- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07803159
Frailty, Immunonutrition, Surgery Type, and Biologic Recovery in Elderly Gastric Cancer
The Effects of Multidimensional Frailty Phenotypes, Immunonutritional Status, and Surgical Approach on Biological Recovery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This prospective, observational, analytical cohort study will be conducted at the General Surgery Clinic of Kocaeli City Hospital. The study will include patients aged 60 years and older who have gastric cancer and are scheduled for elective radical gastrectomy. A total of 328 patients are planned to be enrolled.
Preoperative assessment will include multidimensional frailty-related parameters, including the modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), handgrip strength, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and skeletal muscle characteristics assessed on computed tomography at the L3 level. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels will also be recorded.
Intraoperative data will include surgical approach, operative duration, and intraoperative blood loss. Postoperatively, NLR and CRP will be assessed on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5. Delirium will be evaluated using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Postoperative complications will be recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, together with hospital length of stay and handgrip strength before discharge.
The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the association between multidimensional frailty phenotypes and postoperative outcomes and biological recovery in older patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. The study will also investigate whether the surgical approach is associated with differences in biological recovery among patients with different frailty profiles.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Adem Yuksel, Assoc.Prof.
- Phone Number: 5053455259
- Email: drademyuksel@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sumru Atak, M.D.
- Phone Number: 5546664272
- Email: berilsumru@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
İZMİT
-
Kocaeli, İZMİT, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Kocaeli City Hospital
-
Contact:
- Adem Yuksel, Assoc.Prof.
- Phone Number: +90 505 345 52 59
- Email: drademyuksel@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Adem Yuksel, Assoc.Prof.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 60 years or older.
- Histopathological or endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer.
- Planned elective radical gastrectomy.
- Written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Stage IV metastatic gastric cancer.
- Requirement for emergency surgery.
- Severe neurological or psychiatric disease preventing completion of cognitive testing.
- Incomplete clinical data.
- Refusal to participate in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Laparoscopic Surgery
Patients undergoing elective radical gastrectomy through a laparoscopic approach.
The surgical approach is determined by routine clinical practice and is not assigned by the study.
|
Elective radical gastrectomy performed using a laparoscopic approach as part of routine clinical care.
The surgical approach is not assigned by the study
|
|
Open Surgery
Patients undergoing elective radical gastrectomy through an open approach.
The surgical approach is determined by routine clinical practice and is not assigned by the study.
|
Elective radical gastrectomy performed using an open approach as part of routine clinical care.
The surgical approach is not assigned by the study
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of postoperative complication
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-operative
|
According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the status of postoperative complications during index hospitalisation.
|
Up to 30 days post-operative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of Changes in the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)
Time Frame: Preoperative baseline, day 1 post-operative, day 3 post-operative, day 5 post-operative
|
Change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio from preoperative baseline to postoperative days 1, 3, and 5
|
Preoperative baseline, day 1 post-operative, day 3 post-operative, day 5 post-operative
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels during the postoperative period compared with baseline values
Time Frame: Preoperative baseline, day 1 post-operative, day 3 post-operative, day 5 post-operative
|
Change in C-reactive protein from preoperative baseline to postoperative days 1, 3, and 5.
|
Preoperative baseline, day 1 post-operative, day 3 post-operative, day 5 post-operative
|
|
Rate of postoperative delirium
Time Frame: Day 1 post-operative, day 2 post-operative, day 3 post-operative, day 4 post-operative, day 5 post-operative.
|
Occurrence of postoperative delirium assessed daily using the Confusion Assessment Method.
|
Day 1 post-operative, day 2 post-operative, day 3 post-operative, day 4 post-operative, day 5 post-operative.
|
|
Comparison of length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: From date of surgery until date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months
|
Hospital length of stay measured in days from surgery to hospital discharge.
|
From date of surgery until date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months
|
|
Comparison of changes in hand grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-discharge
|
Change in handgrip strength from the preoperative assessment to the pre-discharge assessment
|
Baseline, pre-discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Adem Yuksel, Assoc.Prof., Kocaeli City Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, Takenaga R, Devgan L, Holzmueller CG, Tian J, Fried LP. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
- Partridge JS, Harari D, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. The impact of pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing scheduled surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan;69 Suppl 1:8-16. doi: 10.1111/anae.12494.
- McIsaac DI, Taljaard M, Bryson GL, Beaule PE, Gagne S, Hamilton G, Hladkowicz E, Huang A, Joanisse JA, Lavallee LT, MacDonald D, Moloo H, Thavorn K, van Walraven C, Yang H, Forster AJ. Frailty as a Predictor of Death or New Disability After Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):283-289. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002967.
- Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
- Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2021. Gastric Cancer. 2022;25:1-21.
- Ethun CG, Bilen MA, Jani AB, et al. Frailty and cancer surgery outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2131-2139.
- Shimada H, Makizako H, Lee S, Doi T, Lee S, Tsutsumimoto K, Harada K, Hotta R, Bae S, Nakakubo S, Harada K, Suzuki T. Impact of Cognitive Frailty on Daily Activities in Older Persons. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(7):729-35. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0685-2.
- Jia G, Li K. Prognostic Nutritional Index is A Useful Predictive Marker for Morbidity and Mortality in Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer. J Inflamm Res. 2025 Aug 14;18:11021-11028. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S519037. eCollection 2025.
- Kanasaki H, Oride A, Miyazaki K. Laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients aged 65 years and older with gynecologic disease. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:678201. doi: 10.5402/2012/678201. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026-194 (Medical Ethics Committee of Yueyang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.