The Effect of Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia on Physical Activity in Fibromyalgia (PainLESS-2)

March 6, 2026 updated by: University of Oxford

Characterisation of Pain in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disease: a Prospective, Longitudinal, Observational Study With an Embedded Feasibility Window of Opportunity Sleep Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a digital sleep therapy program (digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia or dCBT-I) works to improve quality of life and movement in adults with fibromyalgia who also have trouble sleeping. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does digital sleep therapy improve quality of life for people with fibromyalgia?
  • Does digital sleep therapy improve sleep quality?
  • Does better sleep help reduce fear of movement and increase physical activity, assessed in a virtual reality (VR) environment?

Researchers will compare digital sleep therapy (called 'Sleepio') to standard care with sleep advice materials.

Participants will:

  • Use the Sleepio program at home for 10 weeks (6 sessions, 20 minutes each)
  • Wear a sleep monitoring device at home in bed for several nights at the start and after 3 months
  • Wear an activity watch for 1 week to track movement at the start and after 3 months
  • Complete questionnaires about pain, sleep, mood, and daily activities at the start, 3 months, and 6 months
  • Visit the study centre twice for assessments that include:

    • Pain sensitivity testing
    • A virtual reality game that measures how they move and make decisions
    • Recording of simple exercises like marching and squats

Participation in the study lasts about 6 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE Pain and sleep share a complex bidirectional relationship. In both laboratory and clinical settings, pain demonstrates circadian rhythmicity and sensitivity to sleep deprivation. Poor sleep aggravates pain, and increasing pain worsens sleep disturbance, creating a potentially self-perpetuating cycle that may contribute to the development and maintenance of chronic pain. However, the mechanisms by which sleep deprivation increases pain remain unclear, particularly in the context of fibromyalgia.

One proposed mechanism involves kinesiophobia (fear of movement), which is central to the Fear Avoidance Model of chronic pain. This model proposes that excessive fear of movement, due to the expectation that moving will cause pain, prevents people from engaging in beneficial physical activities. This avoidance leads to physical deconditioning, which further amplifies pain by reducing the engagement of endogenous descending pain control mechanisms. Understanding the mechanistic link between sleep, pain, and physical activity is particularly important in fibromyalgia, a debilitating chronic pain condition characterised by widespread pain, poor sleep, fatigue, and reduced motivation.

Polysomnography studies in fibromyalgia have demonstrated specific EEG correlates of sleep fragmentation, including alpha intrusion into slow-wave sleep, which may reflect non-restorative sleep. Observational and laboratory studies have shown behavioural changes consistent with kinesiophobia in this population. Previous research by our group has found that 73% of fibromyalgia patients fulfil criteria for clinical insomnia, with strong correlations between sleep disturbance and pain severity (R=0.44; P<0.001), fear of movement (R=0.38; P<0.001), and quality of life measures (R=0.51; P<0.001). Additionally, patient partners have explicitly identified poor sleep as a barrier to participating in physical rehabilitation and regular exercise, both of which are mainstays of fibromyalgia treatment.

RATIONALE FOR DIGITAL CBT-I Recent systematic reviews suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is associated with significant improvements in self-reported sleep quality, pain, and depression in chronic pain populations. However, existing research has important limitations: (1) it has not focused on physiological measures of sleep and activity, (2) quantitative measures of motor performance and pain have not been assessed, (3) the mechanisms by which CBT-I affects pain and physical activity remain unknown, and (4) most studies have used in-person CBT-I, which has variable delivery and limited accessibility.

Digital CBT-I (dCBT-I) addresses these limitations. It removes inter-therapist variability, ensuring consistent treatment delivery, and overcomes access barriers such as therapist shortages, long waiting lists, and travel difficulties. Sleepio, the dCBT-I program used in this study, has demonstrated effectiveness for sleep disturbance and cognitive symptoms in insomnia and has NICE accreditation.

STUDY DESIGN AND INTERVENTION This is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy of dCBT-I in improving fibromyalgia-related quality of life, pain, sleep physiology, and physical activity. The study aims to understand the mechanisms through which sleep affects pain and movement in fibromyalgia. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either Sleepio or standard care after a 4-week run-in period.

Intervention Group: Participants will receive access to Sleepio, which delivers 6 sessions of automated CBT-I over 10 weeks (approximately 20 minutes per session). The program features an animated virtual professor and includes evidence-based cognitive and behavioural interventions, sleep hygiene education, time-in-bed restriction, and relaxation exercises. Participants also have access to a daily online sleep diary, an online community, and a resource library. The program can be accessed via web browser or smartphone app at the participant's convenience. To support adherence, text reminders will be sent through REDCap, and participants will be contacted by a study investigator via telephone or video call at 1, 3, and 6 weeks.

Control Group: Participants receive standard NHS care plus written materials from Versus Arthritis providing evidence-based advice on sleep hygiene. To standardize care, the intervention group also receives access to these same sleep hygiene materials.

NOVEL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Understanding how sleep affects pain and movement requires a multi-modal measurement approach. This study employs a comprehensive assessment battery that combines subjective reports with objective physiological and behavioural measures.

Sleep Assessment Home Sleep EEG: Physiological sleep is measured using a self-applied, single-channel EEG device (SOMNOmedics Home Sleep Test HST-REM system) coupled with electrooculography (EOG), electromyography (EMG), and sensors for ambient light, activity, body position, and snoring detection. Recordings will be collected for a minimum of 4 days prior to randomisation and after treatment at 3 months. This allows assessment of sleep regularity, sleep continuity (sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, total sleep time), and sleep architecture (arousal indices, time in sleep stages).

Actigraphy: Participants will wear a research-grade actigraphy device (CamnTech MotionWatch 8) continuously for 7 days to measure rest/activity patterns, overall physical activity levels, and sleep/wake patterns in the home environment.

Under-mattress Sensor: The Withings Sleep Analyzer will be placed under the participants' home mattresses for the duration of the intervention period to continuously measure movement, heart rate, respiratory rate, body position, and snoring, providing additional data on sleep timing and estimated sleep stages.

Pain Assessment Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST): Pain sensitivity will be assessed using a standardised QST protocol developed by Rolke and the German Research Group on Neuropathic Pain. Testing measures skin sensitivity to thermal, touch, and vibration stimuli. Assessments are conducted over areas primarily affected by fibromyalgia as well as control areas not directly involved. Key parameters include mechanical pain threshold, wind-up ratio, and pressure pain thresholds. This provides objective, quantifiable measures of pain processing and central sensitization.

Electrical Pain Stimuli: Brief, mildly painful electrical stimuli are delivered during the virtual reality task using a Digitimer DS7A constant current stimulator. Pain intensity is individually calibrated prior to tasks using a standard staircase procedure, with participants' pain threshold identified and stimulus intensity set to achieve a moderately painful sensation (6/10 on a Likert scale).

Movement Assessment

The study will employ three complementary approaches to assess movement behaviour, representing a novel multi-modal evaluation of kinesiophobia and physical function:

  1. Virtual Reality (VR) Task: This laboratory-based assessment measures kinesiophobia during ecologically realistic behaviour. Participants use an HTC Vive headset to search a virtual jungle for fruit scattered on the floor. Fruits win game points, but some (distinguishable by colour) are "spiky" and trigger a brief electrical stimulus when handled. The VR environment allows precise measurement of movement patterns during motivated behaviour in ways not possible with conventional computerized tasks.

    Computational deconstruction of behaviour through statistical model-fitting yields summary parameters including: horizontal movement tendency and vertical movement tendency (the primary measures of kinesiophobia), motivational vigour (a measure of fatigue), reward sensitivity (related to mood), and pain sensitivity (related to anxiety). This paradigm was co-designed with patient partners, and pilot data validated using an experimental tonic pain model demonstrated substantial reductions in horizontal and vertical movement correlated with pain intensity.

