Safety and Efficacy of a STOPping Strategy Versus Classical Maintenance Dose of JAK Inhibitors in Deep Remission Patients With Ulcerative Colitis (STOP)

Safety and Efficacy of a STOPping Strategy Versus Classical Maintenance Dose of JAK Inhibitors in Deep Remission Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This phase IV, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether a JAK inhibitor discontinuation strategy is superior to standard maintenance therapy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis who are in sustained deep remission. A total of 224 patients treated with tofacitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib will be randomized to either treatment withdrawal or continuation of maintenance therapy and followed for 104 weeks. The primary objective is to compare safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction at Week 52, while secondary objectives include assessment of remission maintenance, quality of life, treatment exposure, endoscopic outcomes, and relapse rates

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background:

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are effective oral therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Their lack of immunogenicity provides a unique opportunity to evaluate treatment withdrawal and intermittent treatment strategies. However, safety concerns raised by regulatory agencies, including increased risks of infections, venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, and malignancies, support the investigation of strategies aiming to reduce long-term exposure to JAK inhibitors while maintaining disease control.

Objective:

To demonstrate the superiority of a JAK inhibitor stopping strategy compared with standard maintenance therapy in terms of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction in adults with ulcerative colitis in deep remission.

Study Design:

This is a phase IV, prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult patients with ulcerative colitis receiving a stable dose of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib for at least 12 months and achieving sustained steroid-free clinical, biological, and endoscopic remission for at least 6 months will be randomized to either treatment discontinuation or continuation of standard maintenance therapy. A total of 224 participants will be enrolled and followed for 104 weeks.

Primary Endpoint:

The primary endpoint is a composite outcome assessing treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks after randomization. Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM 1.4).

Secondary Endpoints:

Secondary outcomes include adverse events and serious adverse events, maintenance of remission, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, JAK inhibitor exposure, endoscopic outcomes, relapse rates, treatment success at Weeks 52 and 104, and identification of predictors of successful treatment discontinuation.

Expected Benefits:

Reducing exposure to JAK inhibitors may improve the overall safety profile by decreasing treatment-related adverse events while reducing treatment burden for patients with ulcerative colitis. This strategy could support a more individualized and potentially safer long-term management approach for patients in sustained deep remission.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

224

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France
        • CHU Amiens-Picardie
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mathurin FUMERY
        • Contact:
      • Avignon, France
        • Centre Hospitalier d'Avignon
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alban BENEZECH
      • Besançon, France
        • CHRU Besançon
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lucine VUITTON
        • Contact:
      • Bordeaux, France
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
      • Lille, France
        • Chu Lille
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maria NACHURY
        • Contact:
      • Lyon, France
        • HCL
      • Marseille, France
        • AP-HM hopital Nord
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lucas GUILLO
        • Contact:
      • Montpellier, France
        • CHU Montpellier
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Romain ALTWEGG
        • Contact:
      • Nancy, France
        • CHRU Nancy
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Benedicte CARON
        • Contact:
      • Nantes, France
      • Nice, France
        • CHU Nice
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adrien NICOLAU
        • Contact:
      • Nîmes, France
        • CHU Nîmes
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ludovic CAILLO
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Bicêtre
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Aurélien AMIOT
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Beaujon
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexandre NUZZO
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Henri-Mondor
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mathieu UZZAN
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France
      • Rennes, France
      • Rouen, France
        • Chu Rouen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nicolas RICHARD
        • Contact:
      • Saint-Etienne, France
      • Toulon, France
      • Toulouse, France
        • CHU Toulouse
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cyrielle GILETTA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of UC from at least 6 months according to clinical, endoscopic, histological and/or radiological criteria.
  2. Male or female age ≥ 18 years
  3. Currently treated by JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib, upadacitinib or filgotinib) for more than 12 months.
  4. Currently at a stable dose of tofacitinib (5mg or 10mg twice a day), upadacitinib (15mg or 30mg per day) or filgotinib (200mg per day) for 6 months.
  5. Clinical steroid free remission for at least 6 months, defined by a partial Mayo Score < 2, with no subscore > 1 and rectal bleeding (RB) subscore of 0 (annex 1).
  6. Endoscopic steroid free remission for at inclusion, defined by a Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (annex 1).
  7. Fecal calprotectin ≤ 150μg/g.
  8. Without known risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE).
  9. Without known risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
  10. Without known risk factors for malignancy.
  11. For women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP), and for men with partners who are WOCBP, willingness to use appropriate and efficient contraception, as recommended when using JAK inhibitor treatment (notably upadacitinib), during all the experimental treatment and until at least 4 weeks after the end of the experimental treatment, according to SmPC and CTFG (Clinical Trials Facilitation and Coordination Group) recommendations.
  12. Patients able to understand information provide to them and to give written informed consent for study.
  13. Affiliation to a social security scheme.
  14. Good general health according to history and clinical examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Steroid use ≤ 6 months prior to enrolment.
  2. Currently treated by steroid, immunosuppressive agents or biologics.
  3. Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study.
  4. Breastfeeding.
  5. Non-compliant subject or inability to follow study protocol.
  6. Intolerance of JAK inhibitors (excipients included) or severe adverse event.
  7. Contraindications to using a JAK inhibitor (excipients included).
  8. Known risk factors for VTE.
  9. Known risk factors for MACE.
  10. Active neoplasia or history of malignant tumours less than 5 years old.
  11. Participation to another interventional study protocol (except for RIPH3 studies)
  12. Severe hepatic insufficiency.
  13. Severe to end-stage renal insufficiency.
  14. Active tuberculosis, serious infections such as septicemia or opportunistic infections.
  15. Absence or refusal of informed consent.
  16. People under guardianship, conservatorship, or judicial protection;
  17. People receiving psychiatric care;
  18. People who have been deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative order
  19. People with difficulty understanding and/or cognitive disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: standard of care
Experimental: STOP, treatment withdrawal
the patients will stop their treatment, as long as possible until symptom reappearance, if any

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Time Frame: 1 year
treatment safety, during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
1 year
The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Time Frame: 1 year
treatment efficacy, during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
1 year
The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Time Frame: 1 year
patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety: occurrence of herpes zoster, infection, cardiovascular event, biochemical parameter, malignancies, adverse event leading to discontinuation, and all adverse events (serious or not) during the whole follow-up.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Remission rate at the end the first 52 weeks of the follow-up
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Assess the treatment success of this innovative therapeutic strategy at the end of the first 52 weeks of the follow-up and after 104 weeks of follow-up.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Partial Mayo score at each visit of the entire follow-up
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Number of days under treatment and cumulative dose of treatment per patient between randomization and primary endpoint
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Number of days under induction dose of JAK inhibitor at the end the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Mayo endoscopic subscore at week 52 and week 104
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Proportion of patients relapsing for each arm
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucas GUILLO, DR, AP-HM

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis in Remission

Clinical Trials on treatment withdrawal

3
Subscribe