Use of Copeptin Measurement After Arginine Infusion for the Differential Diagnosis of Diabetes Insipidus - the CARGOx Study (CARGOx)

July 24, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

The differential diagnosis of central diabetes insipidus (cDI) is difficult and the current test with the highest diagnostic accuracy is copeptin measurement after hypertonic saline infusion (HIS). Although the HIS improved diagnostic accuracy compared to the standard water deprivation test used for decades before, it still comprises great discomfort for patients due to the rise in serum sodium levels above 149mmol/l and requires the presence of medical staff at all times to guarantee safety of the test.

The arginine stimulation test is routinely used to stimulate growth hormone. Own data in 52 patients with polyuria / polydipsia syndrome showed that arginine infusion is a potent stimulator of the neurohypophysis and provides a new diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of cDI. Copeptin measurements upon arginine stimulation (CAS) discriminated patients with diabetes insipidus vs. patients with primary polydipsia with a high diagnostic accuracy of 94%.

To validate these results and to compare them against the HIS a large multicenter trial is needed, where the diagnostic accuracy of the CAS is compared to the HIS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

177

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Belo Horizonte, Brazil
        • Hospital das clinicas Minas Gerais
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • University Hospital Würzburg
      • Milan, Italy
        • Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus MC
      • Zürich, Switzerland
        • University Hospital Zurich
    • Basel Stadt
      • Basel, Basel Stadt, Switzerland, 4031
        • University Hospital Basel, Department of Endocrinology
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Cambridge university hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Hypotonic polyuria / polydipsia syndrome defined as: polyuria >50ml/kg body weight/24h and polydipsia >3l /24h or known diabetes insipidus under treatment with DDAVP
  • Urine-Osmolality <800mOsm/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Polyuria / polydipsia secondary to diabetes mellitus, hypercalcemia or hypokalemia
  • Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (defined as baseline copeptin level >21.4pmol/L)
  • Evidence of any acute illness
  • Epilepsy requiring treatment
  • Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (blood pressure >160/100mmHg at baseline)
  • Cardiac failure (NYHA III-IV)
  • Liver cirrhosis (Child B-C)
  • Uncorrected adrenal or thyroidal deficiency
  • Patients refusing or unable to give written informed consent
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • End of life care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arginine Infusion
Arginine Stimulation Test
Intravenous Infusion of Arginine is given, copeptin measurement will be collected before and 60minutes after start of infusion
Active Comparator: Hypertonic saline infusion
Hypertonic Saline Infusion Test
Intravenous Infusion of hypertonic Saline is given, copeptin measurement will be collected before and once Plasma sodium rises above 149mmol/l

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcome is the overall diagnostic accuracy - defined as the proportion of correct diagnoses - of each diagnostic procedure in differentiating patients with central diabetes insipidus from patients with primary polydipsia.
Time Frame: 2 days
For Arginine stimulation the copeptin cut-off to differentiate between diabetes insipidus and primary polydipsia will be 3.8 pmol/l after 60 minutes, for hypertonic saline stimulation it will be the copeptin cut-off 4.9 pmol/l taken at the end of the test
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best fit diagnostic copeptin cut-off values for differentiation between each diagnosis (Primary polydipsia, partial and complete central Diabetes insipidus) upon arginine stimulation and hypertonic saline infusion stimulation
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Frequency and severity of thirst assessed by visual analogue scale during both tests
Time Frame: 2 days (1 for each test)
assessed by visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 10 indicating severe symptoms.
2 days (1 for each test)
Frequency and severity of headache assessed by visual analogue scale during both tests
Time Frame: 2 days (1 for each test)
assessed by visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 10 indicating severe symptoms.
2 days (1 for each test)
Frequency and severity of nausea assessed by visual analogue scale during both tests
Time Frame: 2 days (1 for each test)
assessed by visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 10 indicating severe symptoms.
2 days (1 for each test)
Frequency and severity of vertigo assessed by visual analogue scale during both tests
Time Frame: 2 days (1 for each test)
assessed by visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 10 indicating severe symptoms.
2 days (1 for each test)
Frequency and severity of general malaise assessed by visual analogue scale during both tests
Time Frame: 2 days (1 for each test)
assessed by visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 10 indicating severe symptoms.
2 days (1 for each test)
Subjective burden assessed by visual analogue scale of both tests
Time Frame: 2 days (1 for each test)
assessed by visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 10 indicating severe symptoms.
2 days (1 for each test)
Health care costs of both tests
Time Frame: 2 days (1 for each test)
2 days (1 for each test)
Frequency of test preference at follow up visit
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Sensitivity of both diagnostic procedures for each diagnosis (Primary polydipsia, partial and complete central Diabetes insipidus) according to recommended diagnostic test criteria and previously generated cutoff values
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)

