Intrarenal Pressure in Suctioning vs. Non-suctioning Sheaths

May 26, 2026 updated by: Mantu Gupta, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Comparing the Intrarenal Pressure Between Suctioning and Non-Suctioning Access Sheaths Using the LithoVue Elite Ureteroscope System

Interest in monitoring intrarenal pressure (IRP) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has grown, especially due to its potential association with improved postoperative efficiency and safety. A prominent technique for managing IRP during fURS is the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS), which are known to reduce IRP. Suction-equipped access sheaths provide additional benefits by continuously evacuating dust and stone fragments during the procedure, potentially enhancing stone-free rates. However, IRP during suctioning procedures has yet to be thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study is to compare the IRP during fURS using UAS with and without suctioning technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Interest in monitoring intrarenal pressure (IRP) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has grown, especially due to its potential association with improved postoperative efficiency and safety. With advances in technology, precise tools like the LithoVue™ Elite now enables continuous IRP measurement, facilitating accurate data collection throughout the procedure. A prominent technique for managing IRP during fURS is the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS), which are known to reduce IRP. Suction-equipped access sheaths provide additional benefits by continuously evacuating dust and stone fragments during the procedure, potentially enhancing stone-free rates (SFR). However, IRP during suctioning procedures has yet to be thoroughly investigated. This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing continuous intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurements during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) using a suctioning ureteral access sheath (UAS) versus a non-suctioning UAS. The study will be conducted over an 18-month period and will include all patients over 18 years of age who are scheduled to undergo fURS for a stone burden greater than 1 cm and/or multiple stones. Patients who are pregnant, have an untreated urinary tract infection (UTI), urinary tract anomalies such as urinary diversion, ureteral reconstruction, or horseshoe kidney, or who have a single stone smaller than 1 cm will be excluded from participation. All procedures will take place at Mount Sinai West, with patients enrolled from the practices of two endourology-trained specialists, Dr. William Atallah and Dr. Mantu Gupta. Participants will be randomized to either the suctioning-UAS arm using the ClearPETRA Flexible and Navigable Suction UAS or the non-suctioning-UAS arm using the BSC Navigator device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10019
        • Mount Sinai West

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Adults aged 18 years and older.
  • Diagnosed with kidney stones and scheduled for fURS.
  • Stone burden > 1 cm and/or multiple stones will be eligible.
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Pregnant persons as determined by pre-operative urine pregnancy test (standard of care at our institution)
  • Untreated UTI
  • Patients with urinary anomalies (e.g., urinary diversion, ureteral reconstruction, horseshoe kidney)
  • Single stone < 1 cm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Suctioning-UAS
Placement of the ClearPETRA Flexible and Navigable Suction UAS during flexible ureteroscopy with continuous suction applied during stone treatment.
Participants undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) will receive a suctioning ureteral access sheath using the ClearPETRA Flexible and Navigable Suction UAS. Continuous intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurements will be recorded throughout the procedure using the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope system.
Active Comparator: Non-suctioning-UAS
Placement of the BSC Navigator during flexible ureteroscopy without suction during stone treatment.
Participants undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) will receive a standard non-suctioning ureteral access sheath using the BSC Navigator device. Continuous intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurements will be recorded throughout the procedure using the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intrarenal Pressure (IRP) During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Time Frame: Intraoperative (during procedure)
Continuous measurement of intrarenal pressure using the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope system.
Intraoperative (during procedure)
Time spent above Intrarenal Pressure (IRP) threshold during Flexible Ureteroscopy
Time Frame: Intraoperative (during procedure)
Time spent above Intrarenal Pressure (IRP) thresholds of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mmHg using the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope system.
Intraoperative (during procedure)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone-Free Rate (SFR) on Postoperative CT Imaging
Time Frame: 4-8 weeks postoperatively
Rate of stone-free status assessed by non-contrast CT scan using a 4-grade scale (Grade A: completely stone-free; Grade B: residual fragments <2 mm; Grade C: residual fragments 2-4 mm; Grade D: residual fragments >4 mm).
4-8 weeks postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Score (VAS)
Time Frame: In the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), prior to discharge on the day of surgery (on average 1.5 hours post operatively)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score. Scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable); higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
In the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), prior to discharge on the day of surgery (on average 1.5 hours post operatively)
Number of Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: 30 days postoperatively
Number of any postoperative complications occurring within 30 days of the procedure (as defined by the study protocol and standard Clavien-Dindo classification or similar).
30 days postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mantu Gupta, MD, Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

To to protect participant privacy

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis

Clinical Trials on Suctioning-UAS

Subscribe