Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Fatigue, Mood, and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis

June 29, 2026 updated by: Asdrubal Rene Huerta Gallango, Universidad de Almeria

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Fatigue, Mood, and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Crossover Trial

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, inflammatory and disabling disease of the Cnetral Nervous System characterized by relapsing and / or progressive somatosensory, motor and vestibular clinical manifestations. Moreover, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment are also present in most MS patients. These symptoms substantially impact quality of life and often show limited response to conventional pharmacological treatment.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique that applies a weak direct current to the scalp via surface electrodes, modulating cortical excitability in a polarity-dependent manner.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tDCS for fatigue, depression, anxiety, and cognitive performance in patients with relapsing or progressive MS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico, 11580
        • Neurociencia Clínica Integral

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-55 years at the time of enrollment
  • Clinical diagnosis of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) or Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PMS), with or without active progression, established per the 2014 McDonald diagnostic criteria
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-3 at the time of screening
  • Time since initial MS diagnosis of at least 6 months
  • Active fatigue symptoms reported by the participant for at least the 6 months prior to enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neuropsychiatric illness (including major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or any anxiety disorder) prior to the onset of multiple sclerosis
  • Diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (Devic's disease)
  • Presence of any other central nervous system disease
  • Disease duration greater than 10 years combined with an EDSS score of ≤ 2
  • Visual impairment secondary to optic neuritis, internuclear ophthalmoplegia (oculomotor disorder), or any other uncorrected visual impairment that would affect task performance on cognitive assessments
  • Current pharmacological treatment for fatigue or depression
  • Current neuropsychiatric pharmacological treatment, including any antidepressant, anxiolytic, neuroleptic, or anticonvulsant medication
  • Clinical relapse requiring corticosteroid treatment in the 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Severe upper-limb motor deficit that would prevent task performance on neuropsychological assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active, F3 anode, F4 cathode, 20 minutes, 4 mA, transcranial direct current stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique that applies a weak direct current to the scalp via surface electrodes, modulating cortical excitability in a polarity-dependent manner. tDCS has an established safety profile across the populations and protocols studied to date. This study uses an anodal stimulation montage of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).
Sham Comparator: Sham, F3 anode, F4 cathode, 20 minutes, 0 mA, transcranial direct current stimulation simulation
Sham Comparator: Sham, F3 anode, F4 cathode, 20 minutes, transcranial direct current stimulation simulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) - Total Score
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline (Day 0), immediately following the first 5-day stimulation block (Day 5), and immediately following the second 5-day stimulation block (Day 26 after washout)
The MFIS is a 21-item multidimensional self-report scale assessing the impact of fatigue on physical (9 items), cognitive (10 items), and psychosocial (2 items) functioning over the past 4 weeks. Each item is scored 0-4; total score ranges from 0 to 84. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue impact. The primary comparison is post-active-tDCS total score versus post-sham total score.
Assessed at baseline (Day 0), immediately following the first 5-day stimulation block (Day 5), and immediately following the second 5-day stimulation block (Day 26 after washout)
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) - Physical Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Physical subscale of the MFIS (9 items; range 0-36). Assesses impact of fatigue on physical functioning. Compared between active tDCS and sham conditions.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) - Cognitive Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Cognitive subscale of the MFIS (10 items; range 0-40). Assesses impact of fatigue on cognitive functioning. Compared between active tDCS and sham conditions.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) - Psychosocial Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Psychosocial subscale of the MFIS (2 items; range 0-8). Assesses impact of fatigue on psychosocial functioning. Compared between active tDCS and sham conditions.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
7-item subscale of the HADS assessing anxiety symptom severity. Each item is scored 0-3; subscale range 0-21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety. Compared between active tDCS and sham conditions.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
7-item subscale of the HADS assessing depression symptom severity. Each item is scored 0-3; subscale range 0-21. Higher scores indicate greater depression. Compared between active tDCS and sham conditions.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Participant-rated 0-10 point visual analog scale for subjective fatigue severity (0 = no fatigue, 10 = worst imaginable fatigue). Used as a brief supplementary measure alongside the MFIS.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Participant-rated 0-10 point visual analog scale for subjective depression severity (0 = no depression, 10 = worst imaginable depression). Used as a brief supplementary measure alongside the HADS.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Validated test of information-processing speed and working memory, part of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). The participant substitutes symbols for digits within 90 seconds; higher scores indicate better performance. Compared between active tDCS and sham conditions.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Standardized measure of short-term verbal learning and memory, part of the BICAMS battery. Assessed as total correct recall across learning trials; higher scores indicate better performance. Compared between active tDCS and sham conditions.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5, Day 26
Standardized measure of short-term visuospatial memory and learning, part of the BICAMS battery. Assessed as total correct recall across learning trials; higher scores indicate better performance. Compared between active tDCS and sham conditions.
Baseline, Day 5, Day 26

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events - frequency and type
Time Frame: After each of the 10 stimulation sessions (Days 1-5 and Days 22-26)
Adverse events assessed by structured interview after each stimulation session, including tingling, stinging, burning, headache, dizziness, numbness, forgetfulness, difficulty concentrating, blurred vision, muscle spasms, nausea, and difficulty breathing. Frequencies compared between active and sham conditions using McNemar's test.
After each of the 10 stimulation sessions (Days 1-5 and Days 22-26)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ASDRUBAL R HUERTA GALLANGO, MD / PhD, Universidad de Almeria
  • Principal Investigator: Luis Fernando Sánchez-Santed, PhD, Universidad de Almeria

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in the published article will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Shared data will include the de-identified clinical dataset (outcome scores at baseline, post-sham, and post-treatment time points for all 33 completers), the statistical analysis plan, and the data dictionary. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author (asdrubalhuerta@gmail.com) and will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Data will be shared after deposition of the dataset in an institutional or public repository upon publication of the primary manuscript.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting 3 months following publication of the primary manuscript; available for at least 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers with a methodologically sound research proposal and a signed data access agreement with the corresponding institution. Requests submitted to the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

3
Subscribe