- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07602556
Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Whole Blood for Epidural Patch in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
May 22, 2026 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Whole Blood for Epidural Patch in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a condition characterized by refractory orthostatic headache, mostly due to leaks of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
Epidural patch with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which contains numerous growth factors and cytokines, has been reported as a new and promising alternative for current standard whole blood patching.
However, there is no study comparing the efficacy and safety of the two approaches.
In this study, we aimed to provide data concerning the outcomes of PRP patching versus conventional whole blood patching for treatment of refractory SIH cases failing in conservative therapy.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
218
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed consent to participate the research obtained from the patient
- Satisfies the criteria for SIH according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders.
Exclusion Criteria:
- There was concern for other causes of intracranial hypotension, such as postdural puncture, postsurgical and post-traumatic CSF leaks
- Prior treatment with EBP at any time previously
- Any contraindication to epidural puncture, such as space-occupying intracranial or intraspinal lesions, spinal defect, suspected infection over the puncture site, bleeding disorder and current anticoagulation therapy
- History of drug and alcohol abuse, cognitive dysfunction, or mental illness
- Unable to cooperate with postoperative evaluation, treatment, rehabilitation, and follow-up visits
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PRP Patch (PP)
|
Autologous PRP was prepared with the 2-stage centrifugation method and mixed with iohexol contrast.
We chose two separate sites for epidural access.
A standard epidural puncture was conducted under the guidance of CT.
The PRP mixture was titrated slowly into the epidural space and must be stopped immediately to patient's perception of backache or irradiating pain.
A strict bed stay for 48 h was prescribed in supine position postoperatively.
|
|
Active Comparator: Whole blood patch (WP)
|
Autologous whole blood was prepared and mixed with iohexol contrast.
We chose two separate sites for epidural access.
A standard epidural puncture was conducted under the guidance of CT.
The whole blood mixture was titrated slowly into the epidural space and must be stopped immediately to patient's perception of backache or irradiating pain.
A strict bed stay for 48 h was prescribed in supine position postoperatively.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The complete relief rate of patients with SIH
Time Frame: At 3 months after first epidural patch
|
The complete relief was defined as the pain intensity of 0-1/10 on NRS or/and minimal symptoms post-procedurally.
|
At 3 months after first epidural patch
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity of orthostatic headache
Time Frame: At 48 hours, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
|
Pain intensity was evaluated by pain numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain).
|
At 48 hours, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
|
|
The complete relief rate of patients with SIH
Time Frame: At 48 hours, 2 weeks and 6 months after first epidural patch
|
The complete relief was defined as the pain intensity of 0-1/10 on NRS or/and minimal symptoms post-procedurally.
|
At 48 hours, 2 weeks and 6 months after first epidural patch
|
|
The good response rate of patients with SIH.
Time Frame: At 48 hours, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
|
Good response was defined as a headache reduction of at least 50%, with improvement of orthostatic component post-procedurally.
|
At 48 hours, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
|
|
The failure rate in each group.
Time Frame: At 6 months after first epidural patch
|
Failure was defined as a persistent or worsening symptom with less than 50% of headache reduction within 72 hour post-procedurally.
|
At 6 months after first epidural patch
|
|
The recurrence rate in each group.
Time Frame: At 6 months after first epidural patch
|
Recurrence was defined as fresh onset of orthostatic headache in completely relieved patients beyond the 72-hour mark.
|
At 6 months after first epidural patch
|
|
Patients'quality of life
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
|
Patients'quality of life was evaluated by Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), with six item scores of headache-related disability divided into 36-49 (little or no impact), 50-55 (some impact), 56-59 (substantial impact), and ≥60 (severe impact).
|
At 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
|
|
Patients' overall satisfaction
Time Frame: At 6 months after first epidural patch
|
Patients' overall satisfaction was graded into very unsatisfactory (1), unsatisfactory (2), neutral (3), satisfactory (4) and very satisfactory (5), according to the Likert scale.
|
At 6 months after first epidural patch
|
|
The occurrence of complications in each group.
Time Frame: During and after first epidural patch until the end of 6-month follow up.
|
During and after first epidural patch until the end of 6-month follow up.
|
|
|
The percent of patients requiring repeat epidural patch in each group
Time Frame: Within 6- month follow up
|
Within 6- month follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2029
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 16, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
May 22, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 27, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 22, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ky2023-263-03-09
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalWithdrawnSpontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
-
Duke UniversitySiemens HealthineersNot yet recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingSpontaneous Intracranial HypotensionUnited States
-
University Health Network, TorontoRecruitingSpontaneous Intracranial HypotensionCanada
-
Yonsei UniversityNot yet recruitingSpontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedSpontaneous Intracranial HypotensionFrance
-
Danish Headache CenterEnrolling by invitationIntracranial Hypotension | Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension | Post-Lumbar Puncture HeadacheDenmark
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterSuspendedHyperprolactinemia | Spontaneous Intracranial HypotensionUnited States
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingVenous Sinus Stenosis | Idiopathic Intracranial HypotensionChina
-
Tang-Du HospitalRecruitingSpontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage | Spontaneous Intraparenchymal Cerebral Hemorrhage | Spontaneous Cerebellar HaemorrhageChina
Clinical Trials on PRP Patch group
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalWithdrawnSpontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
-
Philips Electronics Nederland BVCompletedLow Back Pain | Musculoskeletal Pain | Chronic Pain | Low Back Pain, RecurrentGermany
-
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.CompletedKnee OsteoarthritisTaiwan
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTerminatedArthroscopic Surgery | Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex InjuryUnited States
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaEnrolling by invitation
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingReproductive IssuesChina
-
Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityEnrolling by invitationAsherman Syndrome | Intrauterine AdhesionChina
-
Beni-Suef UniversityRecruitingBenign Vocal Fold LesionsEgypt
-
Konya Meram State HospitalCompleted
-
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonHospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. GonzalezRecruitingPersistent Epithelial DefectMexico