Contribution of 3D Printing in Anatomical Lung Segmentectomies. (3DiLUNG)

January 12, 2023 updated by: Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Contribution of 3D Printing in Anatomical Lung Segmentectomies: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

The aim of the present work was to evaluate if the presence on the operating field of a 3D printed personalized model of the pulmonary anatomy of a patient operated by full thoracoscopy for an anatomical segmentectomy, makes it possible to reduce the mental workload and the fatigue of the surgeon.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Between 28.10.2020 and 05.10.2021, we successively included all anatomic segmentectomies performed by full thoracoscopy in our department, except for S6 segmentectomies, S4+5 left bisegmentectomy and patients for whom the time to surgery was considered too short to obtain the 3D printed model before surgery.

We performed a prospective randomized controlled pilot trial on 2 parallel arms:

  • The "Digital" arm
  • The "Digital+Object" arm.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (thoracic surgery department)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

all anatomic segmentectomies performed by full thoracoscopy in our department.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all anatomic segmentectomies performed by full thoracoscopy, except for S6 segmentectomies, S4+5 left bisegmentectomy and patients for whom the time to surgery was considered too short to obtain the 3D printed model before surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • S6 segmentectomies
  • S4+5 left bisegmentectomy
  • Patients for whom the time to surgery was considered too short to obtain the 3D printed model before surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
The "Digital" arm
Surgeons had a virtual 3D reconstruction of the patient's pulmonary anatomy by the Visible Patient Planning (VP) software
Lung resection
The "Digital+Object" arm
Surgeons had at their disposal on the operating field, in a transparent sterile bag, the 3D printed model, made from the virtual 3D VP software of the patient's lung anatomy
Lung resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgeon's mental workload.
Time Frame: 1 day
measure of mental workload by the NASA-TLX score at the end of the surgery: It is a multidimensional rating scale that has six bipolar dimensions: mental demand (MD); physical demand (PD); time demand (TD); self performance (P); effort (E); and frustration (F). The dimensions thus reflect tasks (DM, PD, TD), performance (P), and behavioral factors (E and F). NASA-TLX is calculated through a self-questionnaire, using 20-point visual analogue scales anchored by very low and very high. The test provides a global load score between zero and 100 and by sub-dimensions, higher scores indicating higher mental loads of subjective perceptions.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The surgeon's stress during surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
To assess stress, the surgeon wore a Holter device throughout the surgical procedure
1 day
Surgeon's attention to work by d2-R test
Time Frame: 1 day

For the evaluation of the surgeon's attention to work at the end of the surgery, we used first d2-R test.

Scoring of the d2-R test included the following: concentration performance (CC), which represents the capacity of concentration; total number of target items processed, included the omitted ones (CCT), which informs about the speed of processing the test; percentage of errors (E%) which is defined as (total number of errors x 100)/CCT, and reflects performance accuracy.

These scores are standardized to standard score (NS), used by default for the computerized d2-R. The NS ranges from 20 to 80, with an average of 50. In the normal distribution scale of the d2-R test, 7% of the normative subjects scored under 35, 24% scored between 35 and 44, 38% scored between 45 and 55, 24% scored from 56 to 65 and 7% scored over 65. The scores are consider very weak, weak, mean, high and very high, respectively.

1 day
Surgeon's attention to work by EncephalApp Stroop test.
Time Frame: 1 day

For the evaluation of the surgeon's attention to work at the end of the surgery, we used also EncephalApp Stroop test.

The task has two components: "off" and "on" states. In the "off " state, the surgeon views a pound signs (###) presented in red, green, or blue, one at a time and has to respond as quickly as possible by touching the matching color of the stimulus to the colors displayed at the bottom of the screen. In the "on" state the subject has to accurately select the color of the word presented, which is actually the name of the color in discordant coloring. The specific outcomes of the EncephalApp Stroop test were: the total time for five correct runs in the "off " state (OffTime) and in the "on" state (OnTime); the number of runs needed to complete the five correct "off" runs and five correct "on" runs.

1 day
The surgeon's overall satisfaction at the end of the surgery.
Time Frame: 1 day
To assess surgeon subjective satisfaction at the end of the surgery, we used a subjective satisfaction 5-point Likert scale
1 day
Duration of the surgical procedure
Time Frame: 1 day
calculated from the skin incision to the completion of the segmentectomy
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Madalina Grigoroiu, dr, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thoracic Surgery

Clinical Trials on Segmentectomy

3
Subscribe