Comparison of Trans-Stomial Bladder Lithotripsy Using Mini-Percutaneous Equipment Versus Trans-stomial Bladder Lithotripsy Using Flexible Fibroscope, Percutaneous Approach and Open Cystolithotomy in Patients With Continent Catheterizable Urinary Reservoir (Mini-DUCC)

June 8, 2026 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

The urological management of neurological patients is crucial to ensure patient survival and improve their quality of life. The natural progression of disease in central neurological bladders typically involves a major decrease in both bladder capacity and contractile function, often necessitating cystectomy. One alternative to urinary reconstruction is continent catheterizable urinary diversion (e.g., Miami pouch, Mitrofanoff, Monti, etc.). A common complication of these diversions is the formation of intravesical stones, which require surgical management. When the urethra allows access to the urinary diversion, the gold standard is transurethral lithotripsy using a cystoscope; however, when this is not feasible, several techniques exist, albeit without clear recommendations.

In the literature, the most frequently discussed techniques include bladder dilation, percutaneous bladder lithotripsy using nephrolithotripsy (NLPC) equipment, and trans-stomal lithotripsy using a flexible fibroscope. Although bladder dilation has shown higher complication rates in case series compared to other techniques, there is very little comparative data between the percutaneous and trans-stomal methods in the literature. Case series indicate a higher risk of fistula formation with the percutaneous technique for urinary diversions performed in the gastrointestinal tract as compared to native bladder diversions, and a risk of stenosis or loss of continence with the trans-stomal technique.

At the Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), the Urology Department of the Lyon Sud Hospital has expertise in neuro-urology with a large cohort of patients presenting continent catheterizable urinary diversions, and the Urology Department of Edouard Herriot Hopspital has expertise in NLPC, particularly with the use of mini-NLPC (smaller nephroscope diameter). The synergy between these two departments has enabled the creation of a large cohort, with frequent use of the percutaneous route for bladder lithotripsy and, since 2020, the trans-stomal route using mini-NLPC equipment.

Therefore, given the limited data available in the literature, this retrospective comparative study would provide stronger evidence to improve the management of these patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Hôpital Edouard Herriot
        • Contact:
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69495

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Major patients with a continent cutaneous urinary diversion, followed in the urology departments of Lyon Sud Hospital and Édouard Herriot Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient (aged 18 years or older)
  • Patient with a catheterizable continent urinary diversion
  • History of surgical intervention via vesicolithotomy, percutaneous cystolitholapaxy, trans-stomal cystolitholapaxy, or flexible endoscopic laser cystolithotripsy via the continent stoma between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2024
  • Patient has expressed non-opposition to participate in the research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Percutaneous or trans-stomal surgery for foreign body removal
  • Postoperative follow-up period of less than 1 month after lithotripsy (Except for Clavien-Dindo Grade V cases)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Trans-Stomal Bladder Lithotripsy Using Mini-Percutaneous Equipment
Patient operated on using Trans-Stomal Bladder Lithotripsy Using Mini-Percutaneous Equipment
Patients of all groups will answer this quality of life questionnaire that has been specially designed for the study
Patients of all groups will answer this validated quality of life questionnaire
Trans-stomial bladder lithotripsy using flexible fibroscope
Patient operated on using Trans-stomial bladder lithotripsy using flexible fibroscope
Patients of all groups will answer this quality of life questionnaire that has been specially designed for the study
Patients of all groups will answer this validated quality of life questionnaire
Percutaneous cystholithotripsy
Patient operated on using Percutaneous cystholithotripsy
Patients of all groups will answer this quality of life questionnaire that has been specially designed for the study
Patients of all groups will answer this validated quality of life questionnaire
Open Cystolithotomy
Patient operated on using Open Cystolithotomy
Patients of all groups will answer this quality of life questionnaire that has been specially designed for the study
Patients of all groups will answer this validated quality of life questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Residual stone size greater than 4mm postoperatively.
Time Frame: Up to 7 days after surgery
Residual stone size greater than 4mm postoperatively will be investigated on imaging control
Up to 7 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qol-DUCC questionnaire answers
Time Frame: At inclusion
answers to the Qol-DUCC questionnaire will be analysed to assess patient quality of life
At inclusion
Qualiveen questionnaire score
Time Frame: At inclusion
The Qualiveen questionnaire score will be analysed to assess patient quality of life
At inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nadia ABID, MD, PhD, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Calculi

Clinical Trials on QoL-DUCC questionnaire

Subscribe