Pragmatic Trial Of Alerts for Use of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (PROMPT-MRA)

August 22, 2024 updated by: Yale University

Pragmatic Trial Of Messaging to Providers About Treatment With Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

The primary objective of this study is to determine if a best practice alert (BPA) system that prompts providers to consider the addition of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) in eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) will result in increased prescription of this guideline-recommended therapy. The system will also inform providers about FDA-approved potassium binders for the treatment of hyperkalemia if elevated potassium is a barrier for MRA use and will provide educational information on the evidence for MRA therapy in these patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite the robust literature demonstrating improved outcomes with the use of mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), MRAs continue to be underused in clinical practice. This underuse often stems from the perceived risks of hyperkalemia, including a prior history of hyperkalemia and acute or chronic kidney disease, as well as the cautioned use for those with potassium greater than 5.0 mEq/L, as recommended in national societal guidelines. New potassium binders have recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat hyperkalemia. It remains unknown if a best practice alert built into the clinical electronic health record can facilitate MRA prescription in eligible patients by providing guideline-based information about MRA recommendations and evidence, as well as informing practitioners about available treatments for hyperkalemia.

This is a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, open-label interventional trial to test the comparative effectiveness of an EHR BPA system that informs practitioners about MRAs for HFrEF and, if necessary, potassium-binders that are FDA-approved for hyperkalemia, versus usual care (no alert, current standard of care). One hundred and fifty outpatient Cardiology and Internal Medicine providers (to include physicians and advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and advanced practice registered nurses)) practicing at affiliated locations will be enrolled and undergo randomization to either the intervention (alert) group or a control (usual care) group. Those in the intervention group will receive an informational alert for their eligible adult outpatients (those with HFrEF not currently prescribed an MRA). Those in the control group will not receive any alerts and will continue to care for patients as usual. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with HFrEF who have an active prescription for an MRA at 6 months following randomization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Cardiology/Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinics of Yale New Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults equal to or greater than 18 years of age
  • Outpatients of providers randomized into the study within Internal Medicine and Cardiology outpatient clinics
  • Diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF less than or equal to 40% on the most recent TTE)
  • Registration in the Yale Heart Failure Registry (NCT04237701)
  • Not currently prescribed an MRA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute contraindication to MRAs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention - Best Practice Alert
Providers randomized to the intervention arm will have a best practice alert appear for each of their eligible patients upon opening of the order entry screen in the patient's medical record which alerts to the presence of HFrEF and the fact that the patient is not currently prescribed an MRA. A link to an order set for MRAs (or to potassium binders should a patient be hyperkalemic) will provided, along with a link to current best practices surrounding the use of MRAs.
Providers randomized to the intervention arm will have a best practice alert appear for each of their eligible patients upon opening of the order entry screen in the patient's medical record. This alert informs the provider to the presence of HFrEF and absence of MRA prescription, notes the patient's current LVEF, and notes the most recent labs, including NT-ProBNP, potassium, and creatinine. Providers will also have access to a link to best available guideline recommended information regarding use of MRAs and a link to both an order set for prescribing an MRA and an alternate order set with option for potassium monitoring should hyperkalemia be a concern. If a patient is hyperkalemic (i.e. K ≥ 5 mEq/L), a link to an order set for prescribing a potassium binder will be provided instead. If a provider feels that the recommended therapy is not indicated for a particular patient, he/she can select an available reason from the list provided within the alert.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Providers will not receive a best practice alert for eligible patients and will continue to care for patients as usual.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with an active prescription for an MRA
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post-randomization
Proportion of patients with an active prescription for an MRA, defined as a prescription present in the electronic health record for any drug in the MRA class that is active (not expired) and has remaining doses left at 6 months after the date of randomization.
Measured at 6 months post-randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of MRA prescriptions
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Number of any MRA prescription during study period.
Within one year post randomization
Percentage of MRA prescriptions filled
Time Frame: Within 30 days of written prescription
Percentage of prescriptions filled of initial MRA prescriptions written during the study period.
Within 30 days of written prescription
Time to first MRA prescription
Time Frame: From enrollment to time of MRA prescription
Time (in days) to first MRA prescription
From enrollment to time of MRA prescription
Percentage of patients with Hyperkalemia (K>5.0)
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients experiencing hyperkalemia (K greater than or equal to 5.0 mEq/L)
Within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients with Hyperkalemia (K>5.5)
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients experiencing hyperkalemia (K greater than or equal to 5.5 mEq/L)
Within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients with Hyperkalemia (K>5.0) with MRA
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients experiencing hyperkalemia (K greater than or equal to 5.0 mEq/L) with an active MRA prescription
Within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients with Hyperkalemia (K>5.5) with MRA
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients experiencing hyperkalemia (K greater than or equal to 5.5 mEq/L) with an active MRA prescription
Within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 1 month post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders
Measured at 1 month post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 2 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders
Measured at 2 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders
Measured at 3 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 4 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders
Measured at 4 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 5 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders
Measured at 5 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders
Measured at 6 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder + MRA prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 1 month post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders and MRA
Measured at 1 month post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder + MRA prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 2 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders and MRA
Measured at 2 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder + MRA prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders and MRA
Measured at 3 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder + MRA prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 4 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders and MRA
Measured at 4 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder + MRA prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 5 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders and MRA
Measured at 5 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with potassium binder + MRA prescription
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders and MRA
Measured at 6 months post randomization
Type of potassium binder prescribed
Time Frame: First potassium binder prescribed at any point between enrollment and study completion
Type of first potassium binder prescribed
First potassium binder prescribed at any point between enrollment and study completion
Rationale for provider not prescribing an MRA if indicated (intervention group only)
Time Frame: Any rationale provided within one year post randomization
Provider-documented (via the best practice alert) rationale for not prescribing indicated MRA (intervention group only)
Any rationale provided within one year post randomization
Rationale for provider not prescribing a potassium binder if indicated (intervention group only)
Time Frame: Any rationale provided within one year post randomization
Provider-documented (via the best practice alert) rationale for not prescribing indicated potassium binder (intervention group only)
Any rationale provided within one year post randomization
Percentage of patients with ED visits
Time Frame: Measured at 1 month post randomization
Percentage of patients with any ED visit
Measured at 1 month post randomization
Percentage of patients with ED visits
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with any ED visit
Measured at 3 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with ED visits
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with any ED visit
Measured at 6 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with ED visits
Time Frame: Measured at 12 months post randomization
Percentage of patients with any ED visit
Measured at 12 months post randomization
ED visit count
Time Frame: Measured at 1 month post randomization
Count of ED visits per patient
Measured at 1 month post randomization
ED visit count
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Count of ED visits per patient
Measured at 3 months post randomization
ED visit count
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Count of ED visits per patient
Measured at 6 months post randomization
ED visit count
Time Frame: Measured at 12 months post randomization
Count of ED visits per patient
Measured at 12 months post randomization
Rates of Heart failure-related hospital admissions
Time Frame: Measured at 1 month post randomization
Rates of HF-related hospital admissions (uses computations phenotype)
Measured at 1 month post randomization
Rates of Heart failure-related hospital admissions
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Rates of HF-related hospital admissions (uses computations phenotype)
Measured at 3 months post randomization
Rates of Heart failure-related hospital admissions
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Rates of HF-related hospital admissions (uses computations phenotype)
Measured at 6 months post randomization
Rates of Heart failure-related hospital admissions
Time Frame: Measured at 12 months post randomization
Rates of HF-related hospital admissions (uses computations phenotype)
Measured at 12 months post randomization
Rates Outpatient visits
