- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03250949
Clinical Evaluation Of Dental Implants Stability Placed In Healed Bony Sites Following Over-drilling Compared To Conventional-Drilling Protocol (RCT)
Clinical Evaluation Of Dental Implants Stability Placed In Healed Bony Sites Following Over-drilling Compared To Conventional-Drilling Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- Statement of the problem:
peri-implant bone is affected by excessive mechanical stress, the mechanism of bone formation is reduced and the bone resorption is increased, leading to MBL. Isidor F. 2006, Warreth A, 009 A drilling sequence using a drill that is smaller than the implant diameter has been applied as a way to obtain enough initial stability.Bilhan H,2010 However, the implant can be extremely compressed or exceed the torque, which can be higher than the elastic limit of bone when a drill that is smaller than the implant diameter is used. This may affect the bone surrounding the implant and may also lead to a micro fracture.
Frost mentioned that alveolar bone density is changed by micro deformation due to modification of the physical condition. Bone resorption and fibrous tissue production progress if the micro deformation rate is higher than 3,000 micro strain (με). Also, continuous bone replacement occurs while woven bone appears. Wolff J.1986 Bone tissue adapts to the change of stress while minimizing its weight and transforming its structure. Frost HM,1989 The bone formation mechanism is inhibited and the bone resorption mechanism is enhanced if excessive mechanical stress is applied to alveolar bone during implantation, resulting in the progression of marginal bone loss (MBL). Isidor F.2006 , Warreth A,2009-
Rationale for carrying out the trial:
Success and survival rate of an implant are directly associated with primary stability. Friberg B,et al 1991 Primary stability is achieved with initial rigid fixation of implants during the surgery and considered necessary for a successful osseointegration. Sennerby L,et al 1992, Rodrigo D,et al 2010 There are two different processes of bone formation at implant sites; contact and distance osteogenesis. Contact osteogenesis infers new bone formation in direct contact with the implant surface. Distance osteogenesis is the new bone formation on the surfaces of the parent bone and occurs when primary stability is absent at implant site. Davies JE.et al 2003, Sivolella S,et al2012
When there is a gap between the implant surface and bone, a clot will fill the space and will be replaced by a provisional connective matrix that will act as scaffold for formation of woven bone. Berglundh T,et al,2003 , Rossi F,2012 Our study will evaluate the effect of oversized drilling on implant success and secondary stability
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have at least one missing tooth in the upper maxillary arch.
- Patients with healthy systemic condition.(Brightman. 1994)
- Patients aged from 20 to 60 years old.
- Good oral hygiene.(Wiesner et al. 2010)
- Accepts 9 months follow-up period (cooperative patients)
- Patient provides an informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest.
- Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits (Lobbezoo et al. 2006).
- Current and former smokers (Lambert, Morris, and Ochi 2000)
- Pregnant women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Conventional-Drilling Tight Fit (Control) group
osteotomy will be achieved with no.
6 round , then widened , using a drill 1 mm larger than the final drill provided by the manufacturer.
the final size of the control osteotomies were same diameter of the implant.
|
|
Experimental: Over-drilling Loose Fit (Test) group
Osteotomy preparations for the loose fit group will be identical to those of the tight fit group until final drill, which will be 0.2mm wider than the diameter of the implant.
|
Osteotomy preparations for the loose fit group will be identical to those of the tight fit group until final drill, which will be 0.2mm wider than the diameter of the implant. osteotomy site of the implant is wider by 0.2mm than the implant diameter
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
implant stability
Time Frame: first 3 months
|
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) OSSTELL (Osstell Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) (Osstell
|
first 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Crestal bone level
Time Frame: from 3 to 6 month
|
by Digital radiography
|
from 3 to 6 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Randomized controlled trial
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Crestal Bone Resorption
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownCrestal Bone LossEgypt
-
Søren JepsenCompletedInfluence of Platform-switching on Bone Level Alterations: a 3 Year Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT).Periimplant Crestal Bone Level Changes
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted"Bony Changes Around Dental Implant in Free Fibular Graft Versus Non-Vascularized Iliac Crest Graft"Survival Rate | Crestal Bone LossEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingImmediate Implant | Autogenous Tooth Graft | Estetic Zone | Autogenous Bone Graft | Jumping Gap | Crestal Bone LevelEgypt
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterUnknownPreserve Crestal Bone Level and Gingival Margin Around Dental ImplantsIsrael
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...RecruitingAlveolar Bone ResorptionChina
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiUniversity Paul Sabatier of ToulouseRecruiting
-
Nourhan M.AlyAlexandria UniversityCompletedMandibular Bone ResorptionEgypt
-
Marmara UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on implant site over drilling protocol
-
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & HospitalCompletedBone Density | Implant StabilityIndia
-
Mohammed RamadanNot yet recruitingSingle Tooth Lost | Partially Edentulous MaxillaEgypt
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Active, not recruitingDental ImplantsUnited States
-
International Piezosurgery AcademyCompleted
-
Indiana UniversitySnoasis Medical ProductsCompletedPathological Conditions, Anatomical | Alveolar Bone Loss
-
International Piezosurgery AcademyUniversity of Trieste; University of FoggiaCompleted
-
Erzincan UniversityMode Medical Implant ManufacturerNot yet recruitingDifferent Surgical Techniques in Dental Implant Surgery
-
Edith MarkAalborg University HospitalUnknown
-
Luigi CanulloRecruitingTooth Loss | Edentulous Alveolar Ridge | Missing TeethItaly