The Referral to Hepatology Can be Improved Through an Electronic Medical Record (EMR)-Based Best Practice Alert (BPA) for an Appropriate Referral

May 6, 2026 updated by: University of Kansas Medical Center
The purpose of this study is to promote the diagnosis and awareness of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) by linkage of care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an extremely common condition affecting 26% of the US general population but only 2% of the population has a more aggressive histological phenotype, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or evidence of liver fibrosis[1]. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) does not recommend routine screening of the general population for NAFLD[2] citing "uncertainties surrounding diagnostic tests and treatment options[3]", but does recommend referral to a hepatologist when there is a high index of suspicion for NASH and advanced fibrosis such as in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D)[4-6], and in those with elevated fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) [7, 8]. These aids are under-utilized by physicians that result in many patients who are at high risk for fibrosis and are not referred to hepatology[9]. Confusion regarding how to best define the population at risk is a major problem preventing the appropriate use of hepatology referral in the primary care setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Providers from internal medicine, family medicine and endocrinology clinics.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Providers may choose to opt-out from this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Unit:
Providers from internal medicine, family medicine and endocrinology clinics.
To determine if rates of screening and referral to hepatology can be improved through an EMR-based BPA for an appropriate referral.
Other: Observation Unit:
Patients from internal medicine, family medicine, and endocrinology clinics. Patients with an ICD 10 diagnosis of T2D E11.9. Patients have the most recent calculated FIB-4 Score of >3.25.
The only intervention is the Best Practice Alert (BPA). Providers from three departments will be randomized to one of two groups: one that receives a BPA and one that does not. Thereafter, the study will observe patients who fit criteria for NASH referral, as defined by a diagnosis of T2DM and appropriate Fib4 score to determine if they have been referred to Hepatology for assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine if rates of referral to hepatology can be improved through EMR-based Best Practice Alert (BPA) for an appropriate referral. Name of the specific primary outcome measure
Time Frame: 12 months
Quantify the number of new referrals from providers who opt-in to have BPA notifications.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Winston Dunn, MD, University of Kansas Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases

Clinical Trials on Best Practice Alert

Subscribe