Evaluation of the Aulea Veloxion™ Disposable Resectoscope System for Operational Efficiency in Surgical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

July 22, 2026 updated by: Alex Qinyang Liu, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Prospective, Single-Site, Single-Arm Evaluation of the Aulea Veloxion™ Disposable Resectoscope System for Operational Efficiency in Surgical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Prospective, single-arm, single-site, post-market device study; all procedures use Veloxion™ per IFU.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is to prospectively evaluate the operational efficiency and safety of the Veloxion™ disposable resectoscope system when used for endoscopic surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Subjects will be followed up on 2 weeks (phone/clinic) and 1 month, (phone/clinic, safety assessments, device-related AEs, reinterventions, usability feedback).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 30-70 years old with symptomatic BPH.
  • Prostate volume 20-120 mL (TRUS/MRI/US)
  • Suitable for endoscopic resection/vaporization per device IFU.
  • Able to consent and comply with follow-up to 1 month.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known/suspected prostate cancer requiring oncologic management.
  • Prior prostate surgery impacting urethral anatomy within 12 months.
  • Prior implant affecting urethral anatomy.
  • Active UTI or untreated bacteriuria pre-op.
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy; inability to manage antithrombotics.
  • Severe medical comorbidity precluding anesthesia or endoscopy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Aulea Veloxion™ Disposable Resectoscope System
TURP will be performed by Aulea Veloxion™ Disposable Resectoscope System. The resectoscopes are single-use and ensure consistent quality and no cross-contamination. The automated fluid management system continuously monitors and manages intravesical pressure while actively evacuating tissue to prevent clogging. The active power generation system optimize plasma generation for effective resection and extended equipment life. This system allows transurethral resection of prostate to be performed in a motorized and highly effective manner. This study is designed to prospectively characterize operational efficiency in real-world BPH resections using the cleared device platform.
Veloxion™ platform disposable resectoscope is FDA-cleared for treatment of BPH. It is an all-in-one, platform that combines fluid control, video pipeline and energy generator. The resectoscopes are single-use and ensure consistent quality and no cross-contamination. The automated fluid management system continuously monitors and manages intravesical pressure while actively evacuating tissue to prevent clogging. The active power generation system optimize plasma generation for effective resection and extended equipment life. This system allows transurethral resection of prostate to be performed in a motorized and highly effective manner. This study is designed to prospectively characterize operational efficiency in real-world BPH resections using the cleared device platform.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in total procedure time versus a pre-specified benchmark
Time Frame: Perioperative
Derived from historical standard reusable resectoscope TURP/TURP-like procedures at the same site, tested against a superiority margin
Perioperative
Difference in case cost versus a pre-specified benchmark
Time Frame: Perioperative
Derived from historical standard reusable resectoscope TURP/TURP-like procedures at the same site, tested against a superiority margin
Perioperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Resection time
Time Frame: Intra-operative
The cumulative electrosurgery activation time (minutes) from generator logs and video annotation.
Intra-operative
The Instrument exchanges time
Time Frame: Intra-operative
The count and cumulative time with scope out-of-field; standardized categories (loop, electrode, sheath, camera).
Intra-operative
The Visibility score
Time Frame: Intra-operative
Assessed by the surgeon-rated 5-point Likert per 15-minute epoch; total irrigation volume; number of bag exchanges; "red-out" events.
Intra-operative
Adverse event
Time Frame: Within post-operative 30 days
By "Clavien-Dindo Classification"
Within post-operative 30 days
The cost per case
Time Frame: Intra-operative
equipment, facility, consumables, device, reprocessing, repair, maintenance, rental (if applicable), staff cost to perform the surgery
Intra-operative
Staff usability scores
Time Frame: Intra-operative
By OR nurse and scrub tech 5-point Likert for setup ease, troubleshooting, case flow.
Intra-operative
Total procedure time
Time Frame: intra-operative
The time from scope insertion to final scope removal (minutes) from OR time logs/video time stamps.
intra-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Qinyang LIU, MBBS, MSc, FRCSEd, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)

Clinical Trials on TURP using the Aulea Veloxion™ Disposable Resectoscope System

Subscribe