GCSF Therapy in Decompensated Cirrhosis - A Double Blinded RCT

July 17, 2019 updated by: Dr.Virendra Singh, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Therapy In Decompensated Cirrhosis Of Liver: A Double Blinded Single Centre Randomised Controlled Trial

Cirrhosis of liver is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Complications like ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) portend a poor prognosis and further decreases survival in these patients. The major causes of cirrhosis include excessive alcohol consumption, viral hepatitis and non- alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Currently the only definitive treatment option for cirrhosis is liver transplantation which is limited in its applicability due to donor shortage, exorbitant costs and lack of widespread availability. Moreover, it requires lifelong immunosuppression and has considerable long term side effects including chronic renal failure, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and cardiovascular complications.

The ability of stem cells to differentiate into multiple cellular lineages makes one speculate that stem cells can be used for tissue repair and regeneration when tissue-resident stem cells become overwhelmed. It has been shown that in response to acute or chronic liver damage, bone marrow derived stem cells can spontaneously populate the liver and differentiate into hepatic cells, thereby contributing to hepatic regeneration. Thus, apart from hepatocytes and intrahepatic stem cells, bone marrow derived stem cells also participate in the liver regeneration process.

Currently, there are two methods to mobilize stem cells from the bone marrow to the liver. One is administration of cytokines like granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the other is the isolation of stem cells from the marrow and their injection into the hepatic artery or portal vein after purification. The latter is probably more cumbersome and may be potentially risky due to the underlying coagulation abnormalities in cirrhotic patients. Improved liver histology and survival has been noted in patients with cirrhosis following mobilization of bone marrow stem cells by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF).

Three recent studies have demonstrated G-CSF induced mobilization of bone marrow stem cells (CD34 cells) in peripheral blood and their subsequent increase in liver tissue and improved survival in patients with alcoholic hepatitis and ACLF. However, there is a paucity of data on whether G-CSF improves survival and prognosis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Verma, Singh et al have shown in an open label trial that there was significantly better 12 month transplant free survival in ( GCSF+ Growth hormone + standard medical therapy group ) and ( G CSF + standard medical therapy group ) as compared to standard medical therapy group alone. CD 34+ cells at day 6 of therapy increased as compared to baseline. There was also a significant decrease of clinical scores, improvement in nutrition, better control of ascites, reduction in liver stiffness, lesser episodes of infection as well as improvement in QOL scores in the treatment groups having G CSF as compared to baseline.

In a recent study by Newsome et al, a multicentre, open label randomized phase 2 trial, patients were randomized to standard care, treatment with subcutaneous G CSF or treatment with G CSF for 5 days followed by leukaphersis and IV infusion of CD 133 positive haematopoietic stem cells. They did not find any difference in MELD score over time in all 3 treatment groups. Serious adverse effects were more common in the G CSF groups than in standard treatment group.

In a study by Kedarisetty CK et al. a significantly larger proportion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis given a combination of G-CSF & Darbopoietin α survived for 12 months more than patients given only placebo ( 68% vs. 26.9%; P = 0.001 ). The combination therapy also reduced liver severity scores and sepsis to a greater extent than placebo.

In view of the conflicting results of the above studies and no studies on the use of multiple courses of GCSF in patients with decompensated cirrhosis in a double blind manner, the present study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of G-CSF in patients with decompensated cirrhosis in the form of a double blinded RCT.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Aswath Venkitaraman, MD
  • Phone Number: 9597517036
  • Email: av3280@gmail.com

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Recruiting
        • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Decompensated Cirrhosis of liver irrespective of etiology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute on chronic liver failure (fulfilling either APASL or CANONIC criteria of ACLF)
  • Splenic diameter of more than 18 cm
  • Concomitant HCC or other active malignancy
  • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the previous 7 days
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • Severe renal dysfunction as defined by creatnine > 1.5mg/dl
  • Severe cardiac dysfunction
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 9) or diabetic retinopathy
  • Acute infection or disseminate intravascular coagulation
  • Active alcohol abuse in last 3 months
  • Known hypersensitivity to G-CSF
  • HIV co-infection
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal to give informed consent
  • Those opting for liver transplant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Medical Therapy + G CSF Therapy
Standard medical therapy will include nutritional support, rifaximin, lactulose, bowel wash, albumin, diuretics, multivitamins, antibiotics. fresh frozen plasma and packed red-cell transfusions (as required). G-CSF ( prefilled syringe) at the dosage of 5 μg/Kg subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered.
G-CSF will be administered as prefilled syringes at a dosage of 5 μg/Kg subcutaneously every 12 hr for five consecutive days. Four such cycles will be administered at three monthly intervals.
Placebo Comparator: Standard Medical Therapy + Placebo

Standard medical therapy will include nutritional support, rifaximin, lactulose, bowel wash, albumin, diuretics, multivitamins, antibiotics. fresh frozen plasma and packed red-cell transfusions (as required).

Placebo ( prefilled syringe) filled with normal saline subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered.

Placebo ( prefilled syringe) filled with normal saline subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: One year
Overall Survival at 1 year from the onset of therapy
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemopoietic stem cell mobilisation
Time Frame: One Year
Mobilisation of CD 34+ cells in peripheral blood
One Year
Clinical improvement in liver functions
Time Frame: One Year
Occurrence of decompensations namely ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and variceal bleed
One Year
Biochemical improvement in liver functions
Time Frame: One Year
Improvement in model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. MELD score includes serum bilirubin, serum creatinine and international normalized ratio (INR). The score ranges from 6 to 40 with higher score indicating more severe liver disease.
One Year
Improvement in nutritional status
Time Frame: One Year
Nutritional status will be assessed by skeletal muscle index (SMI) measurement using CT scan measurements at L3 level
One Year
Improvement in quality of life
Time Frame: One year
Quality of life will be assessed using SF-36V2 Health Survey questionnaire
One year
Depression
Time Frame: One year
Improvement in Depression as assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The questionnaire score ranges from 1 to 27 with 1 indicating minimal depression and 27 indicating severe depression.
One year
Demoralisation scale
Time Frame: One year
Change in demoralisation scale will be noted at baseline and at the end of one year. The demoralisation scale is a questionnaire comprising of 24 items each being scored from 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 to 96 with higher score indicating more severe demoralisation.
One year
Immunological profile
Time Frame: One year
Change in the immunological profile of patients. Immunological profile will be assessed using various interleukins (IL) including IL-6, IL-10, TNF-alpha, IL-17, IL-4, IL-13 and IFN-gamma which will be measured in pg/ml at baseline and at the end of one year.
One year
Safety of G-CSF as assessed by its adverse effects
Time Frame: One year
Safety of G-CSF as assessed by its adverse effects
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GCSF in DC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decompensated Cirrhosis of Liver

Clinical Trials on G-CSF

3
Subscribe