Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation on Motor Function in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

May 23, 2026 updated by: Betul Unal, Bahçeşehir University

Investigation of the Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation Therapy on Gross Motor Function, Upper Extremity Functional Skills, Activity, and Participation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of action observation therapy and motor imagery methods, provided in addition to a conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation program, on gross motor function, upper and lower extremity functional skills, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP), the ability to perform various hand activities is reduced. Sensory and motor impairments observed in the affected upper extremity are the main causes of functional limitations. These impairments restrict the ability to perform simple activities of daily living such as dressing, tooth brushing, hair combing, feeding, and playing, and also lead to limitations in activity and participation within a broader social context. Therefore, one of the primary goals of neurological rehabilitation in this population is to promote the effective use of the affected upper extremity in daily tasks by improving its capacity and performance, and to support the child's independence in daily living activities by enhancing skills and increasing participation in activities. However, approximately 75% of children with unilateral CP continue to demonstrate motor impairments in activities of daily living even when they participate in a comprehensive rehabilitation program including conventional physical therapy, orthotic use, and spasticity management. There is a need for new rehabilitation programs aimed at enhancing the effects of traditional treatments, which mainly involve motor interventions.

In CP rehabilitation, it is recommended to integrate motor training with environmental enrichment and to increase environmental stimuli in order to enhance task performance. These approaches are based on the implementation of real-life activity-based tasks through active movements, with high intensity and individualized goals. In this way, neuroplasticity is supported through attention, motivation, and intensive repetition. Furthermore, it is recommended that activity- and task-oriented motor training be complemented with cognitive interventions such as action observation therapy, motor imagery, and mirror therapy, which combine motor and cognitive rehabilitation approaches.

Motor imagery is the mental simulation of movement without any overt motor action and refers to the capacity to generate kinesthetic representations of motor actions. Motor imagery selectively stimulates the cognitive aspect of motor behavior and is considered a prerequisite for motor planning processes. Recent studies have shown that despite motor deficits related to movement execution in children with CP, the ability to imagine movements may remain preserved. Therefore, interventions focusing on motor planning and imagery have emerged as potential treatment options for CP. However, the number of studies investigating the effectiveness of motor imagery in the CP population is quite limited, and well-designed studies examining the effectiveness of motor imagery training in individuals with CP are needed.

Action Observation Therapy (AOT) is known to be a cognitive intervention used to improve various motor skills in patients with motor impairments. From a rehabilitation perspective, the mirror neuron system plays a major role in the human capacity to learn through imitation. Based on the mirror neuron system, action observation consists of systematically and repeatedly observing actions followed by the reproduction of the observed actions. Findings from studies using AOT have indicated that AOT improves activities of daily living and has been proposed as a novel neurophysiological approach focused on motor learning in CP rehabilitation. Nevertheless, well-designed studies investigating the effectiveness of action observation training in individuals with CP are still needed.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of Action Observation Therapy and motor imagery methods, provided in addition to conventional rehabilitation, on gross motor function, upper and lower extremity functional skills, and quality of life in children with CP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Recruiting
        • Kurtkoy Ozel Egitim ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezi
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Betul Unal, PhD (C)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being between 7 and 16 years of age
  • Having a diagnosis of unilateral cerebral palsy made by a pediatric neurologist
  • Being classified at levels I-II of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
  • Scoring above 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination for Children
  • Having no cognitive impairments (i.e., possessing an appropriate cognitive level to follow task instructions)
  • Willingness to participate in the study (child and family)
  • Being classified at levels I-III of the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) -Being classified at levels I-III of the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) -

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with uncontrolled seizures
  • Children who have received motor imagery training or action observation therapy within the last 6 months
  • Children with contractures
  • Children with severe visual and/or hearing impairments
  • Being classified at levels III, IV, or V according to the GMFCS
  • Scoring below 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination for Children
  • Being classified at levels IV-V of the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
  • Having undergone orthopedic surgery or botulinum toxin (Botox) treatment within the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Motor Imagery Group

Mental imagery practice will be applied in addition to conventional physiotherapy. A total of 10 movements supporting activities of daily living, including unimanual and bimanual upper extremity activities, walking, and balance activities, will be practiced from both first-person and third-person perspectives.

The intervention will be administered for 50 minutes per session, twice a week, for 8 weeks. The intervention protocol will consist of 20 minutes of conventional physiotherapy followed by 30 minutes of motor imagery practice.

Participants will receive treatment for 16 sessions in total, with 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks. Each session will last 50 minutes.

The motor imagery practice will consist of a total of 10 movements including unimanual and bimanual, walking and balance activities, and will be performed by participants from both first-person and third-person perspectives.

Balance activities:

  • Single-leg standing balance
  • Sit and stand up with your arms crossed in front of you while sitting in the chair.

Walking activities:

  • The child gets up from the chair without support, walks 3 meters, then returns and sits back down in the chair
  • Walking sideways and backward on different surfaces

Bimauel upper extremity activities

  • Putting on a blouse
  • Putting on and zipping up/down a dress with a front zipper.
  • Putting on shoes and tying the laces. Unimanual upper extremity activities
  • Taking food from the plate with a spoon and putting it in the mouth
  • Combing hair
  • Holding the doorknob and opening
Active Comparator: Action Observation Therapy Group:
Action observation therapy will be applied in adition to conventional physiotherapy. A total of 10 movements supporting activities of daily living, including unimanual and bimanual upper extremity activities, walking, and balance activities, will be practiced. In action observation therapy, after participants observe the movement (observation phase), they will be asked to imitate the observed movement (execution phase). The intervention will be administered for 50 minutes per session, twice a week, for 8 weeks. The intervention protocol will consist of 20 minutes of conventional physiotherapy followed by 30 minutes of action observation therapy.

Participants will receive treatment for 16 sessions in total, with 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks. Each session will last 50 minutes.

Action observation therapy will consist of a total of 10 movements including unimanual and bimanual, walking and balance activities. After participants observe the movement (observation phase), they are asked to imitate the movement they observed (execution phase).

Balance activities:

  • Single-leg standing balance
  • Sit and stand up with your arms crossed in front of you while sitting in the chair.

Walking activities:

  • The child gets up from the chair without support, walks 3 meters, then returns and sits back down in the chair
  • Walking sideways and backward on different surfaces

Bimauel upper extremity activities

  • Putting on a blouse
  • Putting on and zipping up/down a dress with a front zipper.
  • Putting on shoes and tying the laces. Unimanual upper extremity activities
  • Taking food from the plate with a spoon and putting it in the mouth
Active Comparator: Conventional physiotherapy group
Conventional physiotherapy training will be structured according to the child's symptoms and needs, and will consist of stretching, strengthening, normal walking training, postural control training, and weight-bearing training in different positions (sitting, standing, side-lying, prone).
Participants will receive treatment for 16 sessions in total, with 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks. Each session will last 50 minutes. Conventional physiotherapy training will be structured according to the child's symptoms and needs, and will consist of stretching, strengthening, normal walking training, postural control training, and weight-bearing training in different positions (sitting, standing, side-lying, prone).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ABILHAND-Kids
Time Frame: 0th week; 8th week

Manual ability in daily activities assessed using the ABILHAND-Kids questionnaire for children with cerebral palsy (measured as logit score using Rasch analysis). ABILHAND-Kids evaluates the child's perceived difficulty in performing daily bimanual activities, such as dressing (buttons, zippers), eating with utensils, using scissors or pencils, opening containers, handling small objects. Contains a list of everyday manual tasks Each item is rated based on difficulty: Impossible, difficult, easy. Higher scores indicate better manual ability.

Time Frame: 8 weeks

0th week; 8th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
Time Frame: 0th week; 8th week
Quality of life assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 Cerebral Palsy Module Child and Parent Reports. The 35-item questionnaire evaluates daily activities, school activities, movement and balance, pain, fatigue, eating activities, and speech and communication in children with cerebral palsy. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale and transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
0th week; 8th week
Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test
Time Frame: 0th week; 8th week

Hand function assessed using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), a standardized measure of fine and gross motor hand function during simulated activities of daily living. The test consists of seven subtests, including writing, page turning, lifting small objects, simulated feeding, stacking, and lifting light and heavy objects. Performance is measured as completion time in seconds for each subtest and total test time using a stopwatch. Measurement method: Each task is performed as quickly as possible. Time is measured in seconds with a stopwatch. Each task is recorded separately. Scoring system: Time elapsed for each subtest (in seconds) is used. Total score: sum of subtest times or total time separately for each hand.

Lower completion time indicates better hand function.

0th week; 8th week
The Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP)
Time Frame: 0th week; 8th week
The CASP questionnaire assesses an individual's community participation in home, school, and neighborhood settings. It consists of 20 questions in total, with 4 sub-sections: Home participation (6 questions), neighborhood and community participation (4 questions), school Participation (5 questions), and home and community activities (5 questions). Scoring system: 4 = expected for their age (full participation), 3= somewhat limited, very limited, 2=unable, and 1=not applicable. Total and/or domain scores are calculated, and scores transformed to a standardized 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better levels of participation in daily life activities.
0th week; 8th week
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)
Time Frame: 0th week; 8th week
Gross motor function assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88), a standardized assessment tool for children with cerebral palsy. The scale consists of 88 items across five domains: lying and rolling, sitting, crawling and kneeling, standing, and walking/running/jumping. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale according to the child's level of performance. Total scores range from 0 to 264, with higher scores indicating better gross motor function.
0th week; 8th week
Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: 0th week; 8th week
Functional mobility assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Participants are instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. Completion time is measured in seconds using a stopwatch. Lower completion times indicate better functional mobility.
0th week; 8th week
Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test
Time Frame: 0th week; 8th week
Lower extremity functional strength assessed using the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5xSTS). Participants are instructed to stand up and sit down five times as quickly as possible from a standard chair without using upper extremity support. Completion time is measured in seconds using a stopwatch. Lower completion times indicate better functional performance.
0th week; 8th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hasan K. Alptekin, Prof. Dr., Bahcesehir university
  • Study Director: Pelin Pisirici, Assoc. Prof., Bahcesehir university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be made available upon reasonable request after publication of the study results. Requests will be evaluated and approved by the principal investigator to ensure that the proposed use is methodologically sound and in accordance with ethical and institutional regulations. Data will be shared for academic and non-commercial research purposes only.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of the study results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified individual participant data will be available upon reasonable request. Requests will be reviewed and approved by the principal investigator for non-commercial academic research purposes only.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy (CP)

Clinical Trials on motor imagery

Subscribe