WE-CARE Community Health Forums to Increase Breast Cancer Screening and Clinical Trial Participation for Rural and Low Income Women

June 8, 2026 updated by: Mayo Clinic

A Community Engagement Approach to Increasing Breast Cancer Screening and Clinical Trial Participation in Low Income and Rural Populations ('WE-CARE')

This clinical trial tests how well the Women's Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources, and Education (WE-CARE) community health forums work to increase breast cancer screening and clinical trial participation for rural and low income women. Despite advances in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in the past decade, rural-dwelling and underserved women, and Black, Indigenous, and people of color continue to experience low rates of breast cancer screening. Since the survival rate for breast cancer is largely dependent on stage at which it is diagnosed, later stage breast cancer is correlated to a poorer prognosis and higher mortality rate. The WE-CARE community health forms address structural barriers through culturally tailored educational sessions on breast cancer risk, screening and clinical trials, survivor storytelling to humanize cancer and research and patient navigation to facilitate mammogram screening and address barriers. The WE-CARE community health forums may be an effective way to increase breast cancer screening and clinical trial participation for rural and low income women.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Stephanie Larson
  • Phone Number: 715-838-1976

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Eau Claire, Wisconsin, United States, 54701
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pravesh Sharma, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Stephanie Larson
          • Phone Number: 715-838-1976

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Be between the ages of 50 and 74 years
  • Have no prior history of breast cancer screening (i.e., who have either never received a mammogram or have not had one in the past five years)
  • Reside in a rural community in Wisconsin or belong to low income (self-reported)
  • Be able to speak and understand English or Spanish
  • Be willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who have received a mammogram within the past five years
  • Have a current or prior diagnosis of breast cancer
  • Are currently undergoing treatment for any active malignancy
  • Have cognitive or psychiatric impairments that, in the judgment of the study team, would preclude meaningful participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health services research (WE-CARE forum)
Patients attend a WE-CARE community forum, over 2 hours. At the forum, patients attend educational sessions on breast cancer risk, screening and clinical trials as well as survivor storytelling sessions by community companions who have participated in clinical research for breast cancer. Patients also receive navigation support to facilitate mammography, address barriers, support scheduling, coordinate follow-up, and provide real-time guidance on screening and matching with clinical trials or registries.
Attend education sessions at WE-CARE forum
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational
Receive navigation support
Other Names:
  • Patient Navigator Program
Attend storytelling sessions at WE-CARE forum
Other Names:
  • Supportive Therapy
  • Symptom Management
  • Therapy, Supportive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment yield
Time Frame: At time of forum
Assessed via the number enrolled divided by the number of eligible participants approached.
At time of forum
Exposure reach (community level reach)
Time Frame: At time of forum
Assessed by the number of attendees divided by the estimated number of population indirectly exposed (e.g., via flyers, social media, community announcements).
At time of forum
Retention
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months
Assessed by the number of participants who complete 3-month follow-up.
From baseline to 3 months
Perceived participant satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of forum
Success is defined as ≥ 75% of participants rating the experience ≥ 4 on a 5-point scale rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater perceived satisfaction.
Immediately following completion of forum
Perceived barriers to engagement and community impact
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of forum
Assessed by post-intervention focus groups and brief qualitative interviews. Results will be analyzed descriptively.
Immediately following completion of forum
Perceived facilitators to engagement and community impact
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of forum
Assessed by post-intervention focus groups and brief qualitative interviews. Results will be analyzed descriptively.
Immediately following completion of forum
Perceived acceptability - AIM
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of forum
Assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), which consists of 4 items (e.g., meets my approval, is appealing to me) each rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability.
Immediately following completion of forum
Perceived appropriateness - IAM
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of forum
Assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), which consists of 4 items (e.g., seems fitting, seems like a good match) each rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree.
Immediately following completion of forum
Perceived feasibility - FIM
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of forum
Assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), which consists of 4 items (e.g., seems implementable, seems easy to use) each rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability.
Immediately following completion of forum

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in breast cancer screening intention
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Assessed using the Risk Behavior Diagnosis Scale (RBDS), which consists of 12 items each rated on a 7-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 7=strongly agree. Higher scores reflect greater intention to engage in screening behavior.
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Chang in breast cancer screening behavior
Time Frame: At 6 months post-forum
For participants who have never had a mammogram, a follow-up question at six months post-forum will document self-reported mammography completion. Verification will be optional and used only to evaluate feasibility of data collection. Results will be analyzed descriptively.
At 6 months post-forum
Perceived trust in medical researchers
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Will be assessed using the Trust in Medical Researchers Scale, which consists of 4 items each rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. higher scores indicating greater perceived trust. Results will be analyzed descriptively.
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Change in perceived research readiness
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Indicators of research interest will be assessed using descriptively based on subsequent participant enrollment in observational research.
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pravesh Sharma, MD, Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Educational Intervention

Subscribe