- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07651059
3D Titanium Plates for Mandibular Body Fracture Fixation
The Use of 3d Titanium Plates With Two Different Profile Thickness for Open Reduction and Rigid Fixation of Mandibular Body Fracture : Randomised Clinical Trial
Mandibular body fracture pose significant challenges in maxillofacial surgery due to their frequency, potential for functional impairment, and aesthetic concerns. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using titanium plates and screws have revolutionized the management of mandibular fractures.
Recent advancements in technology have led to the development of patient-specific 3D titanium implants, offering the potential for improved anatomical fit and stability. Moreover, the concept of low-profile implants has gained traction, aiming to minimize soft tissue irritation and enhance patient comfort postoperatively.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Facial trauma is common in road traffic accidents (RTA). Due to modernization, increased number of vehicles and failure to follow traffic rules are among various causes of facial trauma. Mandible is one of the frequently fractured bones in RTA. It has been observed that the most common sites of mandibular fracture are angle, body, and ramus.
The incidence of mandibular fracture ranges between 40% and 65% of all facial fractures and so are twice as common as fractures of the midfacial bones. Fractures of the angle of mandible can present with long term disabling sequelae and make up 23%-42% of all fractures in the mandible.
Other than traumatic injuries of the face, there are several factors leading to mandibular body fracture as direct impact or blunt force trauma, indirect trauma to the chin or side of the face, facial fractures, osteoporosis, tumors or cysts in the jawbone, some dental procedures, elderly population, and occupational hazards.
Long term sequel of untreated or poorly treated fractures includes various impairments such as functional, aesthetic, neurological and psychological. The main goal in the treatment of bone fracture is to predictably restore its preinjury anatomical form, with associated aesthetics and function. Techniques for treatment of mandibular fracture have evolved significantly in past decades. These techniques have ranged from closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation, open reduction with wire osteosynthesis, to open reduction with either rigid internal fixation or adaptive miniplate fixation.
They are best managed by placing one single plate in neutral zone that is sub-apically along with arch bar as tension band. However, in case of severely displaced fractures, inadequate dentition or presence of associated fractures, there are changes in biomechanical vector of forces, which demands for rigid fixation like two plates or load-bearing fixation.
Monocortical plates stabilize the fracture two-dimensionally which can be inadequate fixation in the above-mentioned situations especially in load-bearing area that has led to development of 3D plates. 3D plates are quadrangular in geometry providing stability three-dimensionally due to its design and compact form which counteract against the torsional forces especially in intermental foramen region.
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using titanium plates and screws have become the standard of care for stabilizing displaced mandibular body fracture, facilitating proper alignment, and promoting optimal healing. However, the optimal design and thickness of these implants remain subjects of debate among maxillofacial surgeons.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Giza Governorate
-
Cairo, Giza Governorate, Egypt
- Dentistery Hospital, Cairo Universiy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Age ranging between 20-60 years.
- Patients with mandibular body fractures requiring open reduction and fixation.
- Patients with good health (ASA-I and ASA-II) without any contraindication for surgery or anesthesia.
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with pre-existing neurological or musculoskeletal disease.
- Patients with infected fractures.
- Patients with simultaneous condylar fracture.
- Patients with regional malignancy.
- Medically compromised patients.
- Patients with blood diseases or severe renal disorders. Patients refuse to share in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A (3d titanium plates of 2 mm):
About 9 patients suffered from mandibular fracture treated by using 3d titanium plates of 2 mm thickness.
|
to compare the 3D titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and fixation of mandibular body fracture.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B (3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm):
About 9 patients suffered from mandibular fracture treated by using 3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm thickness.
|
to compare the 3D titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and fixation of mandibular body fracture.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment of Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 48 Hours from the operation
|
Treatment of the pain resulted from using 3d titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and fixation of mandibular body fracture by using a standardized pain scale.
|
48 Hours from the operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of postoperative Complications
Time Frame: from1 week to 6 months
|
Secondary outcomes will be evaluated to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of using 3D titanium plates with different profile thicknesses in the fixation of mandibular body fractures (as infection, malocclusion, and hardware-related complications).
|
from1 week to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Mohamed Atef, Professor, of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Kasr Al-Aini
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Mandibular Fracture Fixation
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mandibular Body Fracture
-
Alexandria UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandibular Angle FractureEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingPediatric Mandibular FractureEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedMandibular Sub-condylar FractureEgypt
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedPolyetheretherketone | Three Dimensional | Mandibular Angle FractureEgypt
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandibular Fracture | Virtual Plan of Mandibular FractureEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownMinimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedAnterior Mandibular FractureEgypt
-
Services Institute of Medical Sciences, PakistanNot yet recruitingSurgical Approach & Incisions | Mandibular Angle FracturePakistan
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandible Fracture | Mandibular Fracture TraumaEgypt
Clinical Trials on 3D Titanium Plates
-
Alexandria UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
The University of Hong KongChinese University of Hong KongCompletedMaxillofacial Injuries | Dentofacial Deformities | Mandibular Neoplasms | Maxillary NeoplasmsHong Kong
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Esraa Mosad TawfikNot yet recruitingMandibular Sub-condylar Fracture
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingOrthognathic SurgeryEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingAccuracy of 3D Printed Titanium Plates Versus 3D Milled Titanium Plates in Genioplasty Orthognathic Surgery | Patient Specific Genioplasty | Accuracy of 3D Printed Titanium Plates Versus 3D Milled Titanium Plates in Genioplasty
-
Zimmer BiometCompletedTumor | Neuroma | Mandibular Fractures | Treacher Collins Syndrome | Facial Fracture | Fibrous Dysplasia | Hemifacial Microsomia | Miller Syndrome | Osteoma of Mandibular Condyle | Cleft Face | Nager SyndromeArgentina
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingMandible Fracture | Polyetheretherketone | Condylar Neck Fractures
-
Azhar UniversityCompleted