Adult Bladder and Quality of Life Evaluation in Spina Bifida (ABLE-SB)

Spina bifida is a congenital defect of the spine where some of the spinal cord and its covering (meninges) are exposed through a gap in the lower back or sacrum; this often results in paralysis of the lower limbs. The majority of spina bifida (SB) patients also have pelvic floor dysfunction (bladder, bowel, prolapse, sexual function) because of neurologic damage to this portion of the spinal nerves, and this increases the risk of their long-term morbidity.1 These problems place a substantial burden on patients' physical health and quality of life (QoL). Serious urological complications, such as urosepsis, skin breakdown, and renal failure, can occur in this patient population due to bladder dysfunction.2 Approximately 50% of young adults with SB have renal dysfunction3, 50% have urinary incontinence4, and they are nine times more likely to present with urinary tract infections5. The "gold standard" bladder management strategy when a person with SB is unable to void spontaneously is to perform clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Alternatives to CIC include spontaneous voiding (if possible), incontinence products, an indwelling catheter (IDC), or reconstructive surgery (to create a urinary diversion or to enable CIC). However, IDC and surgery have increased risks of specific complications, including the risk of bladder cancer, urethral damage, urinary infections, and surgical morbidity.6 People with SB usually discuss bladder management options with their urologist, however they may prioritize a variety of factors around bladder management that directly affect their QOL, and these may not be as apparent to urologists. This is further complicated when patients reach adolescence and young adulthood; at this age they transition from pediatric to adult care providers, all while transitioning in other areas of their life (such as increasing responsibility, cognitive growth, and a wish for more independence). These factors may all impact thoughts about bladder management. Few studies have addressed QoL in relation to different bladder/bowel management methods in this SB age group, and most have not considered things like health literacy and cognitive function.

1. Wiener JS, Suson KD, Castillo J, Routh JC, Tanaka ST, Liu T, Ward EA, Thibadeau JK, Joseph DB, Registry NSBP. Bladder Management and Continence Outcomes in Adults with Spina Bifida: Results from the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry, 2009 to 2015. The Journal of urology 2018;200:187-94.
2. Nooten FE van, Winnette R, Stein R, Kissner M, Schröder A, Jöckel M, Raluy-Callado M, Lambrelli D, Meinhardt M, Wasiak R. Resource utilization and productivity loss in persons with spina bifida-an observational study of patients in a tertiary urology clinic in Germany. European journal of neurology : the official journal of the European Federation of Neurological Societies 2015;22:53-8.
3. Malakounides G, Lee F, Murphy F, Boddy S-A. Single centre experience: long term outcomes in spina bifida patients. Journal of Pediatric Urology 2013;9:585-9.
4. Verhoef M, Lurvink M, Barf HA, Post MWM, Asbeck FWA van, Gooskens RHJM, Prevo AJH. High prevalence of incontinence among young adults with spina bifida: description, prediction and problem perception. Spinal Cord 2005;43:331-40.
5. Tradewell M, Pariser JJ, Nimeh T, Elliott SP, Group NBR. Systematic review and practice policy statements on urinary tract infection prevention in adults with spina bifida. Translational Andrology and Urology 2018;7:S205-19.
6. Snow-Lisy DC, Yerkes EB, Cheng EY. Update on Urological Management of Spina Bifida from Prenatal Diagnosis to Adulthood. The Journal of urology 2015;194:288-96.