Abemaciclib Dose Escalation in Early High-Risk Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy (ADES)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Zhaoqing Fan, MD, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Abemaciclib Dose Escalation Strategy in Adjuvant Therapy for Early High-Risk Breast Cancer

Abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy has become one of the important adjuvant treatment regimens for patients with HR+/HER2- high-risk early breast cancer. However, adverse events such as diarrhea, fatigue, neutropenia and elevated liver enzymes are concentrated in the early stage of adjuvant therapy, which often lead to dose reduction, temporary drug interruption or even permanent discontinuation. This further affects treatment adherence, relative dose intensity (RDI) and treatment completion rate.

Findings from the TRADE study suggest that a step-up dosing strategy, initiating at a lower dose followed by gradual titration to the standard dose, combined with standardized patient education and symptomatic management, may improve early treatment tolerance, reduce the burden of partial toxicities, and increase the likelihood of patients achieving and maintaining abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily. Based on the above evidence and clinical experience, step-up dosing has been adopted by some clinicians for real-world clinical practice.

Nevertheless, existing evidence is mainly derived from non-Chinese populations. There is still a lack of systematic real-world data on step-up dosing among Chinese breast cancer patients under routine outpatient management, including the early toxicity profile, dose escalation achievement rate at each stage, dose adjustment pathways (prolonged escalation, treatment pause or dose de-escalation), RDI distribution, correlation with quality of life, and baseline factors affecting treatment tolerance and dose target attainment. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a real-world study focused on Chinese patients to fill the gap in local clinical evidence, and provide a basis for clinical pathway formulation, patient education, and subsequent multicenter validation studies.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

86

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Lize Wang, Doctor
  • Phone Number: +86-010-88197830
  • Email: lize2010@163.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥18 years;
  • Pathologically confirmed breast cancer with ER and/or PR positive, HER2 negative;
  • Completed radical mastectomy/radiacal breast surgery;
  • Plan to receive abemaciclib combined endocrine therapy for at least 12 weeks, with abemaciclib administered via a step-up dosing regimen;
  • ECOG performance status 0-1;
  • Adequate organ function meeting medication requirements (routine blood test, liver and renal function, and other indicators consistent with clinical medication safety criteria);
  • Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous exposure to any CDK4/6 inhibitor;
  • Active infection or severe infection requiring systemic anti-infective treatment;
  • Significant gastrointestinal diseases such as chronic diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease, short bowel syndrome, which may affect drug absorption or increase the risk of diarrhea;
  • Significant baseline hepatic or renal dysfunction, or uncontrolled severe comorbidities judged by the investigator to affect safety or treatment adherence;
  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Any other condition deemed ineligible for enrollment by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose escalation group
Patients receiving postoperative abemaciclib step-up dosing regimen. Dose escalation schedule: 100 mg BID (Weeks 1-4), 100/150 mg daily (Weeks 5-8), 150 mg BID (Weeks 9-12).
Patients receiving postoperative abemaciclib step-up dosing regimen. Dose escalation schedule: 100 mg BID (Weeks 1-4), 100/150 mg daily (Weeks 5-8), 150 mg BID (Weeks 9-12).
Patients receiving postoperative abemaciclib step-up dosing regimen. Dose escalation schedule: 100 mg BID (Weeks 1-4), 100/150 mg daily (Weeks 5-8), 150 mg BID (Weeks 9-12).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of inadequate dosing
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Proportion of patients with inadequate dosing from postoperative treatment initiation to week 12
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose Target Attainment and Treatment Intensity
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks"
Proportion of patients achieving 150 mg BID at Week 12.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks"
QoL deterioration rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
Proportion of patients experiencing a deterioration in health-related quality of life defined as a decrease of ≥10 points from baseline through EORTC QLQ-C30.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Considering the protection of patient privacy, relevant clinical data will not be released publicly.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Dose escalation

Subscribe