Copeptin cut-offs used:

Arginine stimulation:

  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes < 2.4 pmol/l = complete central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes 2.4 - 3.8 pmol/l = partial central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes > 3.8 pmol/l = primary polydipsia

Hypertonic saline stimulation:

  • Copeptin level < 2.7 pmol/l = complete central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level 2.7 - 4.9 pmol/l = partial central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level > 4.9 pmol/l = primary polydipsia
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Specificity of both diagnostic procedures for each diagnosis (Primary polydipsia, partial and complete central Diabetes insipidus) according to recommended diagnostic test criteria and previously generated cutoff values
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)

Copeptin cut-offs used:

Arginine stimulation:

  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes < 2.4 pmol/l = complete central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes 2.4 - 3.8 pmol/l = partial central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes > 3.8 pmol/l = primary polydipsia

Hypertonic saline stimulation:

  • Copeptin level < 2.7 pmol/l = complete central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level 2.7 - 4.9 pmol/l = partial central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level > 4.9 pmol/l = primary polydipsia
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Positive predictive value of both diagnostic procedures for each diagnosis (Primary polydipsia, partial and complete central Diabetes insipidus) according to recommended diagnostic test criteria and previously generated cutoff values
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)

Copeptin cut-offs used:

Arginine stimulation:

  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes < 2.4 pmol/l = complete central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes 2.4 - 3.8 pmol/l = partial central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes > 3.8 pmol/l = primary polydipsia

Hypertonic saline stimulation:

  • Copeptin level < 2.7 pmol/l = complete central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level 2.7 - 4.9 pmol/l = partial central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level > 4.9 pmol/l = primary polydipsia
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Negative predictive value of both diagnostic procedures for each diagnosis (Primary polydipsia, partial and complete central Diabetes insipidus) according to recommended diagnostic test criteria and previously generated cutoff values
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)

Copeptin cut-offs used:

Arginine stimulation:

  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes < 2.4 pmol/l = complete central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes 2.4 - 3.8 pmol/l = partial central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level at 60 minutes > 3.8 pmol/l = primary polydipsia

Hypertonic saline stimulation:

  • Copeptin level < 2.7 pmol/l = complete central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level 2.7 - 4.9 pmol/l = partial central diabetes insipidus
  • Copeptin level > 4.9 pmol/l = primary polydipsia
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Accuracy of the copeptin cut-off of 3.7 pmol/l after 60 minutes and 4.1 after 90 minutes for Arginine Stimulation test
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Sensitivity of the copeptin cut-off of 3.7 pmol/l after 60 minutes and 4.1 after 90 minutes for Arginine Stimulation test
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Specificity of the copeptin cut-off of 3.7 pmol/l after 60 minutes and 4.1 after 90 minutes for Arginine Stimulation test
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Accuracy of the copeptin cut-off of 6.5 pmol/l for Hypertonic Saline Infusion test
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Sensitivity of the copeptin cut-off of 6.5 pmol/l for Hypertonic Saline Infusion test
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
Specificity of the copeptin cut-off of 6.5 pmol/l for Hypertonic Saline Infusion test
Time Frame: 2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)
2 days (1 day for each test, evaluation diagnostic accuracy at end of trial)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Insipidus

Clinical Trials on Arginine infusion

3
Subscribe