- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01802788
5 Year Observation of Patients With PORTICO Valves (PORTICO-1)
International Long-term Follow-up Study of Patients Implanted With a Portico™ Valve
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is an international multicenter, prospective, non-randomized clinical investigation without concurrent or matched control, designed to assess the mid-term safety and performance of the Portico valve in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis whom are high risk for surgical valve replacement. The primary endpoint is 1 year all-cause mortality. In addition, the performance and safety profile of the Portico valve will be further evaluated at 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years post-implant.
The investigation will be conducted at approximately 65 centers in approximately 15 countries in Europe, Middle-East, Africa, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Adelaide, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital
-
Adelaide, Australia
- St Andrews Hospital
-
Auchenflower, Australia
- Heart Care Partners-Wesley Hospital
-
Chermside, Australia
- The Prince Charles Hospital
-
Leonards Hill, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital
-
Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital
-
Parkville, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital - City Campus
-
Perth, Australia
- Fiona Stanley Hospital
-
St Leonards, Australia
- North Shore Private Hospital
-
Woolloongabba, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Antwerp, Belgium
- AZ Middelheim
-
Bruxelles, Belgium
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
-
Liege, Belgium
- CHR Citadelle
-
-
-
-
-
Calgary, Canada
- Foothills Medical Centre
-
Halifax, Canada
- Queen Elizabeth II Heath Sciences
-
Montreal, Canada
- Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal (Montreal Heart Inst.)
-
Ottawa, Canada
- Ottawa Heart Institute
-
Quebec, Canada
- Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Hospital Laval)
-
Saint John, Canada
- Saint John Regional Hospital - New Brunswick Heart Centre
-
Toronto, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital
-
Vancouver, Canada
- St. Paul's Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Rigshospitalet
-
-
-
-
-
Rennes, France
- CHRU Hopital de Pontchaillou
-
Toulouse, France
- Clinique Pasteur Toulouse
-
Toulouse, France
- CHU Rangueil Toulouse
-
-
-
-
-
Bad Nauheim, Germany
- Kerckhoff-Klinik gGmbH
-
Berlin, Germany
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
-
Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF)
-
Bernau, Germany
- Immanuelklinikum Bernau und Herzzentrum Brandenburg
-
Dortmund, Germany
- St Johannes Hospital
-
Dresden, Germany
- Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH Universitätsklinik
-
Frankfurt, Germany
- Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
-
Göttingen, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Georg-August-Universität
-
Hamburg, Germany
- UKE Hamburg (Universitatsklinik Eppendorf)
-
Hamburg, Germany
- Asklepios Klinikum St Georg
-
Jena, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Jena
-
Karlsruhe, Germany
- Stadtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH Medizinischen Klinik I
-
Leipzig, Germany
- Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH
-
Munchen, Germany
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München des Freistaates Bayern
-
-
-
-
-
Reẖovot, Israel
- Kaplan Medical Center
-
-
-
-
-
Alessandria, Italy
- Clinica Citta di Alessandria
-
Catania, Italy
- Azienda Ospedali V. Emanuele Ferrarotto E S. Bambino
-
Massa, Italy
- Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio - Ospedale del Cuore
-
Milan, Italy
- Ospedale San Raffaele
-
Milan, Italy
- Istituto Sant'Ambrogio
-
Milan, Italy
- Ospedale Niguarda Ca'Granda
-
Milan, Italy
- PoliclinicoSan Donato
-
Milano, Italy
- Centro Cardiologico Monzino
-
Monza, Italy
- Policlinico di Monza
-
-
-
-
-
Vilnius, Lithuania
- Vilnius University Hospital Santarisku KLinikos
-
-
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands
- OLVG
-
Leeuwarden, Netherlands
- Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
-
El Palmar, Spain
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de Arrixaca
-
Sevilla, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
-
-
-
-
-
Zurich, Switzerland
- Universitatspital Spital Zurich
-
-
-
-
-
Belfast, United Kingdom
- Royal Victoria Hospital
-
Brighton, United Kingdom
- The Royal Sussex Country Hospital
-
London, United Kingdom
- Kings College Hospital
-
Morriston, United Kingdom
- Morriston hospital-ABM University Health Board
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
The study population comprises of Cohort A and Cohort B with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS).
Cohort A: Patients enrolled directly into the Portico I study.
Cohort B: Patients implanted in previous SJM-sponsored regulatory (pre-market) investigations and first-in-human trials whom consent for ongoing follow-up in the Portico I study after the completion of their participation in the initial study.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient has signed the Patient Informed Consent prior to participating in the clinical investigation.
- Patient has been referred for a Portico Valve implant as per Heart Team decision or patient has received a Portico Valve as per participation in an SJM sponsored regulatory or first-in-human trial.
Patient has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis confirmed by echocardiographically derived criteria*:
- An initial aortic valve area (AVA) of less than or equal to (≤) 1.0 cm2 (or indexed EOA less than or equal to (≤) 0.6 cm2/m2) AND
- A mean gradient greater than (>)40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than (>)4.0 m/s or Doppler Velocity Index less than (<)0.25. If the mean gradient is <40 mmHg and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <55%, then the site may as well perform a dobutamine stress echo to see if the mean gradient increases to >40 mmHg." (Baseline measurement taken by echo within 6 months of index procedure.)
- Patient has a life expectancy more than (>) 12 months.
For patients enrolled in a French site:
Patient is at high risk for surgery as demonstrated by a Logistic EuroSCORE equal or more than (≥) 20 and/or a Society of Thoracic Surgeon (STS) mortality risk score of more than (>) 10% and/or by clinical judgment of the Heart Team based on the individual risk profile (comorbidities).
- Not applicable for a patient who has received a Portico Valve as per participation in an SJM sponsored Regulatory or First-In-Human trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any case in which the Portico Valve would not be indicated for the patient as per current instructions for use (i.e any "off-label" use).
- Patient has any other aortic valve than tricuspid one.
- Patient has a prosthetic valve or ring in the aortic position.
- Patient needs a concomitant structural heart procedure..
- Patient needs the usage of an embolic protection device.
- Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with all clinical investigation-required follow-up evaluations.
- Patient is pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Cohort A
Patients implanted with a Portico valve after CE mark
|
Other Names:
|
Cohort B
Patients implanted in previous SJM-sponsored premarket studies
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality
Time Frame: 1 year post implant
|
Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 1 year post implantation
|
1 year post implant
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With All Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Cardiovascular Mortality as Defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year post implant
|
Percentage of participants that died for cardiovascular or unknown reasons as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days and 1 year post implantation
|
30 days and 1 year post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Myocardial Infarction as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year post implant
|
Percentage of participants with a myocardial infarction as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days and 1 year post implantation
|
30 days and 1 year post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)
Time Frame: 1 year post implant
|
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation
|
1 year post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Vascular Access Site Complication as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
Percentage of participants with vascular access site complication (major or minor) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Bleeding Events as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
Percentage of participants with a bleeding events (life threatening, major or minor) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Stage 2 and 3 Acute Kidney Injury as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
Percentage of participants with a Stage 2 or Stage 3 acute kidney injury as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Aortic Valve Area)
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
The aortic valve area as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Aortic Valve Area)
Time Frame: 1 year post implant
|
The aortic valve area as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 1 year post implantation
|
1 year post implant
|
Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Mean Transvalvular Gradient)
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
The mean transvalvular gradient as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Mean Transvalvular Gradient)
Time Frame: 1 year post implant
|
The mean transvalvular gradient as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 1 year post implantation
|
1 year post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation )
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
|
30 days post implant
|
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Time Frame: 1 year post implant
|
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation
|
1 year post implant
|
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations. |
30 days post implant
|
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
Time Frame: 1 year post implant
|
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations. |
1 year post implant
|
Mean Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 30 days post implant
|
Distance in metres that the participant can walk in 6 minutes.
The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is a commonly used objective measure of functional exercise capacity in individuals with moderately severe impairment.
|
30 days post implant
|
Mean Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 1 year post implant
|
Distance in metres that the participant can walk in 6 minutes.
The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is a commonly used objective measure of functional exercise capacity in individuals with moderately severe impairment.
|
1 year post implant
|
Mean Quality of Life Assessment
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year post implant
|
EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments.
A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status.
This scale ranges between 0-100, where 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine' and 100 is 'the best health you can imagine'.
|
30 days and 1 year post implant
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lars Søndergaard, DMSc, Rigshopitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen
- Principal Investigator: Francesco Maisano, MD, San Raffaele Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Stephen Worthley, St Andrews Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Josep Rodes-Cabau, Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Hospital Laval)
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CV-12-054-EU-PV
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis
-
Anteris Technologies Ltd.Active, not recruitingAortic Stenosis | Aortic Valve Calcification | Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisUnited States
-
The Medicines CompanyCompletedTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement | Aortic Valve Replacement | Severe Aortic StenosisNetherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, France, Italy, Switzerland
-
Anteris Technologies Ltd.Active, not recruitingAortic Valve Calcification | Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisGeorgia
-
Ningbo Jenscare Biotechnology Co., Ltd.UnknownAortic Regurgitation | Severe Aortic Stenosis
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAortic Valve Stenosis | Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency | Regurgitation, Aortic Valve | Aortic Valve IncompetenceUnited States
-
Sorin Group USA, Inc.TerminatedAortic Valve Stenosis | Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency | Regurgitation, Aortic Valve | Aortic Valve IncompetenceUnited States
-
Edwards LifesciencesActive, not recruitingAortic Stenosis | Aortic Regurgitation | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisChina
-
BC Centre for Improved Cardiovascular HealthEdwards LifesciencesUnknownTranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation | Severe Aortic StenosisCanada
-
Genesis Medtech CorporationRecruitingDiseases of Aortic Valve | Aortic Stenosis DiseaseChina
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruiting
Clinical Trials on St Jude Medical Portico replacement aortic valve
-
On-X Life Technologies, Inc.CompletedHeart Valve DiseaseUnited States, Canada, Netherlands, India, Australia, Germany, Norway, South Africa, Sweden
-
Abbott Medical DevicesWithdrawn
-
Abbott Medical DevicesRecruitingAortic Valve StenosisUnited States, Australia
-
Abbott Medical DevicesWithdrawnSevere Symptomatic Aortic StenosisUnited Kingdom
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompleted
-
Abbott Medical DevicesTerminated
-
Direct Flow Medical, Inc.UnknownAortic Valve StenosisUnited States
-
Portuguese Society of CardiologyAbbott Medical Devices; Portuguese Association of Interventional CardiologyCompletedCoronary Artery DiseasePortugal
-
Direct Flow Medical, Inc.UnknownAortic Valve StenosisGermany, Italy
-
OptimapharmEdwards LifesciencesActive, not recruitingAortic Valve Stenosis | Heart Valve DiseasesUnited Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, Austria, Switzerland, Finland, Czechia, Belgium, Netherlands, Cyprus, Ireland