- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07762651
Clinical Evaluation of Dentin Replacement Materials in Posterior Composite Restorations
August 8, 2026 updated by: Mohammed Abd El Ghany Mohammed, Tanta University
This randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to clinically evaluate and compare the performance of five dentin replacement materials used beneath posterior composite restorations.
Study Overview
Status
Enrolling by invitation
Conditions
Detailed Description
Thirty patients ranging in age from 20 to 35 years will be enrolled into the study.
This study will be designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial including patients requiring six Class I restorations.
Participants will be randomly allocated into six groups according to the type of dentin replacement material used: Group I (Biodentin), Group II (Activa Bioactive), Group III (Glass ionomer cement), Group IV (Ever x posterior), and Group V (Flowable resin).
Restorations will be placed following standardized cavity preparation and manufacturer instructions.
Clinical evaluation will be performed at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 months using modified FDI criteria, assessing retention, marginal integrity, surface roughness, anatomical form, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries.
Data will be collected and statistically analyzed
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Tanta
-
Tanta, Tanta, Egypt, 31527
- faculty of dentistry, Tanta university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are medically able to undergo routine dental restorative treatment.
- Patients willing and able to provide written informed consent.
- Patients with adequate oral hygiene and periodontal health for participation in the study.
- Patients requiring posterior Class I restorations
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with systemic conditions that contraindicate routine dental treatment.
- Patients unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
- Patients with poor compliance or inability to attend scheduled follow-up visits.
- Teeth with clinical or radiographic evidence of irreversible pulpitis, pulp necrosis, or periapical pathology.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Biodentine
Participants will receive posterior Class I composite restorations incorporating Biodentine as the dentin replacement material according to the standardized clinical protocol and manufacturer's instructions.
|
Biodentine will be used as a dentin replacement material in standardized posterior Class I cavities before placement of the definitive composite restoration.
The material will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions
|
|
Experimental: ACTIVA BioACTIVE
Participants will receive posterior Class I composite restorations incorporating ACTIVA BioACTIVE as the dentin replacement material according to the standardized clinical protocol and manufacturer's instructions.
|
ACTIVA BioACTIVE will be used as a dentin replacement material in standardized posterior Class I cavities before placement of the definitive composite restoration.
The material will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
|
|
Experimental: Glass Ionomer Cement
Participants will receive posterior Class I composite restorations incorporating conventional glass ionomer cement as the dentin replacement material according to the standardized clinical protocol and manufacturer's instructions.
|
Glass ionomer cement will be used as a dentin replacement material in standardized posterior Class I cavities before placement of the definitive composite restoration.
The material will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
|
|
Experimental: everX Posterior
Participants will receive posterior Class I composite restorations incorporating everX Posterior as the dentin replacement material according to the standardized clinical protocol and manufacturer's instructions.
|
everX Posterior will be used as a dentin replacement material in standardized posterior Class I cavities before placement of the definitive composite restoration.
The material will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
|
|
Experimental: Flowable Resin
Participants will receive posterior Class I composite restorations incorporating flowable resin composite as the dentin replacement material according to the standardized clinical protocol and manufacturer's instructions
|
Flowable resin composite will be used as a dentin replacement material in standardized posterior Class I cavities before placement of the definitive composite restoration.
The material will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
marginal adaptation
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Clinical evaluation of marginal adaptation was conducted in accordance with the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria by two calibrated examiners at baseline and after 6, 12, and 18 months.
Each restoration was assessed and categorized according to the degree of conformity with the established criteria as follows: score 1, clinically excellent; scores 2 and 3, clinically satisfactory; and scores 4 and 5, clinically inadequate.
Scores of 1-3 were considered indicative of clinical success, whereas scores of 4 or 5 were considered indicative of failure.
Visual assessment was performed under adequate illumination using a high-intensity light source and a dental magnifying loupe to facilitate accurate evaluation.
For statistical analysis, the Friedman test was used to assess within-group changes in restoration outcomes across the different follow-up periods.
The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to compare restoration outcomes among the different groups at each corresponding follow-up.
|
18 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Ahmed B, Hamama HH, Mahmoud SH. Microshear Bond Strength of Bioactive Materials to Dentin and Resin Composite. Eur J Dent. 2023 Jul;17(3):917-923. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756692. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
- Karale R, Prathima BJ, Prashanth BR, Shivaranjan NS, Jain N. The effect of bulk-fill composites: Activa and Smart Dentin Replacement on cuspal deflection in endodontically treated teeth with different access cavity designs. J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jul-Aug;25(4):375-379. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_53_22. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
- Choudhury WR, Nekkanti S. Mechanical Properties of SDR and Biodentine as Dentin Replacement Materials: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):43-48.
- Hafez ME, Abd El-Ghany AA, Taha AI, Amin A. In vitro assessment of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber reinforced resin based composite and ceramic overlays. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05480-x.
- Harp YS, Montaser MA, Zaghloul NM. Flowable fiber-reinforced versus flowable bulk-fill resin composites: Degree of conversion and microtensile bond strength to dentin in high C-factor cavities. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jun;34(4):699-706. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12901. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 12, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 27, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 29, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 8, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
August 13, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 13, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 8, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Composite Restorations
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.