Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Whole Blood for Epidural Patch in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

May 22, 2026 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Whole Blood for Epidural Patch in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a condition characterized by refractory orthostatic headache, mostly due to leaks of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Epidural patch with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which contains numerous growth factors and cytokines, has been reported as a new and promising alternative for current standard whole blood patching. However, there is no study comparing the efficacy and safety of the two approaches. In this study, we aimed to provide data concerning the outcomes of PRP patching versus conventional whole blood patching for treatment of refractory SIH cases failing in conservative therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

218

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent to participate the research obtained from the patient
  • Satisfies the criteria for SIH according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There was concern for other causes of intracranial hypotension, such as postdural puncture, postsurgical and post-traumatic CSF leaks
  • Prior treatment with EBP at any time previously
  • Any contraindication to epidural puncture, such as space-occupying intracranial or intraspinal lesions, spinal defect, suspected infection over the puncture site, bleeding disorder and current anticoagulation therapy
  • History of drug and alcohol abuse, cognitive dysfunction, or mental illness
  • Unable to cooperate with postoperative evaluation, treatment, rehabilitation, and follow-up visits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRP Patch (PP)
Autologous PRP was prepared with the 2-stage centrifugation method and mixed with iohexol contrast. We chose two separate sites for epidural access. A standard epidural puncture was conducted under the guidance of CT. The PRP mixture was titrated slowly into the epidural space and must be stopped immediately to patient's perception of backache or irradiating pain. A strict bed stay for 48 h was prescribed in supine position postoperatively.
Active Comparator: Whole blood patch (WP)
Autologous whole blood was prepared and mixed with iohexol contrast. We chose two separate sites for epidural access. A standard epidural puncture was conducted under the guidance of CT. The whole blood mixture was titrated slowly into the epidural space and must be stopped immediately to patient's perception of backache or irradiating pain. A strict bed stay for 48 h was prescribed in supine position postoperatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The complete relief rate of patients with SIH
Time Frame: At 3 months after first epidural patch
The complete relief was defined as the pain intensity of 0-1/10 on NRS or/and minimal symptoms post-procedurally.
At 3 months after first epidural patch

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity of orthostatic headache
Time Frame: At 48 hours, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
Pain intensity was evaluated by pain numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain).
At 48 hours, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
The complete relief rate of patients with SIH
Time Frame: At 48 hours, 2 weeks and 6 months after first epidural patch
The complete relief was defined as the pain intensity of 0-1/10 on NRS or/and minimal symptoms post-procedurally.
At 48 hours, 2 weeks and 6 months after first epidural patch
The good response rate of patients with SIH.
Time Frame: At 48 hours, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
Good response was defined as a headache reduction of at least 50%, with improvement of orthostatic component post-procedurally.
At 48 hours, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
The failure rate in each group.
Time Frame: At 6 months after first epidural patch
Failure was defined as a persistent or worsening symptom with less than 50% of headache reduction within 72 hour post-procedurally.
At 6 months after first epidural patch
The recurrence rate in each group.
Time Frame: At 6 months after first epidural patch
Recurrence was defined as fresh onset of orthostatic headache in completely relieved patients beyond the 72-hour mark.
At 6 months after first epidural patch
Patients'quality of life
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
Patients'quality of life was evaluated by Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), with six item scores of headache-related disability divided into 36-49 (little or no impact), 50-55 (some impact), 56-59 (substantial impact), and ≥60 (severe impact).
At 3 and 6 months after first epidural patch
Patients' overall satisfaction
Time Frame: At 6 months after first epidural patch
Patients' overall satisfaction was graded into very unsatisfactory (1), unsatisfactory (2), neutral (3), satisfactory (4) and very satisfactory (5), according to the Likert scale.
At 6 months after first epidural patch
The occurrence of complications in each group.
Time Frame: During and after first epidural patch until the end of 6-month follow up.
During and after first epidural patch until the end of 6-month follow up.
The percent of patients requiring repeat epidural patch in each group
Time Frame: Within 6- month follow up
Within 6- month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ky2023-263-03-09

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

Clinical Trials on PRP Patch group

Subscribe