  2. Quantitative Movement Testing (QMT): Video recordings capture participants performing three standardized physiotherapy-type movements (marching on the spot, mini squats, and forward bends) using a smartphone or tablet camera. Motion capture analysis employs university-owned software based on Detectron2, utilizing a pre-trained dilated temporal convolutional neural network (VideoPose3D) for pose extraction. This approach captures long-term temporal information with higher accuracy, simplicity, and efficiency compared to traditional recurrent neural network models.

    The system extracts 2D/3D skeletal poses and computes movement metrics such as joint angles using linear algebra operations applied to filtered 3D pose data. This provides quantifiable measures of physical ability and pain-related changes in movement. Three repetitions of each movement are recorded to assess consistency and variability. The original videos are not stored; only the computer-generated skeletal coordinate time series are retained.

  3. Actigraphy-Based Physical Activity: Home-based activity monitoring provides naturalistic data on overall physical activity levels, activity patterns throughout the day, and sedentary behaviour in the participants' usual environment.

STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND TIMELINE Participants will be followed for approximately 6 months (29 weeks) with assessments at baseline (prior to randomisation), 3 months, and 6 months. The baseline and 3-month visits include in-person assessments (approximately 2 hours each) consisting of questionnaires, QST, VR tasks, and motor evaluation, along with home-based sleep monitoring and actigraphy. The 6-month assessment consists of online questionnaires only (approximately 30 minutes). Questionnaires will be completed online via REDCap.

The 4-week run-in period before randomisation allows baseline data collection and ensures participants meet study criteria. For the intervention group, the 10-week Sleepio program begins after randomisation, with the 3-month assessment timed to capture immediate post-intervention effects.

BLINDING Researchers analysing physiological data (sleep EEG, actigraphy) and conducting statistical analyses remain blind to treatment allocation. While participants and study coordinators cannot be blinded to treatment assignment given the nature of the intervention, efforts are made to minimise bias through use of objective outcome measures and blinded data analysis.

CLINICAL CONTEXT This study is embedded within routine clinical care for fibromyalgia patients at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, and Connect Health. Participants typically face approximately 6 months waiting time from diagnosis to receiving standard NHS pain rehabilitation treatment. During this waiting period, they can choose to participate in this research study. The study design thus takes advantage of an existing clinical gap to evaluate a potentially beneficial intervention while minimising delays to standard care.

SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION

This study represents several important innovations in chronic pain and sleep research:

  1. Comprehensive mechanistic evaluation: Unlike previous studies, this trial combines physiological sleep measures (EEG), objective pain assessment (QST), and multiple modalities of movement measurement (VR, motion capture, actigraphy) to understand how sleep interventions affect pain and physical function.
  2. Novel behavioural assessment tools: The VR paradigm and motion capture system provide ecologically valid, precise, and quantifiable measures of kinesiophobia and movement that have not been previously used in CBT-I trials for chronic pain.
  3. Digital intervention consistency: Use of dCBT-I eliminates therapist variability and allows detailed monitoring of treatment engagement and adherence, facilitating better understanding of dose-response relationships.
  4. Translational approach: The integration of basic science concepts (maladaptive learning) with clinical intervention testing provides potential insights into mechanisms underlying chronic pain and treatment response.
  5. Patient-centred design: The VR task and motion capture system were co-designed with fibromyalgia patients, ensuring clinical relevance and acceptability.

POTENTIAL IMPACT If dCBT-I proves effective in improving quality of life and other outcomes in fibromyalgia, it could provide a readily accessible, scalable intervention that could be rapidly implemented in clinical practice, as Sleepio is already NICE-accredited. Understanding the mechanisms through which sleep affects pain and movement could inform development of enhanced interventions and identification of patients most likely to benefit from sleep-focused treatments. The novel assessment tools developed and validated in this study could be applied to other chronic pain populations and intervention studies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

