gained popularity. However, no studies in the current literature have compared the acute effects of these three methods in individuals with hamstring tightness. This study aims to compare the acute effects of stretching, myofascial release, and IASTM in individuals diagnosed with hamstring tightness (defined as <65° of hip flexion in the straight leg raise test without neurological findings).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hamstring tightness is a common musculoskeletal problem that can contribute to lower extremity injuries and functional limitations. Flexibility, one of the fundamental components of physical fitness, can be influenced by multiple factors including age, sex, joint structure, and muscle properties. Among various therapeutic approaches, static stretching and myofascial release are conventionally used to improve hamstring flexibility. More recently, instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) has gained popularity for its potential to increase range of motion and reduce muscle tension more rapidly than traditional methods.

The study aims to identify which intervention is most effective in increasing hamstring flexibility acutely and will provide evidence to guide clinical decision-making in sports rehabilitation and injury prevention. Additionally, this research intends to fill a gap in the literature, as no prior study has directly compared these three methods in individuals with hamstring tightness.

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial to compare the acute and short-term effects of three different manual therapy interventions such as static stretching, self-myofascial release using a vibrating foam roller, and IASTM on individuals with clinically diagnosed hamstring tightness. A fourth group will serve as the control group and will receive no intervention.

A total of 36 healthy participants, aged 18 to 30 years, with hamstring tightness confirmed via the Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test (hip flexion <65° without neurological findings), will be randomly assigned into one of four groups. Each group will consist of 9 participants. Interventions will be applied for approximately 5 minutes. Assessments will be conducted at four time points: baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after intervention, 12 hours post-intervention, and 24 hours post-intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 30 years
  • Presence of hamstring tightness (Straight Leg Raise angle < 65°)
  • No diagnosed chronic diseases
  • Voluntary participation and signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of lower extremity trauma or surgery
  • Symptoms radiating to one or both legs due to hamstring, spinal, or sciatic nerve injury
  • Ankle instability
  • Neurological findings during the straight leg raise test
  • Presence of hyperalgesia, hematoma, varicose veins, or skin infection in the lower limb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Stretching Group
Participants receive manual static hamstring stretching for 5 minutes in repeated intervals.
Manual static stretching applied to the hamstring muscle in five 30-second sets, with 30-second rest intervals. Total application time is 5 minutes.
Active Comparator: Myofascial Release Group
Participants will perform self-myofascial release using a vibrating foam roller applied to the hamstring muscles.
Vibrating foam roller (38 Hz) used for self-myofascial release applied to hamstring muscles. Three sets of 30 seconds, with 30 seconds rest between sets.
Active Comparator: Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) Group
The concave edge of an IASTM tool will be used to apply pressure along the posterior thigh.
Application of IASTM using a concave-edged tool over the posterior thigh for 5 minutes to increase tissue mobility and flexibility.
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants in the control group will not receive any therapeutic intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Hamstring Flexibility
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Hamstring flexibility will be evaluated using the passive and active Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test. An angle <65° indicates tightness. Change in hip flexion range will be measured at each time point.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Change in Knee Extension Angle
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
With the hip maintained at 90° flexion in a supine position, the passive and active knee extension angle will be measured using a goniometer. This test assesses the passive extensibility of the hamstring muscles.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Hamstring Muscle Strength
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Maximal isometric hamstring muscle strength will be measured using a handheld dynamometer.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Change in Quadriceps Muscle Strength
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Maximal isometric quadriceps strength will be assessed to evaluate potential reciprocal inhibition effects.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Functional Performance - Vertical Jump Test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Vertical jump performance will be measured to assess functional changes in lower extremity power.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Functional Performance - Single-Leg Hop Test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Single-leg horizontal hop distance will be recorded to evaluate functional lower limb performance.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Subjective Perception - Global Rating of Change Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks
Participants will rate their perception of change in hamstring flexibility using a 15-point Global Rating of Change Scale.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 3, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe