Active Post-Market Surveillance of Innovative Devices for Valvular Heart Disease

May 18, 2026 updated by: Beijing Anzhen Hospital

An Active Post-Market Surveillance Study Assessing the Real-World Clinical Applicability, Long-Term Safety, and Effectiveness of Innovative Medical Devices for Valvular Heart Disease

This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study aims to establish a post-market registry framework to evaluate the real-world clinical applicability, long-term safety, and effectiveness of innovative heart valve devices in China.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective, multicenter, observational registry study plans to consecutively enroll patients across 50 Chinese hospitals undergoing treatment with innovative heart valve devices-including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER), and transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TTVA) systems. By collecting comprehensive data on medical history, physical examinations, laboratory tests, echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), electrocardiogram (ECG), wearable synchronous electrocardiogram-phonocardiogram, procedural details, pharmacotherapy, as well as regular clinical and imaging follow-up, this study aims to establish a post-market registry framework to evaluate the real-world clinical applicability, long-term safety, and effectiveness of innovative heart valve devices.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

5500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100029

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with valvular heart disease who have undergone treatment with innovative heart valve replacement or repair systems, including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER), and transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TTVA), at 50 medical centers in China.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) receiving treatment with prosthetic aortic valve replacement systems (transcatheter and surgical valves), transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) systems, or transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty systems
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients who voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent form
  • Willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair
Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair
Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty
Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty
Device: Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
Rate of neurologic events
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure

Neurologic events are defined according to VARC-3 criteria, including ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, and Transient ischaemic attack (TIA):

Ischaemic Stroke: Acute focal neurologic deficit in a vascular territory with symptoms ≥ 24h OR < 24h with neuroimaging (CT or MRI) or pathology confirmation of CNS infarction.

Haemorrhagic Stroke: Acute neurologic deficit due to non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, confirmed by neuroimaging (CT or MRI) or pathology.

TIA: Transient focal neurologic deficit < 24h presumed to be ischaemic, but without evidence of acute infarction on neuroimaging (CT or MRI) or pathology.

Up to 1 year post-procedure
Hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
Bleeding and transfusions
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure

Bleeding events are defined according to VARC-3 criteria:

Type 1 (Minor): Overt bleeding that does not require intervention but leads to hospitalization, increased level of care, or medical evaluation, or requires a transfusion of 1 unit of whole blood or red blood cells.

Type 2 (Major): Overt bleeding that requires a transfusion of 2 to 4 units of whole blood or red blood cells, or is associated with a hemoglobin drop of 3 to 5 g/dL.

Type 3 (Life-threatening or Disabling): Overt bleeding in a critical organ (e.g., intracranial, pericardial with tamponade), causing hypovolemic shock or severe hypotension requiring vasopressors or surgery, or requiring a transfusion of ≥ 5 units of whole blood or red blood cells, or associated with a hemoglobin drop ≥ 5 g/dL.

Type 4 (Fatal): Overt bleeding leading to death, classified as probable based on clinical suspicion or definite if confirmed by autopsy or neuroimaging.

Up to 1 year post-procedure
Vascular and access-related complications
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
Cardiac structural complications
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
Clinically significant valve thrombosis
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
Technical success
Time Frame: Periprocedural

Technical success is defined according to VARC-3 criteria, requiring the fulfillment of the following:

  1. Freedom from mortality.
  2. Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system.
  3. Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location.
  4. Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device, or to a major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication.
Periprocedural
Device success
Time Frame: at 30 days

Device success is defined according to VARC-3 criteria, requiring the fulfillment of the following:

  1. Technical success
  2. Freedom from mortality
  3. Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication
  4. Intended performance of the valve
at 30 days
Early safety
Time Frame: at 30 days

Taking the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement cohort as an example, early safety is defined according to VARC-3 criteria, requiring the fulfillment of the following:

  1. Freedom from all-cause mortality
  2. Freedom from all stroke
  3. Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding
  4. Freedom from major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication
  5. Freedom from acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4
  6. Freedom from moderate or severe aortic regurgitation
  7. Freedom from new permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities
  8. Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device
at 30 days
Clinical efficacy
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure

Taking the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement cohort as an example, clinical efficacy is defined according to VARC-3 criteria, requiring the fulfillment of the following:

  1. Freedom from all-cause mortality
  2. Freedom from all stroke
  3. Freedom from hospitalization for procedure- or valve-related causes
  4. Freedom from KCCQ Overall Summary Score <45 or decline from baseline of >10 point
Up to 1 year post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Other procedural or valve-related complications
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
New conduction disturbances and arrhythmias
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
Leaflet thickening and reduced motion
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Score
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Class I, II, III, or IV
Up to 1 year post-procedure
EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure
Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Up to 1 year post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Subscribe