142

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Oxford Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to provide informed consent for participation in the study
  • Male or female, aged 18 years or above
  • Clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia or chronic widespread pain
  • Concomitant insomnia, frequent nighttime waking, or early morning waking
  • Self-reported difficulties with concentration or memory
  • Reliable internet access (required to access digital intervention)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor understanding of English
  • Known neurological conditions (other than depression or anxiety) likely to independently affect pain assessment results (e.g., peripheral diabetic neuropathy)
  • Major neuropsychiatric disorder (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or psychotic spectrum disorders)
  • Epilepsy
  • Cognitive impairment, dementia, or neurodegenerative disorder
  • Recent surgery (within past 3 months) or planned surgery during study period
  • Current night-time shift work or planned night-time shift work during study period
  • Diagnosed sleep disorders including sleep apnea, restless leg syndrome, circadian rhythm disorder, or parasomnia
  • Taking prescribed sleep medications on more than 2 nights in the past 2 weeks
  • Currently receiving other psychological therapy for insomnia
  • Pregnant or lactating

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia
Participants in this arm will receive access to Sleepio, a digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I) program. The intervention consists of 6 automated sessions (approximately 20 minutes each) delivered over 10 weeks via web browser or smartphone app. Sessions include evidence-based cognitive and behavioral interventions, sleep hygiene education, time-in-bed restriction, and relaxation exercises. Participants have access to a daily online sleep diary, an online community, and library of resources. SMS reminders will be sent to encourage compliance, and participants will receive telephone or video check-ins from a study investigator at weeks 1, 3, and 6. Participants will also be provided with written sleep hygiene materials from Versus Arthritis, and continue to receive their standard NHS care
Sleepio is a digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia program consisting of 6 automated sessions delivered over 10 weeks (approximately 20 minutes per session). The program features an animated virtual professor and includes evidence-based cognitive and behavioral interventions, sleep hygiene education, sleep restriction therapy, stimulus control, cognitive restructuring, and relaxation techniques. Participants access the program via web browser or smartphone app at their convenience. The program includes a daily sleep diary, access to an online community, and a library of resources. Adherence is supported through automated text reminders via REDCap and telephone/video check-ins with research staff at weeks 1, 3, and 6 of the intervention period.
Other Names:
  • Sleepio
  • dCBT-I
Written educational materials produced by Versus Arthritis charity providing evidence-based advice on sleep hygiene for people with fibromyalgia. Materials include information booklets and links to video resources covering sleep management strategies, understanding the relationship between sleep and pain, and practical tips for improving sleep quality.
Active Comparator: Standard Care with Sleep Hygiene Education
Participants in this arm will be provided with written sleep hygiene materials from Versus Arthritis, and continue to receive their standard NHS care. Materials include information booklets and video resources on managing fibromyalgia and improving sleep. Participants do not receive access to the Sleepio digital CBT-I program but continue with routine clinical care during the study period.
Written educational materials produced by Versus Arthritis charity providing evidence-based advice on sleep hygiene for people with fibromyalgia. Materials include information booklets and links to video resources covering sleep management strategies, understanding the relationship between sleep and pain, and practical tips for improving sleep quality.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fibromyalgia-Related Quality of Life (FIQR)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Change in fibromyalgia-related quality of life measured by the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) at 3 and 6 months. The FIQR is a 21-item validated questionnaire assessing the impact of fibromyalgia on physical function, overall impact, and symptom severity. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impact of fibromyalgia on quality of life.
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep Quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Subjective sleep quality measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 3 and 6 months. The PSQI is a validated 19-item questionnaire assessing seven components of sleep. The global score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Change in Pain Severity (Numerical Rating Scale)
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of follow up at 6 months
Change in pain severity measured by the Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Participants rate their average pain intensity over the past week on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), measured at 3 and 6 months. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.
From enrollment to end of follow up at 6 months
Fear of Movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Fear of movement and re-injury measured by the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), measured at 3 and 6 months. The TSK is a 17-item validated questionnaire assessing fear of movement and activity avoidance due to fear of pain or re-injury. Total scores range from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement.
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Fatigue (Chalder Fatigue Scale)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Self-reported fatigue measured by the Chalder Fatigue Scale. This 11-item validated questionnaire assesses physical and mental fatigue. Total scores range from 0 to 33, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue severity.
