Microbial Adhesion and Peri-Implant Tissue Health in All-on-Four Hybrid Prostheses Supported by Zantex or Zirconia Frameworks

September 9, 2026 updated by: Maged Alameri, Kafrelsheikh University

Microbial Adhesion and Peri-Implant Tissue Health in All-on-Four Hybrid Prosthesis Supported by Zantex or Zirconia Framework. A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study compares two materials (Zantex and Zirconia) used to make fixed full-arch dental prostheses supported by four dental implants (the "All-on-Four" technique) in patients who have no natural teeth in the lower jaw. The study will evaluate how much bacteria builds up on each material and how healthy the gum tissue around the implants stays over time. Each patient will receive one type of prosthesis (either Zantex or Zirconia framework), and will be followed for three months after treatment. The goal is to help determine which material may provide better oral health outcomes for patients receiving this type of dental treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Complete edentulism remains a major clinical challenge, particularly among aging populations. All-on-Four fixed implant-supported prostheses have become a widely used solution, but the long-term success of these restorations depends heavily on the framework material used, including its resistance to microbial adhesion and its effect on peri-implant tissue health.

This randomized clinical trial compares two framework materials: Zirconia, a high-strength ceramic material, and Zantex, a fiber-reinforced polymer material, both used to fabricate mandibular hybrid prostheses supported by four implants placed following the All-on-Four protocol.

Microbial adhesion will be assessed by evaluating biofilm accumulation on the prosthesis frameworks retrieved under sterile conditions at set time intervals. Peri-implant tissue health will be evaluated clinically at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months following prosthesis delivery, using standard clinical parameters including modified plaque index, modified bleeding on probing, and probing depth.

A total of 14 patients (7 per group) will be enrolled based on sample size calculations targeting 90% statistical power.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate
      • Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, 33511
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Completely edentulous patients in the mandibular arch.
  2. Patients with a completely edentulous maxillary arch rehabilitated with a conventional complete denture.
  3. Patients with sufficient mandibular bone volume and quality to allow placement of four implants according to the All-on-Four treatment concept.
  4. Patients suitable for placement of two axial anterior implants in the canine regions and two distally tilted posterior implants anterior to the mental foramina.
  5. Patients with adequate restorative space to accommodate a full-arch hybrid prosthesis.
  6. Patients who are willing and able to maintain adequate oral hygiene and attend all scheduled follow-up appointments.
  7. Patients who are willing to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

    -

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients with systemic conditions that contraindicate implant surgery or may adversely affect osseointegration or wound healing.

    2. Patients receiving medications or undergoing treatments that significantly affect bone metabolism or healing.

    3. Patients with a history of radiotherapy involving the head and neck region that may compromise implant therapy.

    4. Patients with active or uncontrolled periodontal or oral infections. 5. Patients with inadequate mandibular bone volume or unfavorable anatomical conditions that prevent placement of four implants according to the planned All-on-Four protocol without additional augmentation procedures.

    6. Patients with severe parafunctional habits, such as uncontrolled bruxism, that may compromise the prosthetic rehabilitation.

    7. Patients unable or unwilling to maintain appropriate oral hygiene. 8. Patients unable to attend the scheduled follow-up visits. 9. Patients who decline to participate or fail to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Zirconia Framework Group
Mandibular hybrid prosthesis fabricated with Zirconia framework, supported by four implants following the All-on-Four protocol.
A metal-free zirconia ceramic framework used to fabricate a screw-retained mandibular hybrid prosthesis supported by four dental implants (All-on-Four protocol)
Experimental: Zantex Framework Group
Mandibular hybrid prosthesis fabricated with Zantex (fiber-reinforced polymer) framework, supported by four implants following the All-on-Four protocol.
A fiber-reinforced polymer (Zantex) metal-free framework used to fabricate a screw-retained mandibular hybrid prosthesis supported by four dental implants (All-on-Four protocol).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbial Adhesion on Prosthesis Framework
Time Frame: At 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after prosthesis delivery
Quantitative assessment of bacterial biofilm accumulation on the intaglio surface of the prosthesis framework, measured using microbiological culture/colony counting techniques.
At 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after prosthesis delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Plaque Index
Time Frame: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after prosthesis delivery
Modified Plaque Index (mPI) assessed using a standardized plastic periodontal probe at multiple sites around each implant, scored on a scale from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate greater plaque accumulation (worse outcome).
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after prosthesis delivery
Modified Bleeding on Probing Index (mBOP)
Time Frame: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after prosthesis delivery
Modified Bleeding on Probing (mBOP) assessed using a standardized plastic periodontal probe at multiple sites around each implant, scored on a scale from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate greater bleeding tendency (worse outcome).
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after prosthesis delivery
Probing Depth
Time Frame: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after prosthesis delivery
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after prosthesis delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 18, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe