Septum-guided Segmentectomy for Deep Early-stage Lung Cancer (SGS2512) (SGS2512)

April 26, 2026 updated by: Junfeng Geng, Shanghai Chest Hospital

Effectiveness and Safety of Septum-guided Segmentectomy in Solid-dominant, Deep-seated Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (≤2 cm): A Single-center, Prospective, Single-arm Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a specialized surgical technique called "Septum-guided Segmentectomy" for treating early-stage lung cancer located deep within the lung tissue.Standard surgery for lung cancer often involves removing an entire lung lobe (lobectomy), which can significantly reduce a patient's breathing capacity. For small tumors, removing only a segment of the lung (segmentectomy) can preserve more healthy tissue. However, for tumors located deep in the lung, traditional segmentectomy is technically challenging and risks leaving cancer cells behind.In this study, surgeons will use the natural anatomical boundaries-the intersegmental veins and their surrounding thin membranes (septa)-as a guide to precisely remove the target lung segment. This "septum-guided" approach aims to ensure the cancer is completely removed while maximizing the preservation of healthy lung function.Participants will be followed for 3 years after surgery to monitor for cancer recurrence and assess their long-term recovery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, prospective, single-arm clinical trial (SGS2512) designed to validate the oncological safety and technical feasibility of septum-guided segmentectomy for deep-seated, solid-dominant early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Background: While segmentectomy has been proven comparable to lobectomy for small peripheral NSCLC (≤2 cm), its application for deep-seated lesions (inner 2/3 of the lung) remains controversial. Traditional methods rely on fixed safety margins, which are often difficult to achieve in deep regions without sacrificing excessive lung tissue. This study utilizes the "intersegmental septum" as a natural barrier to define the resection boundary.Key Procedures:Surgical Technique: All procedures are performed via single-port VATS or Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS). The core technique involves the identification and exposure of the intersegmental veins and the corresponding septa to guide the separation of the target segment.Intraoperative Second Registration: After surgery begins but before the segment is resected, a second check is performed. If frozen section pathology reveals lymph node metastasis or if the anatomical structure is unsuitable for segmentectomy, the procedure will be converted to a standard lobectomy to ensure patient safety.Follow-up: Patients will undergo regular chest CT scans, tumor marker tests, and pulmonary function tests at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months postoperatively.Statistical Design:

The study uses an A'Hern single-stage design to evaluate the primary endpoint. With a null hypothesis (H0) of 3-year RFS ≤ 81% and an alternative hypothesis (H1) of 3-year RFS ≥ 91%, a total of 89 participants are planned for enrollment to ensure 80 evaluable cases. Data analysis will be performed using R software (version 4.0 or above).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

89

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200030
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Junfeng Geng, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Clinical stage IA (cT1a-bN0M0)
  • tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm
  • Pathological feature: Solid-dominant lesion (CTR > 0.5)
  • Tumor location: Deep-seated within the lung parenchyma (inner 2/3), defined as the tumor center being located in the inner 2/3 region of the lung field on axial, coronal, and sagittal CT views
  • ECOG Performance Status: 0-1
  • Pulmonary function: FEV1 ≥ 60% predicted and DLCO SB ≥ 60% predicted
  • Participants must be willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple pulmonary nodules or evidence of distant metastasis
  • Intraoperative confirmation of lymph node metastasis (N1/N2) or pleural dissemination
  • History of previous ipsilateral lung surgery
  • History of other malignant tumors within the past 5 years
  • Presence of severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases that preclude surgical tolerance
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Septum-guided Segmentectomy
Participants with solid-dominant, deep-seated early-stage NSCLC will undergo septum-guided segmentectomy. The core technique involves identifying and utilizing the intersegmental veins and their surrounding fibrous septa as the anatomical boundaries for precise resection. Systemic lymph node sampling or dissection (at least 3 hilar and 3 mediastinal groups) is mandatory for all patients. An intraoperative second registration will be performed to ensure the oncological appropriateness of the procedure before resection.
This procedure is performed via single-port VATS or Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS). The core technique involves the precise identification of the intersegmental veins and their surrounding fibrous sheath (septum). These natural anatomical boundaries are utilized to guide the separation and resection of the target lung segment. Unlike traditional methods that rely on fixed safety margins, this approach focuses on anatomical planes to ensure oncological safety for deep-seated lesions. Systematic lymph node sampling or dissection of at least 3 hilar and 3 mediastinal groups is mandatory. An intraoperative second registration is conducted to confirm the nodal status and anatomical suitability before finalizing the resection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-year Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS)
Time Frame: 3 years post-operation
Percentage of participants who are alive and free of any recurrence (including local, regional, or distant recurrence) at 3 years after the surgery. Recurrence is defined from the date of surgery to the date of first evidence of recurrence by imaging (CT, PET-CT, or MRI) or biopsy.
3 years post-operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operation time
Time Frame: During surgery (Day 0)
The total duration of the surgical procedure, measured from the initial skin incision to the completion of skin closure.
During surgery (Day 0)
Intraoperative Blood Loss
Time Frame: During surgery (Day 0)
The total volume of blood lost during the surgical procedure, estimated by measuring the volume of suctioned fluid and weighing the surgical sponges.
During surgery (Day 0)
Incidence of Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: From surgery through 30 days post-operation
The percentage of participants experiencing one or more postoperative complications. Complications will be categorized and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system (focusing on Grade II or higher).
From surgery through 30 days post-operation
Technical Success of Septum-guided Segmentectomy
Time Frame: During surgery and up to the availability of the final pathology report (typically within 7 days post-operation)
Assessment of the surgical quality, including the R0 resection rate (no microscopic tumor cells at the margin) and the intact exposure rate of intersegmental veins.
During surgery and up to the availability of the final pathology report (typically within 7 days post-operation)
Change in Pulmonary Function (FEV1)
Time Frame: Pre-operation, 6 months, and 12 months post-operation
Comparison of the Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) between preoperative baseline and postoperative follow-ups to assess the preservation of lung function.
Pre-operation, 6 months, and 12 months post-operation
Local Recurrence Rate
Time Frame: Up to 3 years post-operation
Incidence of recurrence occurring at the surgical margin, the remaining ipsilateral lung lobe, or the ipsilateral intrathoracic lymph nodes.
Up to 3 years post-operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices), will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 6 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author (Junfeng Geng). To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Septum-guided Segmentectomy

Subscribe