tDCS and the Gaze Cueing Effect

Influence of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Applied to the Right Orbitofrontal Cortex on Gaze and Arrow Cueing Effects

This study employs transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to investigate the role of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in processing gaze and arrow cues.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study employs transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to investigate the role of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in processing gaze and arrow cues.To examine the distinct functions of the OFC in processing social versus non-social stimuli, participants were randomly assigned to one of three tDCS groups: anodal, cathodal, or sham. Following stimulation, all participants completed a spatial cueing task involving both gaze and arrow cues. Two stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) conditions (200 ms and 600 ms) were implemented to investigate how timing modulates the processing of these cues within the rOFC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 611731
        • School of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy subjects without past or current psychiatric or neurological disorders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of head injury
  • no implants in the head
  • medical or psychiatric illness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: anodal tDCS
anodal tDCS rOFC
use eye gaze images as cues
use arrow images as cues
The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and the target was 200 ms.
The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and the target was 600 ms.
The cue is spatially congruent with the target.
The cue is spatially incongruent with the target.
Experimental: cathodal tDCS
cathodal tDCS rOFC
use eye gaze images as cues
use arrow images as cues
The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and the target was 200 ms.
The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and the target was 600 ms.
The cue is spatially congruent with the target.
The cue is spatially incongruent with the target.
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
sham tDCS rOFC
use eye gaze images as cues
use arrow images as cues
The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and the target was 200 ms.
The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and the target was 600 ms.
The cue is spatially congruent with the target.
The cue is spatially incongruent with the target.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reaction time to the judgment of the target location.
Time Frame: 1 hour
The primary analysis focused on the reaction times for judging the target location under each condition.
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Magnitude of the cueing effect
Time Frame: 1 hour
This index is derived by subtracting the congruent reaction time from the incongruent reaction time to quantify the magnitude of the cueing effect.
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on tDCS

Clinical Trials on Gaze cues

Subscribe