- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07675811
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fel d 1 Monoclonal Antibodies in Adult and Pediatric Participants With Allergic Conjunctivitis Due to Cat Allergy
A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Fel d 1 Monoclonal Antibodies in Participants With Allergic Conjunctivitis Due to Cat Allergy
This study is researching two experimental medicines, freneslerbart and mevonlerbart. Freneslerbart and mevonlerbart can be given alone or together. When given together, the medicine is called "REGN-2Cat". These medicines are also known as the "study drugs".
The aim of the study is to see what side effects freneslerbart, mevonlerbart, and REGN-2Cat may have and if they help reduce eye allergy symptoms caused by cat hair/dander compared with a placebo.
The study is looking at several other research questions, including:
- How much study drug is in the blood at different times
- Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the drug less effective or could lead to side effects)
- How long the study drug effect lasts
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Clinical Trials Administrator
- Phone Number: 844-734-6643
- Email: clinicaltrials@regeneron.com
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01810
- Recruiting
- Andover Eye Associates
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Part A: adult participants aged 18 years and older. For part B: pediatric participants ≥8 years and <18 years, and adult participants aged 18 years and older.
- Positive SPT to cat allergen extract
- Positive specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) tests for cat and Fel d 1
- Positive CAC criteria
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant and/or severe environmental allergies causing symptoms (eg, ocular itching, ocular redness, etc) outside of the challenge setting that are expected to coincide or may interfere with study assessments
- Presence of any ophthalmic disease/ abnormality/ condition that may interfere with study assessments, affect the study outcomes or participant safety
- A clinical history of asthma with treatment of asthma requiring systemic (oral or parenteral) corticosteroid treatment as defined in the protocol
Note: Other Protocol Defined Inclusion/ Exclusion Criteria Apply
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: REGN-2Cat
Part A and B
|
Administered per the protocol
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Freneslerbart
Part A and B
|
Administered per the protocol
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Mevonlerbart
Part A
|
Administered per the protocol
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Matching placebo
Part A and B
|
Administered per the protocol
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Ocular itch score in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: At day 8, post-Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC)
|
At day 8, post-Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
1. Ocular itch score in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
2. Conjunctival redness score in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
3. Achievement of at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in ocular itch score for at least 2 out of 3 post-CAC time points in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
4. Achievement of at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in conjunctival redness score for at least 2 out of 3 post-CAC time points in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
5. Percent change from baseline in cat titrated Skin Prick Test (tSPT) in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85
|
Up to day 85
|
|
|
6. Ocular itch score in participants receiving freneslerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
7. Conjunctival redness score in participants receiving freneslerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
8. Achievement of at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in ocular itch score for at least 2 out of 3 post-CAC time points in participants receiving freneslerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
9. Achievement of at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in conjunctival redness score for at least 2 out of 3 post-CAC time points in participants receiving freneslerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
10. Percent change from baseline in cat tSPT in participants receiving freneslerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85
|
Up to day 85
|
|
|
11. Ocular itch score in participants receiving mevonlerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: At day 8, post-CAC
|
Part A
|
At day 8, post-CAC
|
|
12. Conjunctival redness score in participants receiving mevonlerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: At day 8, post-CAC
|
Part A
|
At day 8, post-CAC
|
|
13. Achievement of at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in ocular itch score for at least 2 out of 3 post-CAC time points in participants receiving mevonlerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: At day 8, post-CAC
|
Part A
|
At day 8, post-CAC
|
|
14. Achievement of at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in conjunctival redness score for at least 2 out of 3 post-CAC time points in participants receiving mevonlerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: At day 8, post-CAC
|
Part A
|
At day 8, post-CAC
|
|
15. Ocular itch score in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to mevonlerbart
Time Frame: At day 8, post-CAC
|
Part A
|
At day 8, post-CAC
|
|
16. Ocular itch score in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to freneslerbart
Time Frame: At day 8, post-CAC
|
At day 8, post-CAC
|
|
|
17. Achievements of different degrees of clinical response, as measured by change from baseline in ocular itch score among participants receiving REGN-2Cat, freneslerbart, mevonlerbart or placebo
Time Frame: At day 8, post-CAC
|
At day 8, post-CAC
|
|
|
18. Percent change from baseline in cat tSPT in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to freneslerbart
Time Frame: At day 8
|
At day 8
|
|
|
19. Percent change from baseline in cat tSPT in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to mevonlerbart
Time Frame: At day 8
|
Part A
|
At day 8
|
|
20. Ciliary redness score in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
21. Episcleral redness score in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
22. Total redness score in participants receiving REGN-2Cat as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
23. Ciliary redness score in participants receiving freneslerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
24. Episcleral redness score in participants receiving freneslerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
25. Total redness score in participants receiving freneslerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
Up to day 85, post-CAC
|
|
|
26. Percent change from baseline in cat tSPT in participants receiving mevonlerbart as compared to placebo
Time Frame: Up to day 85
|
Part A
|
Up to day 85
|
|
27. Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
|
|
28. Severity of TEAEs
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
|
|
29. Occurrence of Treatment Emergent-Serious Adverse Events (TE-SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
|
|
30. Concentrations of total freneslerbart in serum
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
|
|
31. Concentrations of total mevonlerbart in serum
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
|
|
32. Occurrence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to freneslerbart
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
|
|
33. Magnitude of ADA to freneslerbart
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
|
|
34. Occurrence of ADA to mevonlerbart
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
|
|
35. Magnitude of ADA to mevonlerbart
Time Frame: Up to day 113
|
Up to day 113
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Clinical Trial Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R1908-1909-ALG-2582
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
When Regeneron has:
- received marketing authorization from major health authorities (e.g., FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), etc.) for the product and indication or has globally discontinued development of the product for all indications on or after April 2020 and has no plans for future development
- made the study results publicly available (e.g., scientific publication, scientific conference, clinical trial registry)
- the legal authority to share the data, and
- ensured the ability to protect participant privacy
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.