Time Frame: Measured at 1 monnh post randomization
Rates of outpatient visits
Measured at 1 monnh post randomization
Rate of Outpatient visits
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Rates of outpatient visits
Measured at 3 months post randomization
Rate of Outpatient visits
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Rates of outpatient visits
Measured at 6 months post randomization
Rate of Outpatient visits
Time Frame: Measured at 12 months post randomization
Rates of outpatient visits
Measured at 12 months post randomization
Rate of ED visit + IV diuretics
Time Frame: Measured at 1 month post randomization
Rates of total ED visits in which a dose of IV diuretics was given
Measured at 1 month post randomization
Rate of ED visit + IV diuretics
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Rates of total ED visits in which a dose of IV diuretics was given
Measured at 3 months post randomization
Rate of ED visit + IV diuretics
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Rates of total ED visits in which a dose of IV diuretics was given
Measured at 6 months post randomization
Rate of ED visit + IV diuretics
Time Frame: Measured at 12 months post randomization
Rates of total ED visits in which a dose of IV diuretics was given
Measured at 12 months post randomization
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Measured at 1 month post randomization
Rates of all-cause mortality
Measured at 1 month post randomization
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Rates of all-cause mortality
Measured at 3 months post randomization
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Rates of all-cause mortality
Measured at 6 months post randomization
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Measured at 12 months post randomization
Rates of all-cause mortality
Measured at 12 months post randomization
Total healthcare associated costs
Time Frame: Measured at 1 month post randomization
Total healthcare-associated cost per patient
Measured at 1 month post randomization
Total healthcare associated costs
Time Frame: Measured at 3 months post randomization
Total healthcare-associated cost per patient
Measured at 3 months post randomization
Total healthcare associated costs
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months post randomization
Total healthcare-associated cost per patient
Measured at 6 months post randomization
Total healthcare associated costs
Time Frame: Measured at 12 months post randomization
Total healthcare-associated cost per patient
Measured at 12 months post randomization
Rates of documented hyperkalemia at an ED visit
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Documented hyperkalemia (K ≥ 5.5 mEq/L) at an ED visit
Within one year post randomization
Rates of documented hyperkalemia at an outpatient visit
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Documented hyperkalemia (K ≥ 5.5 mEq/L) at an outpatient visit
Within one year post randomization
Rates of documented hyperkalemia during a hospital HF admission
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Documented hyperkalemia (K ≥ 5.5 mEq/L) at an HF-related hospital admission
Within one year post randomization
Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring
Within one year post randomization
Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring +/- MRA
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring for those with an active prescription of MRA vs. not
Within one year post randomization
Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring +/- potassium binder
Time Frame: Within one year post randomization
Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring for those with an active prescription of potassium binder vs. not
Within one year post randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subgroup Analysis: Hyperkalemia at randomization
Time Frame: At randomization
Hyperkalemia at randomization at both thresholds of ≥ 5.0 mEq/L and K ≥ 5.5 mEq/L
At randomization
Subgroup Analysis: Prior hyperkalemia (IDC-10 Code)
Time Frame: From one year prior to randomization up to randomization
Prior documentation of hyperkalemia by ICD-10 Code during the past 1 year
From one year prior to randomization up to randomization
Subgroup Analysis: Prior hyperkalemia (K history)
Time Frame: From one year prior to randomization up to randomization
Prior documentation of hyperkalemia by history of K 5.0 mEq/L during the past 1 year
From one year prior to randomization up to randomization
Subgroup Analysis: Patient demographics
Time Frame: At randomization
The following demographics subgroups will be captured: Age <65 years of age, sex, race
At randomization
Subgroup Analysis: Chronic Kidney Disease
Time Frame: At randomization
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage ≥ stage III, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60
At randomization
Subgroup Analysis: Insurance status
Time Frame: At randomization
Insurance status (commercial, public (Medicare, Medicaid), other, none)
At randomization
Subgroup Analysis: GDMT medications
Time Frame: At randomization
Number of concomitant active prescriptions for GDMT medications (beta blocker, ACEi/ARB/ARNI, SGLT2-inhibitor)
At randomization
Subgroup Analysis: Provider type
Time Frame: At randomization
The following provider characteristics will be captured: title (advanced practitioner, resident physician, fellow physician, attending physician), history of or current Cardiology fellowship training, years of training post-graduate medical school
At randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francis P Wilson, MD MSCE, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000030513

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified data underlying results for publication will be shared upon publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon publication; indefinitely.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Clinical Trials on Best Practice Alert

Subscribe