Impact of Linked Color Imaging on Sessile Serrated Lesion Miss Rate

Impact of Linked Color Imaging on Sessile Serrated Lesion Miss Rate: a Multicenter Tandem Rondomized Controlled Trial

This prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate whether linked color imaging (LCI) could reduce the miss rate of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) during tandem colonoscopy compared with conventional white-light imaging (WLI).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2072

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects aged ≥45 years, regardless of gender;
  2. Subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy;
  3. Subjects with no prior colonoscopy;
  4. Voluntarily provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects unable to cooperate with or tolerate colonoscopy;
  2. Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease;
  3. Known or highly suspected colorectal obstruction;
  4. History of colorectal surgery;
  5. Chronic recurrent constipation;
  6. Failure to discontinue anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents for at least 1 week before the procedure;
  7. Poor bowel preparation with an inadequate Aronchick scale score during colonoscopy;
  8. Failed cecal intubation;
  9. High-risk conditions including severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, uncorrected severe anemia or active infection;
  10. Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  11. Subjects deemed ineligible for participation in this trial at the investigator's discretion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: WLI Then LCI Withdrawal Group
Tandem colonoscopy of the entire colorectum was performed, with initial observation using conventional white-light imaging, followed by linked color imaging.
Patients in the WLI then LCI withdrawal group first underwent careful endoscopic inspection with white-light imaging (WLI). The endoscopic setting was then switched to linked color imaging (LCI) for the second withdrawal. All polyps detected during both inspection passes were resected, and the number of lesions missed on the first withdrawal was subsequently calculated.
Active Comparator: LCI Then WLI Withdrawal Group
Tandem colonoscopy of the entire colorectum was performed, with initial observation using linked color imaging, followed by conventional white-light imaging.
Patients in the LCI then WLI withdrawal group first underwent careful endoscopic inspection with linked color imaging (LCI). The endoscopic setting was then switched to white-light imaging (WLI) for the second withdrawal. All polyps detected during both inspection passes were resected, and the number of lesions missed on the first withdrawal was subsequently calculated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sessile serrated lesions miss rate(SSLMR)
Time Frame: One day
The number of SSL detected in the second-pass examination/total number of SSL detected in both two pass.
One day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
adenoma miss rate (AMR)
Time Frame: One day
The number of adenomas detected in the second-pass examination/total number of adenomas detected in the two pass.
One day
advanced adenomas miss rate (AAMR)
Time Frame: One day
the number of advanced adenomas detected in the second-pass examination/total number of advanced adenomas detected in the two pass.
One day
polyps miss rate (PMR)
Time Frame: One day
the number of polyps detected in the second-pass examination/total number of polyps detected in the two pass.
One day
sessile serrated lesions detection rate (SSLDR)
Time Frame: One day
the number of patients with at least one sessile serrated lesion detected by linked color imaging or white light imaging, divided by the total number of patients.
One day
adenomas detection rate (ADR)
Time Frame: One day
the number of patients with at least one adenoma detected by linked color imaging or white light imaging, divided by the total number of patients.
One day
advanced adenomas detection rate (AADR)
Time Frame: One day
the number of patients with at least one advanced adenoma detected by linked color imaging or white light imaging, divided by the total number of patients.
One day
polyps detection rate (PDR)
Time Frame: One day
the number of patients with at least one polyp detected by linked color imaging or white light imaging, divided by the total number of patients.
One day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NFEC-2026-304

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe