Effectiveness of Action Observation Training on Upper Limb Motor Function in Children with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abayneh Alamer, Haimanot Melese, Belaynew Adugna, Abayneh Alamer, Haimanot Melese, Belaynew Adugna

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to evaluate and examine the current best evidence for the effectiveness of action observation therapy on upper limb function rehabilitation in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. A comprehensive search of literature published between September 2010 and May 2020 was conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Scopus. Only randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of action observation therapy on upper limb motor function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy were included. PEDro scale was used to assess the risk of bias of included trials. This study was reported according to the guideline of the PRISMA statement. The overall methodological quality of the studies was done using the PEDro scale and GRADE approach. The primary outcome measures of this review were the Melbourne Assessment Scale, Assisting Hand Assessment scale to evaluate physical function and structures. Furthermore, the ABILHAND-Kids test, and Box and Block Test primary outcome measures were used to determine the subjects' activities and participation. Nine randomized controlled trials involving 234 participants were analyzed. The overall quality of evidence was rated from moderate to high. This review suggests action observation therapy was found to be a promising intervention for upper limb rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy.

Keywords: action observation training; hemiplegic CP; systematic review; upper extremity motor function.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.

© 2020 Alamer et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram. Note: Adapted from Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 6(7): e1000097.37

References

    1. Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(8):571–576. doi:10.1017/S001216220500112X
    1. Ferrari A, Cioni G. The Spastic Forms of Cerebral Palsy: A Guide to the Assessment of Adaptive Functions. Springer; 2009.
    1. Oskoui M, Coutinho F, Dykeman J, et al. An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(6):509–519. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12080
    1. Rosenbaum P, Gorter JW, Palisano R, et al. The relationship of cerebral palsy subtype and functional motor impairment: a population‐based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(7):682–683. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03652.x
    1. White DA, Christ SE. Executive control of learning and memory in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(7):920–924. doi:10.1017/S1355617705051064
    1. Steenbergen B, Gordon AM. Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: evidence for disorders in motor planning. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(9):780–783. doi:10.1017/S0012162206001666
    1. Uvebrant P. Hemiplegic cerebral palsy aetiology and outcome. Acta Paediatr. 1988;77:1–100.
    1. Gordon AM, Hung Y-C, Brandao M, et al. Bimanual training and constraint-induced movement therapy in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(8):692–702. doi:10.1177/1545968311402508
    1. Sakzewski L, Gordon A, Eliasson A-C. The state of the evidence for intensive upper limb therapy approaches for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2014;29(8):1077–1090. doi:10.1177/0883073814533150
    1. Hoare B, Imms C, Villanueva E, et al. Intensive therapy following upper limb botulinum toxin A injection in young children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(3):238–247. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12054
    1. Sarasso E, Gemma M, Agosta F, et al. Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review. Arch Physiother. 2015;5(1):14. doi:10.1186/s40945-015-0013-x
    1. Zhu M-H, Wang J, Gu X-D, et al. Effect of action observation therapy on daily activities and motor recovery in stroke patients. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;2(3):279–282. doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.08.006
    1. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Soc Neurosci. 2013;133–142.
    1. Dinomais M, Lignon G, Chinier E, et al. Effect of observation of simple hand movement on brain activations in patients with unilateral cerebral palsy: an fMRI study. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(6):1928–1937. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.020
    1. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res. 1996;3(2):131–141. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
    1. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13(2):400–404.
    1. Sgandurra G, Biagi L, Fogassi L, et al. Reorganization of the action observation network and sensory-motor system in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: an fMRI study. Neural Plast. 2018;2018:1–15. doi:10.1155/2018/6950547
    1. Buccino G, Arisi D, Gough P, et al. Improving upper limb motor functions through action observation treatment: a pilot study in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(9):822–828. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04334.x
    1. Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, et al. Upper limb children action-observation training (UP-CAT): a randomised controlled trial in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2011;11(1):80. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-11-80
    1. Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, et al. Randomized trial of observation and execution of upper extremity actions versus action alone in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(9):808–815. doi:10.1177/1545968313497101
    1. Borges LR, Fernandes AB, Melo LP, et al. Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10.
    1. Buchignani B, Beani E, Pomeroy V, et al. Action observation training for rehabilitation in brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):344. doi:10.1186/s12883-019-1533-x
    1. Peng T-H, Zhu J-D, Chen -C-C, et al. Action observation therapy for improving arm function, walking ability, and daily activity performance after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(8):1277–1285. doi:10.1177/0269215519839108
    1. Thieme H, Morkisch N, Rietz C, et al. The efficacy of movement representation techniques for treatment of limb pain—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2016;17(2):167–180. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.015
    1. Caligiore D, Mustile M, Spalletta G, et al. Action observation and motor imagery for rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and an integrative hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;72:210–222. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.005
    1. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
    1. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–721. doi:10.1093/ptj/83.8.713
    1. de Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):129–133. doi:10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70043-1
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–1302. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017
    1. Kim DH. Comparison of short-and long-time action observation training (AOT) on upper limb function in children with cerebral palsy. Physiother Pract Res. (Preprint):1–6.
    1. Simon-Martinez C, Mailleux L, Hoskens J, et al. Randomized controlled trial combining constraint-induced movement therapy and action-observation training in unilateral cerebral palsy: clinical effects and influencing factors of treatment response. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020;13:1756286419898065. doi:10.1177/1756286419898065
    1. Kim JY, Kim J-M, Ko EY. The effect of the action observation physical training on the upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. J Exerc Rehabil. 2014;10(3):176. doi:10.12965/jer.140114
    1. Simon-Martinez C, Mailleux L, Jaspers E, et al. Effects of combining constraint-induced movement therapy and action-observation training on upper limb kinematics in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–15.
    1. Buccino G, Molinaro A, Ambrosi C, et al. Action observation treatment improves upper limb motor functions in children with cerebral palsy: a combined clinical and brain imaging study. Neural Plast. 2018;2018:1–11. doi:10.1155/2018/4843985
    1. Kirkpatrick E, Pearse J, James P, et al. Effect of parent‐delivered action observation therapy on upper limb function in unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(10):1049–1056. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13109
    1. Kim D-H, An D-H, Yoo W-G. Effects of live and video form action observation training on upper limb function in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Technol Health Care. 2018;26(3):437–443. doi:10.3233/THC-181220
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6(7):e1000097..
    1. Iacoboni M, Koski LM, Brass M, et al. Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(24):13995–13999. doi:10.1073/pnas.241474598
    1. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19(1):55–63. doi:10.1097/00146965-200603000-00007
    1. Biagi L, Cioni G, Fogassi L, et al. Action observation network in childhood: a comparative fMRI study with adults. Dev Sci. 2016;19(6):1075–1086. doi:10.1111/desc.12353

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe