CONFIDENCE Registry to Assess Safety and Performance of Portico System to Treat Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

October 18, 2024 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

CONtrolled Delivery For ImproveD outcomEs With cliNiCal Evidence

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to characterize the procedural safety and device performance of transfemoral implantation of the Portico™ Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve in patients with symptomatic degenerative aortic stenosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The CONFIDENCE registry study will be conducting as a prospective, non-randomized, observational, single-arm, multi-center study.

Approximately 1000 subjects with severe symptomatic (NYHA class ≥ II) aortic stenosis (AS), will undergo Portico™ Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve implantation.

The subject data will be collected at baseline, index procedure, pre- discharge, 30 days and 12 months from the index procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1001

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102
        • Heart Care Partners- Wesley Hospital
      • Antwerpen, Belgium, 2020
        • Az Middelheim
      • Olomouc, Czechia, 77900
        • University Hospital Olomouc
      • Bad Nauheim, Germany, 61231
        • Kerckhoff-Klinik gGmbH
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Charité Campus Mitte (CCM)
      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF)
      • Berlin-Mitte, Germany, 13353
        • Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum
      • Dortmund, Germany, 44137
        • St.-Johannes-Hospital
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH Universitätsklinik
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • UKE Hamburg (Universitatsklinik Eppendorf)
      • Karlsruhe, Germany, 76133
        • Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH Medizinischen Klinik IV
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
    • Bavaria
      • Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany, 91054
        • Kliniken der Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat
      • Milano, Italy, 20132
        • Ospedale San Raffaele
      • San Donato Milanese, Italy, 20097
        • Policlinico San Donato
      • Vicenza, Italy, 36100
        • Ospedale San Bortolo
    • Lombardy
      • Monza, Lombardy, Italy, 20900
        • Policlinico di Monza
    • Mazovia
      • Warsaw, Mazovia, Poland, 02-097
        • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny
      • Huelva, Spain, 21005
        • Hospital General Juan Ramon Jimenez
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Madrid, Spain, 28222
        • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
    • Catalonia
      • Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08025
        • Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
      • Aarau, Switzerland, 5001
        • Kantonsspital Aarau
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
        • King's College Hospital
    • Ireland
      • Belfast, Ireland, United Kingdom, BT12 6BA
        • Royal Victoria Hospital
    • North East England
      • Middlesbrough, North East England, United Kingdom, TS4 3BW
        • James Cook University Hoospital
    • Swansea
      • Morriston, Swansea, United Kingdom, SA6 6NL
        • Morriston Hospital - ABM University Health Board

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who are ≥18 years of age or legal age in host country and have been identified as a candidate for a Portico™ valve implant
  2. Subjects who have been informed of the nature of the study, agree to its provisions and have provided written informed consent as approved by the Ethics Committee (EC) of the respective clinical center

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have sepsis, including active endocarditis
  2. Have any evidence of left ventricular or atrial thrombus
  3. Have vascular conditions (i.e. caliber, stenosis, tortuosity, or severe calcification) that make insertion and endovascular access to the aortic valve improbable
  4. Have a non-calcified aortic annulus
  5. Have congenital bicuspid or unicuspid leaflet configuration
  6. Are unable to tolerate antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy
  7. Are pregnant at the time of signing informed consent
  8. Are currently participating in a drug or device study that may impact the registry (unless prior sponsor approval for co-enrollment is granted)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Portico™ Valve, Delivery System(s) and Loading System(s)
Subjects undergoing implantation of a commercially available Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve using the Portico TAVI system will be included.
Subjects will undergo implantation of a commercially available Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve using the Portico TAVI system.
Experimental: Portico™ Valve, FlexNav Delivery and Loading System(s)
Subjects undergoing implantation of a commercially available Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve using the FlexNav Delivery and Loading Systems will be included.
Subjects will undergo implantation of a commercially available Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve using the FlexNav Delivery and Loading Systems.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
Death due to proximate cardiac cause, non-coronary vascular conditions, procedure-related deaths, valve-related deaths, sudden or unwitnessed death and unknown cause.
30 days from the index procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number of Subjects With Stroke
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number of Subjects With Bleeding Events
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number of Subjects With Acute Kidney Injury
Time Frame: At 30 days

The increase in creatinine must occur within 48 hours.

Stage 1: Increase in serum creatinine to 150% to 199% (1.5 to 1.99 X increase compared with baseline) or increase of greater than or equal to 0.3 mg/dL (26.4 mmol/L) or Urine output <0.5 mL/kg per hour for >6 but <12 hours.

Stage 2: Increase in serum creatinine to 200% to 299% (2.0 to 2.99 X increase compared with baseline) or Urine output <0.5 mL/kg per hour for >12 but <24 hours.

Stage 3: Increase in serum creatinine to greater than or equal to 300% (3 X increase compared with baseline) or serum creatinine of ≥ 4.0 mg/dL (354 mmol/L) with an acute increase of at least 0.5 mg/dL (44 mmol/L)or Urine output <0.3 mL/kg per hour for ≥24 hours or anuria for ≥12 hours. Patients receiving renal replacement therapy are considered to meet Stage 3 criteria irrespective of other criteria.

At 30 days
Number of Subjects With Vascular Complications
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number of Subjects With Annular Rupture
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number of Subjects With Coronary Obstruction
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number of Subjects Undergoing Conversion To Open Surgery
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number Of Subjects Undergoing Transcatheter Valve-In-Valve Deployment
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number Of Subjects With Valve Embolization
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Number Of Subjects Undergoing Naïve Permanent Pacemaker Insertion
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Vessel Diameter
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Introducer Sheath Used
Time Frame: At 30 days
This is a yes or no question on the CRF. Sites report if the implanter used an introducer sheath (a special device used to facilitate introduction of the investigational device into the subjects vasculature).
At 30 days
Implant Success
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
Effective Orifice Area
Time Frame: At 30 days
Effective orifice area is a measure of the working area of the implanted valve determined by echocardiograph.
At 30 days
Aortic Valve Mean Gradient
Time Frame: At 30 days
Aortic valve mean gradient is a measure of the pressure gradient across the aortic valve measured by echocardiograph.
At 30 days
Number of Subjects With Paravalvular Leak (PVL)
Time Frame: At 30 days
At 30 days
NYHA Classification
Time Frame: At 30 days

NYHA Functional Classification is a system used to assess patient heart failure severity based on their limitations of physical activity. The four classes are described below:

Class I: No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, or shortness of breath.

Class II: Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain.

Class III: Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain.

Class IV: Symptoms of heart failure at rest. Any physical activity causes further discomfort.

Subjects' NYHA Classification based on above criteria was assessed during follow up, and subjects were assigned to one of four classifications. Results are presented as percentage of all available subjects who were assigned each functional class (I-IV).

At 30 days
EQ5D-3L Visual Analog Scale Value
Time Frame: At 30 days
The EQ-5D-3L consists of EuroQoL 5 questions and 3 answering levels. The rating of questions includes: Level 1 no problems; Level 2 some problems; Level 3 Significant problems; Worst case is 15 points; and best case is 5 points using index. The Visual analogue scale VAS 0-100 where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 the best imaginable health state."
At 30 days
Kaplan-Meier Rate of All-cause Mortality
Time Frame: At 12 months
Kaplan-Meier (KM) percentage of subjects who died. KM is a statistical method that attempts to account for other factors that may have reduced the number of subjects evaluable at a given time point.
At 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Stroke (including disabling and non-disabling)
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Bleeding (life-threatening, major, minor)
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Vascular access site and access-related complications (major and minor)
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Annular rupture
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Conversion to open surgery
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
VARC-2 definition of conversion to open surgery: Conversion to open sternotomy during the TAVI procedure secondary to any procedure-related complications
30 days from the index procedure
Coronary obstruction
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
As per VARC-2 criteria: Angiographic or echocardiographic evidence of a new, partial or complete, obstruction of a coronary ostium, either by the valve prosthesis itself, the native leaflets, calcifications, or dissection, occurring during or after the TAVI procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Valve embolization
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
As per VARC-2 criteria: The valve prosthesis moves during or after deployment such that it loses contact with the aortic annulus
30 days from the index procedure
Transcatheter valve-in-valve deployment
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Permanent pacemaker insertion
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
30 days from the index procedure
Delivery profile characteristics
Time Frame: At 30 days post index procedure
Delivery profile characteristics assess access vessel diameter, sheath utilization and sheath size
At 30 days post index procedure
Implant success
Time Frame: At 30 days post index procedure

Implant success defined as:

  1. Absence of procedural mortality
  2. Correct positioning of a single Portico prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
At 30 days post index procedure
Echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic valve performance
Time Frame: At 30 days post index procedure

Echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic valve performance include:

  1. Mean gradient
  2. Effective orifice area
  3. Paravalvular leak (PVL)
At 30 days post index procedure
Clinical improvement from baseline
Time Frame: At 30 days post index procedure

Clinical improvement from baseline assessed by:

  1. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class change from Baseline to 30 days
  2. Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire (EQ5D-3L) changes from baseline to 30 days
At 30 days post index procedure
All-cause mortality All-cause mortality All-cause mortality
Time Frame: At 30 days post index procedure
At 30 days post index procedure
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: At 12 months post index procedure
At 12 months post index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helge Möllmann, St. Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
  • Study Director: Vinny Podichetty, Abbott Structural Heart

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Portico™ Valve, Portico Delivery System(s) and Loading System(s)

Subscribe