Pathogenesis of Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis: Role of Pioglitazone/Weight Loss

February 28, 2024 updated by: Khashayar Sakhaee, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
The investigators will randomize overweight and obese iuan patients to Pio (45 mg/day, highest approved dose or placebo), WL (10% of body weight, following the established program used in the Diabetes Prevention Program), or Pio+WL. Participants will be evaluated at baseline and after 24 weeks of intervention while on a fixed metabolic diet to exclude the confounding effects of diet and perspiration. The primary endpoint will be change in upH, and multiple additional endpoints (serum, urine, imaging) will be assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In IUAN patients, the investigator will compare 1. PPAR activation; 2. weight loss; or 3. combination; on urine acid-base parameters relevant to UA stone risk. The investigator will assess the effect of these interventions on fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and serum adiponectin, and correlate these changes with urine chemistry.

Hypothesis: Weight loss + TZD independently result in durable changes in urine chemistry.

Significance: Epidemiology of uric acid nephrolithiasis: Nephrolithiasis is an increasingly prevalent condition that leads to significant pain1, work productivity loss2, reduced quality of life3, urinary tract infection4, chronic kidney disease5,6 and end-stage renal disease7. In the U.S., nephrolithiasis prevalence doubled in the past 30 years to a level similar to diabetes, and is the most expensive non-malignant urologic condition (2006 U.S. annual cost: $10 billion)8. Compared with other stone types, uric acid stones recur at a higher rate9, lead to more CKD10, and comprise a rising fraction of stones11,12 , in part due to the growing prevalence of obesity and diabetes13-18. The single most important pathogenic factor in human IUAN is an overly acidic urine, promoting protonation of urate to the insoluble UA16,19. In previously completed NIH-supported studies, the Investigator identified increased net acid excretion and blunted ammoniagenesis to be the principal metabolic defects underlying aciduria in humans IUAN and in rodent models of IUAN risk16,18,20-23. Treatment has been empirical urinary alkalinization24 which is efficacious but has not changed since 1986. Limitations include frequent dosing25, need for high dose in obese patients26, medication intolerance27, and need for periodic urine collections disliked by patients. Therapy that targets the underlying pathophysiologic defect rather than urinary chemistry is directly needed. The Investigator showed that the thiazolidinedione (TZD) pioglitazone that activates PPAR, improves systemic and urinary abnormalities in IUAN including impaired excessive acid excretion and ammoniagenesis, and results in a rise in UpH. TZD treatment of rodent IUAN model shows similar improvements28. The Investigator may have a therapy targeting the underlying pathobiology.

The translational potential of our regimen is extremely high and immediate. If combined TZD and weight loss (Aim) are efficacious in reducing stone risk, one can move straight to a clinical trial using hard outcomes such as stone events, and stone count by imaging to test this regimen. None of these maneuvers requires FDA approval to initiate. Patients will then have instant control of urinary chemistry with empiric alkali therapy (existing therapy), but also a chance to achieve more lasting improvement with TZD and weight loss, which reverses the pathophysiology. Separately, adiponectin (APN) receptor agonists are being developed as potential pharmacological agents for the management of metabolic syndrome complications including diabetes and dyslipidemia29,30. If approved, such agents could be tested as therapy for aciduria in the metabolic syndrome if adiponectin mediates the impact of TZD on renal ammoniagenesis.

UA nephrolithiasis is the clinically palpable sentinel of some complex underlying systemic pathophysiology; hence the impact of these studies extends beyond UA stones. The Investigator is examining a novel multi-organ paradigm of increased acid production from the gut that escapes hepatic metabolism, and ending up as an acid load imposed on the kidney. When compounded with renal ammoniagenesis defect, this leads to aciduria and UA lithogenesis. The Investigator will address some fundamental pathobiologic mechanisms of the metabolic syndrome. Due to the time and budget limits, the Investigator will concentrate our efforts to yield informative data; hence the renal focus. Our long-term goal is to use this as a portal to study multiple aspects of the gut, hepatic, and adipose pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Idiopathic uric acid nephrolithiasis, with last stone analysis showing that stone has >90% uric acid in composition Age >21 years Any gender, race/ethnicity (from weight loss), but weight <165 Kg (to fit into MR instrument); eGFR>60ml/min/1.73 m2

Exclusion Criteria:

Bariatric surgery, chronic diarrhea, recurrent UTIs current insulin use use of a thiazolidinedione in past 2 years contraindication to thiazolidinedione use (liver dz, pedal edema, CHF NYHA class III/IV, no contraception) Bladder cancer Use of SGLT2-i, GLP-1 analogs, gemfibrozil, topiramate, rifampin Hba1c > 8.5%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pioglitazone Drug (including Placebo)
45 mg/day- one pioglitazone tablet once daily throughout the 24 weeks of the study
45 mg/day- one pioglitazone tablet once daily throughout the 24 weeks of the study
Experimental: Weight Loss, Behavioral
Weight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention.
Weight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention.
Other: Pioglitazone + Weight Loss
Pioglitazone 45 mg/day + Weight Loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention.
Pioglitazone + Weight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urine pH
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24-hour urine pH is the main determinant of uric acid stone formation and recurrence.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urine Ammonium/Net Acid Excretion
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The ratio of urine ammonium to net acid excretion (NH4+/NAE) is a key pathophysiologic risk factor to uric acid stone formation. This is calculated from 24 hr urine ammonium and 24 hr urine net acid excretion.
24 weeks
Urine Net Acid Excretion/Sulphate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Urine Net Acid Excretion to Sulphate ratio represents the diet-independent fraction of acid excreted. This is calculated from 24 hr urine net acid excretion and 24 hr urine sulphate.
24 weeks
Supersaturation Index of Uric Acid
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Supersaturation Index of Uric Acid is a calculated parameters that indicates the degree of urinary saturation with respect to uric acid.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Khashayar Sakhaee, MD, UTSW

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis, Uric Acid

Clinical Trials on Pioglitazone 45 mg

3
Subscribe