Improving Sleep in Rehabilitation After Stroke (INSPIRES)

August 22, 2025 updated by: University of Oxford

An Investigation Into the Efficacy of Online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia ("Sleepio") to Improve Sleep After Stroke.

This study evaluates the efficacy of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (Sleepio) in chronic stroke survivors. Half of the participants will receive access to the digital (online) programme, half will receive a leaflet with sleep hygiene information. The primary outcome will be changes in sleep quality, assessed as the score on the Sleep Condition Indicator.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke is one of the leading causes of adult disability. Many stroke survivors report difficulties with sleep and our current research confirms this, indicating that chronic community dwelling stroke survivors experience poorer self-reported and objective sleep quality than age matched healthy controls.

"Sleepio" is an online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) programme. The efficacy of this intervention has been demonstrated in people with chronic insomnia but has not yet been tested in people with stroke. The study therefore aims to determine whether digital CBT-I is effective for improving sleep quality in chronic stroke survivors. Participants will be randomised to receive either digital (online) CBT-I or a leaflet with sleep hygiene information. The primary outcome is the change in self-reported sleep quality, assessed using the Sleep Condition Indicator. Secondary outcomes include changes in sleep fragmentation and wake after sleep onset assessed with actigraphy, self-reported sleep onset latency from the sleep diaries, anxiety and depression using the PHQ9 and GAD7, quality of life using the SIS-8 and EQ-5D-5L as well as changes in healthcare costs during the 8 week follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • At least 18 years of age
  • At least 3 months post stroke
  • Interest in improving sleep
  • Can understand verbal and written English well enough to engage with the programme and study procedures (with assistance from carer if needed).
  • Reliable access to internet
  • Currently living in the United Kingdom
  • Current stable health

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious physical health concerns with surgery scheduled in the next 5 months
  • Undergoing a psychological treatment programme for insomnia (with a health professional or online)
  • Pregnancy
  • Uncontrolled seizures
  • Untreated diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea
  • Habitual night shift, evening or rotating shift-workers
  • Other serious clinical condition that may affect participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital CBT-I
6 weeks digital (online) cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia
6 weeks of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (Sleepio) delivered online
Other Names:
  • Sleepio
Active Comparator: Sleep hygiene information
Leaflet of sleep hygiene information
A leaflet detailing advice to improve sleep through changes in sleep hygiene

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep Condition Indicator Score at Post-intervention, Adjusted for Baseline Score and Sex
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Self-reported sleep quality questionnaire, range 0-32, higher numbers indicate better sleep quality Assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Outcome is post-intervention score after adjustment for baseline score and sex using Analysis of Covariance
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep Condition Indicator Score at 8 Week Follow up Adjusted for Baseline Score
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Self-reported sleep quality questionnaire, range 0-32, higher scores indicate better sleep quality. Assessed at baseline and 8 week follow up. Outcome is follow up score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance.
16 weeks
Sleep Fragmentation, Assessed at Post-intervention Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Sleep fragmentation assessed using actigraphy. Higher values indicate more disrupted (worse) sleep. The minimum value is 0. There is no specified maximum value. According to the manual for the software which does the calculation the definition of sleep fragmentation index is "the sum of the Mobile time (%)' and the 'Immobile bouts <=1min (%)".There are no units associated with sleep fragmentation. The values are never presented in the literature or elsewhere as a percentage and therefore they are not presented as a percentage here. Assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Outcome is post-intervention score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance.
8 weeks
Sleep Fragmentation at 8 Week Follow up Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Sleep fragmentation assessed using actigraphy. Higher values indicate more disrupted (worse) sleep. The minimum value is 0. There is no specified maximum value. According to the manual for the software that does the calculation, the definition of sleep fragmentation index is "the sum of the Mobile time (%)' and the 'Immobile bouts <=1min (%)".There are no units associated with sleep fragmentation. The values are never presented in the literature or elsewhere as a percentage and therefore they are not presented as a percentage here. Assessed at baseline and 8 week follow up. Outcome is follow up score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance
16 weeks
Wake After Sleep Onset at Post-intervention Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Wake after sleep onset assessed using actigraphy, higher values (minutes) indicate more disrupted sleep. Assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Outcome is post-intervention score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance
8 weeks
Wake After Sleep Onset at 8 Week Follow up Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Wake after sleep onset assessed using actigraphy, higher values (minutes) indicate more disrupted sleep. Assessed at baseline and 8 week follow up. Outcome is follow up score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance.
16 weeks
Change in Sleep Onset Latency
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Sleep onset latency assessed using online sleep diary, higher values indicate poorer sleep quality
8 weeks
Self-reported Depression Post-intervention, Assessed as PHQ9 Score at Post-intervention Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 8 weeks
PHQ9 score, range 0-20, higher values indicate more depressive symptoms. Assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Outcome is post-intervention score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance
8 weeks
Self-reported Depression at 8 Week Follow up, Assessed as PHQ9 Score at 8 Week Follow up Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 16 weeks
PHQ9 score, range 0-20, higher values indicate more depressive symptoms. Assessed at baseline and 8 week follow up. Outcome is follow up score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance
16 weeks
Self-reported Anxiety at Post-intervention, Assessed as GAD7 Score Post-intervention Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 8 weeks
GAD7 score, range 0-21, higher values indicate more anxiety symptoms. Assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Outcome is post-intervention score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance
8 weeks
Self-reported Anxiety at 8 Week Follow up, Assessed as GAD7 Score at 8 Week Follow up Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 16 weeks
GAD7 score, range 0-21, higher values indicate more anxiety symptoms. Assessed at baseline and 8 week follow up. Outcome is follow up score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance
16 weeks
Stroke Specific Quality of Life, Assessed as SIS Index Post-intervention Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 8 weeks
SIS-8 index, range 0-100, higher values less impact of stroke on quality of life. Assessed at baseline and post-interventin. Outcome is post-intervention score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance
8 weeks
Stroke Specific Quality of Life at 8 Week Follow up, Assessed as SIS Index at 8 Week Follow up Adjusted for Baseline
Time Frame: 16 weeks
SIS-8 index, range 0-100, higher values indicate less impact of stroke on quality of life. Assessed at baseline and 8 week follow up. Outcome is follow up score after adjustment for baseline score using Analysis of Covariance
16 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost Effectiveness
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Assessed as incremental cost effectiveness ratio, using EQ-5D-5L, range 0-5 for each dimension, higher values indicate more problems
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heidi Johansen-Berg, PhD, University of Oxford, UK

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data are available upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Following publication of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Available upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia

Subscribe