Ozone Versus Conventional Socket Disinfection for Primary Dental Implant Stability

June 30, 2026 updated by: Zeliha Başak Çakır Erdil

Comparison of Ozone and Conventional Socket Disinfection in Dental Implant Placement in Terms of Primary Stability

This randomized split-mouth controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effects of ozone and conventional implant site disinfection on primary and early secondary implant stability. Systemically healthy adults requiring at least two dental implants in symmetrical or contralateral edentulous sites will receive ozone disinfection at one implant site and conventional disinfection at the paired site according to a randomized allocation. Implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement using insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (Implant Stability Quotient, ISQ), and secondary stability will be evaluated by ISQ measurements at the 3-month follow-up during healing abutment placement. The study will determine whether ozone disinfection improves implant stability during the early osseointegration period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary implant stability is a key determinant of successful osseointegration and long-term implant survival. Various implant site disinfection methods have been proposed to reduce the microbial load before implant placement. Ozone possesses antimicrobial and biostimulatory properties and may improve the biological environment for implant healing compared with conventional implant site disinfection.

The purpose of this randomized split-mouth controlled clinical trial is to compare ozone implant site disinfection with conventional implant site disinfection in terms of primary and early secondary implant stability.

Systemically healthy adults requiring at least two dental implants in symmetrical or contralateral edentulous sites will be enrolled. According to a randomized split-mouth design, one implant site will receive ozone disinfection before implant placement, whereas the paired implant site will receive conventional disinfection. This design allows each participant to serve as their own control, thereby minimizing inter-individual variability.

Primary implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement using insertion torque measurements and resonance frequency analysis (Implant Stability Quotient, ISQ). Secondary implant stability will be evaluated by resonance frequency analysis at the 3-month follow-up during healing abutment placement. All clinical procedures will be standardized and performed by experienced clinicians. The study aims to determine whether ozone implant site disinfection provides superior implant stability during the early osseointegration period compared with conventional implant site disinfection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merkez
      • Adıyaman, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye), 02030
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Adıyaman University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Systemically healthy individuals requiring at least two dental implants.
  • Presence of symmetrical or contralateral edentulous sites suitable for dental implant placement.
  • Adequate bone volume for implant placement without the need for simultaneous bone augmentation.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and comply with the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Systemically healthy individuals requiring at least two dental implants.
  • Presence of symmetrical or contralateral edentulous sites suitable for dental implant placement.
  • Adequate bone volume for implant placement without the need for simultaneous bone augmentation.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and comply with the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ozone Disinfection
Implant sites assigned to the experimental intervention receive ozone disinfection before dental implant placement.
Before dental implant placement, the implant site assigned to the experimental intervention is disinfected using ozone according to the study protocol. In this randomized split-mouth design, each participant receives ozone disinfection at one implant site, while the paired contralateral or symmetrical implant site receives conventional disinfection. Implant stability is evaluated immediately after implant placement using insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (ISQ), and again after 3 months using ISQ.
Experimental: Conventional Disinfection
Implant sites assigned to the control intervention receive conventional implant site disinfection before dental implant placement.
Before dental implant placement, the implant site assigned to the control intervention is disinfected using the conventional disinfection protocol. In this randomized split-mouth design, each participant receives conventional disinfection at one implant site, while the paired contralateral or symmetrical implant site receives ozone disinfection. Implant stability is evaluated immediately after implant placement using insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (ISQ), and again after 3 months using ISQ.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Implant Stability (Insertion Torque)
Time Frame: Immediately after implant placement
Primary implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement by measuring insertion torque (Ncm).
Immediately after implant placement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because of participant confidentiality and institutional data-sharing policies.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant Placement

Clinical Trials on Ozone Implant Site Disinfection

3
Subscribe