Rectal Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy-Real World Study (RC-NAT-RWS)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Yao Hongwei, Beijing Friendship Hospital

Establishing a Strategy for Selecting Watchful Waiting and Determining the Optimal Timing for Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Therapy

This study aims to utilise a real-world data platform to integrate multi-omics data-including radiomics, gut microbiota, pathological quality control and liquid biopsy-to construct a multidimensional predictive model for the efficacy of rectal cancer treatment following neoadjuvant therapy. By integrating multimodal data, the study aims to accurately assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy and identify patients suitable for a 'watch-and-wait' strategy, thereby achieving tumour control and preserving organ function without the need for surgery. Furthermore, it seeks to provide scientific evidence for the efficacy of the 'watch-and-wait' strategy and the selection of optimal timing for surgery, whilst validating the model's effectiveness and assessing its clinical feasibility through prospective clinical trials.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Optimisation and predictive modelling of immunotherapy combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Through real-world studies, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, focusing on comparing outcomes with traditional chemoradiotherapy regimens to optimise neoadjuvant treatment protocols. By integrating radiomics and molecular subtyping data, we will develop a deep learning model to predict the rate of pathological complete response, thereby accurately forecasting treatment outcomes for patients. This model can further optimise personalised treatment decisions, enhance the effectiveness of organ-preservation strategies, and ultimately reduce surgical trauma for patients.
  2. A Treatment Efficacy Assessment System Combining Multi-omics Data with Artificial Intelligence Integrate multi-omics data (such as molecular subtyping, radiomics, and pathological assessment) with artificial intelligence technology to establish a treatment efficacy assessment system. Utilise deep learning models to analyse pre- and post-treatment imaging data and pathological samples, thereby achieving precise efficacy assessment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

869

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100050

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is informed and has provided written informed consent;
  • Rectal adenocarcinoma confirmed by colonoscopic biopsy and pathology, meeting the following criteria:

    1. Clinical stage II/III locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): cT1-4aN0-2M0;
    2. The distal edge of the tumor is ≤ 10 cm from the anal verge (measured by MRI);
    3. No distant metastasis;
    4. Scheduled to receive neoadjuvant therapy;
  • Age ≥ 18 years, male or female。

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of distant organ metastasis;
  • Multiple primary colorectal cancers;
  • History of prior malignancy (except completely cured carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal cell carcinoma, or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Neoadjuvant Therapy Cohort for Rectal Cancer
This study is a multicentre, real-world evidence (RWE) study designed to evaluate clinical treatment regimens that offer greater benefits to patients. It will provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians in China regarding the selection of comprehensive treatment regimens for patients with advanced rectal cancer, thereby further refining and optimising clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer; it will also explore new treatment strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the era of immunotherapy. Study design: A combination of prospective observational and retrospective cohort studies. The primary endpoint is the complete response rate (pathological complete response and clinical complete response).
non-interventional study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the complete response rates across different treatments.
Time Frame: Post-neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy Assessment Time Point (within 8-12 weeks after radiotherapy completion)
Compare the complete response rates (including pathological complete response [pCR] and clinical complete response [cCR]) between a neoadjuvant regimen combining chemoradiotherapy with immunotherapy and the traditional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Post-neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy Assessment Time Point (within 8-12 weeks after radiotherapy completion)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety profile
Time Frame: 20 weeks after the first radiotherapy session
Adverse Events (AEs): Type, incidence, severity, and relationship to the study treatment. Severity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0 (NCI-CTCAE v5.0).
20 weeks after the first radiotherapy session
Therapy Tolerability
Time Frame: 20 weeks after the first radiotherapy session
The proportions of patients with dose interruption, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation during the neoadjuvant treatment period, all due to treatment-related toxicity.
20 weeks after the first radiotherapy session
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: within 5 years after completion of neoadjuvant therapy
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) is a key endpoint (a measure of outcome) used primarily in oncology clinical trials, especially for evaluating adjuvant or curative treatments.
within 5 years after completion of neoadjuvant therapy

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: within 5 years after completion of neoadjuvant therapy
Overall Survival (OS) is the primary and most objective endpoint in oncology clinical trials. It measures the time from a defined starting point (e.g., date of diagnosis, randomization in a trial, or start of treatment) until death from any cause.
within 5 years after completion of neoadjuvant therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on This study is a multicenter, real-world, non-interventional study.

Subscribe