Comparing Efficacy of PRP Combined With Different Hyaluronan for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

June 16, 2021 updated by: Shu-Fen Sun, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

Comparing Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Combined With Different Hyaluronan for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Control Trial

Either PRP or HA is each effective for treating knee OA. However, the efficacy of combined PRP and HA injections remains unknown clinically.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intraarticular plasma-rich platelet (PRP) or hyaluronic acid (HA) was each effective for knee osteoarthritis(OA). The efficacy of combined injections remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PRP combined with different hyaluronan for treating knee OA. In a prospective, randomized-controlled trial, 95 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 knee OA were randomized to receive a single intraarticular Artz (10mg/ml) followed by PRP (N=48) into target knee or single HYAJOINT Plus (20mg/ml) injection followed by PRP (N=47). Primary outcome was the change from baseline in the visual analog scale (VAS) pain at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne index, single leg stance test (SLS), use of rescue analgesics and patient satisfaction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 813
        • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age of 20-85 years Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis for more than 6 months despite analgesics, NSAIDs, or physical therapy Kellgren-Lawrence grade-2 knee osteoarthritis seen on radiographs made within previous 6 months Radiological evidence of bilateral knee OA was accepted if global pain VAS in the contralateral knee was less than 30 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous orthopedic surgery on spine or lower limb Disabling osteoarthritis of either hip or foot Knee instability, apparent joint effusion, or marked valgus/varus deformity Known allergy to avian proteins or hyaluronan products Confirmed or suspected pregnancy, or lactating Intra-articular injections into knee in previous 6 months Any specific medical conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, active infection, hemiparesis, neoplasm, hematological etc.) that would interfere with assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: the PRP+Artz group
The patients in the PRP+Artz group received one intraarticular Artz injection (2.5 ml) followed consecutively by one intraarticular injection of PRP (3ml).
The patients in the PRP+Artz group received one intraarticular Artz injection (2.5 ml) followed consecutively by one intraarticular injection of PRP (3ml).
The patients in the PRP+HYAJOINT Plus group received one intraarticular HYAJOINT Plus injection (3ml) followed by one intraarticular injection of PRP (3ml).
Experimental: the PRP+HYAJOINT Plus group
The patients in the PRP+HYAJOINT Plus group received one intraarticular HYAJOINT Plus injection (3ml) followed by one intraarticular injection of PRP (3ml).
The patients in the PRP+Artz group received one intraarticular Artz injection (2.5 ml) followed consecutively by one intraarticular injection of PRP (3ml).
The patients in the PRP+HYAJOINT Plus group received one intraarticular HYAJOINT Plus injection (3ml) followed by one intraarticular injection of PRP (3ml).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual analog scale (VAS) pain change
Time Frame: Month 6
the change from baseline in the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 6 months. The patient rated the average severity of knee pain on knee movement over the previous week on a 0-100 mm VAS (0 = no pain to 100 = worst possible pain)
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC, Likert Scale), t
Time Frame: Month 6
(WOMAC, Likert Scale) is a 24-item questionnaire with 3 subscales measuring pain, stiffness, and physical function. Total score is 96 and higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Month 6
the Lequesne index
Time Frame: Month 6
Lequesne index was used to assess severity of knee symptoms during the last week. It includes the measurement of pain, walking distance, and activities of daily living. Maximal score is 24 and higher scores represent worse function.
Month 6
single-leg stance test (SLS)
Time Frame: Month 6
Single-leg stance test (SLS) is done by raising one foot up without touching it to the supported lower extremity with target knee and maintain balance for as long as possible. Each participant performed 3 trials, and the best result of the 3 trials was recorded.
Month 6
patient satisfaction.
Time Frame: Month 6
Patients were asked to rate their treatment satisfaction compared to the preinjection condition, using a 100 mm VAS (0= completely dissatisfied, 100=completely satisfied).
Month 6
consumption of analgesics
Time Frame: Month 6
Acetaminophen (500mg; maximum daily dose, 4 g) was the only rescue medication allowed for knee pain during the study period, Use of rescue medication during the study period was recorded in a patient diary.
Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shu-Fen Sun, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on PRP+Artz group

Subscribe