Developing Pilot Postoperative Guidelines for Improved Functional Outcomes After High-Risk Cancer Surgery

August 24, 2026 updated by: Kimberly Kopecky, MD, MSCI, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Development and Implementation of Pilot Postoperative Guidelines to Improve Functional Outcomes Following High-Risk Surgery for Cancer: A North American Prospective Feasibility Study

The objective of this study is to develop and evaluate the implementation of novel timeline-specific National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-style clinical guidelines designed to improve functional outcomes after high-risk abdominal surgery for cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, feasibility, and effectiveness trial to be conducted at The University of Alabama at Birmingham. We plan to develop algorithmic guidelines focused on proactive support of surgical recovery and will then recruit surgeons who care for adults undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery for cancer to study the preliminary effectiveness of implementing the algorithmic guidelines into postoperative care workflows at 4 pre-determined timepoints. A modified Delphi process will be used to ensure an expert consensus on the algorithmic guideline content is achieved through a rigorous and consensus-driven process. Two rounds of structured online voting will be conducted to rate and refine each algorithmic guideline component.

Key feasibility outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, surgeon adherence, data completeness, and integration into routine workflows. Preliminary effectiveness will be measured using patient-reported outcomes, timeliness of referral to supportive providers and resources, use of supportive services, rates of surgical regret, and measures of functional recovery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Amber N Taylor (Clinical Research Regulatory Coordinator I), BS, MA
  • Phone Number: (205)996-4611
  • Email: amberntaylor@uabmc.edu

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgeons who perform abdominal surgery for cancer at the study institution

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgeons who do not perform abdominal surgery for cancer
  • Surgeons who are external to the study institution

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Surgeons
Surgeons will be given a postoperative decision support guideline for assessment of functional recovery
This is a pilot feasibility study to test the clinical use of a novel algorithmic guideline to support patient functional recovery following cancer surgery. To date, no algorithmic guideline exists to support functional recovery as a primary postoperative outcome.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Surgeon Utilization of the Algorithmic Guidelines for Functional Recovery following Cancer Surgery
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary outcome is surgeon use of the novel guideline to guide the postoperative clinical care of patients recovering from GI cancer surgery. This will be measured by in-clinic fidelity monitoring, i.e. researcher monitoring of clinical use of the developed guideline.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kimberly E Kopecky, MD,MSCI, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-300016448
  • UAB (Other Identifier: UAB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Patient data is HIPAA.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe