- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07701031
Assessing EUS and Percutaneous Untargeted Liver Biopsy Quality: A Sequential-Period Cluster-Randomized Study (EUS-PERC)
July 8, 2026 updated by: Prof. Dr. Michael Praktiknjo, University Hospital Muenster
This prospective, single-center study evaluates and compares the tissue sample quality and patient comfort of different liver biopsy methods.
While traditional percutaneous liver biopsy passes a needle through the abdominal wall into the liver, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) offers an internal alternative performed via the stomach under sedation.
However, the optimal EUS needle size and tip design remain unclear.
Therefore, this trial directly compares the diagnostic tissue yield and patient-reported pain across four contemporary EUS needle strategies and the traditional percutaneous approach.
The study utilizes a sequential-period cluster-randomized design, enrolling consecutive adult patients who require a clinically indicated, untargeted liver biopsy over five predefined, sequential eight-week periods.
Each eight-week block serves as a cluster, during which all enrolled patients receive the specific biopsy needle assigned to that period.
The trial begins with the standard percutaneous 18G TruCut needle cluster.
To minimize bias, the sequence of the subsequent four EUS-guided needle clusters-consisting of 19G FNA, 19G FNB, 22G FNA, and 22G FNB needles-is determined beforehand using a computer-generated random sequence.
All procedures are performed by the same clinical team using highly standardized techniques to compare total specimen length, complete portal tracts, and procedure-associated pain across all groups.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
146
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Münster, Germany, 48149
- University Hospital Muenster
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
All consecutive adult patients undergoing clinically indicated untargeted liver biopsy during the study period at our tertiary liver center.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- clinical indication for non-targeted liver biopsy
- written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- ascites
- severe coagulopathy (INR >2.0 or platelet count <50 × 10³/µl)
- contraindications to endoscopy or sedation
- anatomical conditions precluding safe liver biopsy
- pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Percutaneous Liver Biopsy 18G Trucut
|
Percutaneous Liver biopsy 18G Trucut
|
|
EUS-LB 19G FNA
|
Liver biopsy performed with 19G FNA
|
|
EUS-LB 19G FNB
|
Liver biopsy performed with 19G FNB
|
|
EUS-LB 22G FNA
|
Liver biopsy performed with 22G FNA
|
|
EUS-LB 22G FNB
|
Liver biopsy performed with 22G FNB
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Biopsy specimen length and complete portal tracts
Time Frame: From enrollment within one week
|
From enrollment within one week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall adequacy
Time Frame: 7 days (until pathologic examination finished)
|
CPT count ≥ 11 or Specimen length ≥ 15 mm
|
7 days (until pathologic examination finished)
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Bleeding and pain
|
72 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009 Mar;49(3):1017-44. doi: 10.1002/hep.22742. No abstract available.
- Mok SRS, Diehl DL, Johal AS, Khara HS, Confer BD, Mudireddy PR, Kovach AH, Diehl MM, Kirchner HL, Chen ZE. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in chronic liver disease: a randomized comparison of 19-G FNA and 22-G FNB needles. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Jan;7(1):E62-E71. doi: 10.1055/a-0655-7462. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
- Bang JY, Ward TJ, Guirguis S, Krall K, Contreras F, Jhala N, Navaneethan U, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S. Radiology-guided percutaneous approach is superior to EUS for performing liver biopsies. Gut. 2021 Dec;70(12):2224-2226. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324495. Epub 2021 Mar 25. No abstract available.
- Facciorusso A, Crino SF, Ramai D, Fabbri C, Mangiavillano B, Lisotti A, Muscatiello N, Cotsoglou C, Fusaroli P. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in comparison to percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan;16(1):51-57. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2020645. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
- Chandan S, Deliwala S, Khan SR, Mohan BP, Dhindsa BS, Bapaye J, Goyal H, Kassab LL, Kamal F, Sayles HR, Kochhar GS, Adler DG. EUS-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Endosc Ultrasound. 2023 Mar-Apr;12(2):171-180. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00268.
- Ching-Companioni RA, Diehl DL, Johal AS, Confer BD, Khara HS. 19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2019 Nov;51(11):1059-1065. doi: 10.1055/a-0956-6922. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
- Ali AH, Nallapeta NS, Yousaf MN, Petroski GF, Sharma N, Rao DS, Yin F, Davis RM, Bhat A, Swi AIA, Al-Juboori A, Ibdah JA, Hammoud GM. EUS-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Endosc Ultrasound. 2023 May-Jun;12(3):334-341. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000010. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
- Diehl DL, Sangwan V, Johal AS, Khara HS, Confer B. Comparing a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle with a 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jun;99(6):931-937. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.022. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
- Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H, Davies S, Hebditch V, Hollywood C, Hubscher S, Karkhanis S, Lester W, Roslund N, West R, Wyatt JI, Heydtmann M. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology. Gut. 2020 Aug;69(8):1382-1403. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321299. Epub 2020 May 28.
- Hajifathalian K, Westerveld D, Kaplan A, Dawod E, Herr A, Ianelli M, Saggese A, Kumar S, Fortune BE, Sharaiha RZ. Simultaneous EUS-guided portosystemic pressure measurement and liver biopsy sampling correlate with clinically meaningful outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Apr;95(4):703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.037. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
November 15, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 8, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
July 14, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 14, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 8, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MSLB2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Liver Cirrhosis
-
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and...Society for the Study of Liver Diseases, Chandigarh ( India )UnknownDecompensated Cirrhosis of LiverIndia
-
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical...RecruitingFibrosis, Liver | Cirrhosis, LiverChina
-
SUUMC Central Military Hospital Dr Carol DavilaRecruiting
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCirrhosis, LiverUnited States
-
Anhui Provincial HospitalEnrolling by invitationCirrhosis LiverChina
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterAmerican Association for the Study of Liver Diseases FoundationCompleted
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaCompletedCirrhosis, LiverIndia
-
Sherief Abd-ElsalamUnknown
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...Spanish Clinical Research Network - SCReNWithdrawn
-
Changi General HospitalRecruiting