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Depression Symptoms (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Depressive symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). This 9-item validated questionnaire assesses depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 representing mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Anxiety symptoms measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. This 7-item validated questionnaire assesses anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with scores of 5, 10, and 15 representing mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively.
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Insomnia Severity (Insomnia Severity Index)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Insomnia severity measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). This 7-item validated questionnaire assesses the nature, severity, and impact of insomnia symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 28, with scores of 8-14 indicating subthreshold insomnia, 15-21 indicating moderate clinical insomnia, and 22-28 indicating severe clinical insomnia.
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 6 months
Sleep Quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 6 months
Subjective sleep quality measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 3 months. The PSQI is a validated 19-item questionnaire assessing seven components of sleep. Global scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 6 months
Change in horizontal movement tendency
Time Frame: From enrollment to 3 months' follow-up
Horizontal movement tendency assessed using a laboratory-based virtual reality (VR) task measuring motion during ecologically realistic motivated behaviour. Participants search a virtual jungle environment for fruit while some fruits deliver mild electrical stimuli.
From enrollment to 3 months' follow-up
Change in vertical movement tendency
Time Frame: From enrollment to 3 months' follow-up
Vertical movement tendency assessed using a laboratory-based virtual reality (VR) task measuring motion during ecologically realistic motivated behaviour. Participants search a virtual jungle environment for fruit while some fruits deliver mild electrical stimuli.
From enrollment to 3 months' follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep continuity on EEG
Time Frame: From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Change in observed time spent asleep measured by home-based single-channel EEG monitoring (SOMNOmedics HST-REM system) over a minimum of 4 consecutive nights.
From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Sleep architecture on EEG
Time Frame: From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Change in objective sleep architecture (i.e. proportion of time in different sleep stages: REM, NREM Stages 1, 2, 3, and 4) measured by home-based single-channel EEG monitoring (SOMNOmedics HST-REM system) over a minimum of 4 consecutive nights.
From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Sleep spectral power on EEG
Time Frame: From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Change in sleep spectra distribution (i.e. delta, theta, alpha, sigma, beta, gamma wavebands) measured by home-based single-channel EEG monitoring (SOMNOmedics HST-REM system) over a minimum of 4 consecutive nights.
From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Mechanical pain threshold on QST
Time Frame: From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Change in mechanical pain threshold assessed using standardised Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) following the protocol developed by Rolke and the German Research Group on Neuropathic Pain.
From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Wind-up ratio on QST
Time Frame: From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Change in Wind-Up Ratio assessed using standardised Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) following the protocol developed by Rolke and the German Research Group on Neuropathic Pain.
From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Pressure pain thresholds on QST
Time Frame: From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Change in pressure pain threshold assessed using standardised Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) following the protocol developed by Rolke and the German Research Group on Neuropathic Pain.
From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Total physical activity on actigraphy
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in total physical activity on actigraphy measured over a minimum of 7 consecutive days at each timepoint.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in allocation of activity levels on actigraphy
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in proportion of time spent in sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity on actigraphy measured over a minimum of 7 consecutive days at each timepoint.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in circadian patterns of activity on actigraphy
Time Frame: From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Change in daily activity patterns on actigraphy measured over a minimum of 7 consecutive days at each timepoint.
From enrolment to three months' follow-up
Change in joint angle on movement
Time Frame: From enrollment to 3 months' follow-up
Objective movement quality during standardised physiotherapy exercises (marching in place, mini squats, forward bends) assessed using video-based motion capture analysis. Higher joint angles indicate better physical function and less pain-related movement limitation.
From enrollment to 3 months' follow-up
Change in movement speeds
Time Frame: From enrollment to 3 months' follow-up
Objective movement speeds during standardised physiotherapy exercises (marching in place, mini squats, forward bends) assessed using video-based motion capture analysis. Automated software extracts 3D skeletal poses and computes movement speed. Three repetitions of each exercise are performed. Higher movement speeds indicate better physical function and less pain-related movement limitation.
From enrollment to 3 months' follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ben Seymour, PhD, University of Oxford
  • Principal Investigator: Anushka Soni, DPhil, anushka.soni@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia

Subscribe