Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Costs and Effects of Three Modes for Disease Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in General Practice

21. november 2011 opdateret af: E. Bischoff, Radboud University Medical Center

Costs and Effects of Three Modes for Disease Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in General Practice. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Regular Practice Nurse Review, Self-management Education and Usual Care

In this randomized controlled trial, three contemporary modes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management in Dutch general practices are compared for costs and effects:

  • usual general practitioner (GP) care (at patient's initiative);
  • regular practice nurse review; and
  • integrated self-management education.

All three interventions are based on existing guidelines, materials, and field experiences.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Considering the ageing of the Dutch population and the current and increasing shortage of general practitioners (GPs), the capacity of primary healthcare is a major and growing concern. Delegation of care normally provided by GPs with care provided by trained practice nurses is now rapidly emerging for patients with chronic respiratory disease, i.e. asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, most general practices still provide care at initiative of the patient self, because of the lack in scientific evidence and the costs of implementing a regular care structure. Self-care by patients may be an alternative to alleviate the growing load on primary health care.

The following two main research questions are addressed in this study.

  • Does an integrated self-management education intervention for patients with COPD in general practice contribute to attaining long-term treatment targets, compared to regular monitoring by a practice nurse and usual GP care?
  • What is the cost-effectiveness of an integrated self-management education intervention for patients with COPD, compared to regular monitoring by a practice nurse and usual GP care?

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

165

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Nijmegen, Holland, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University, Department of General Medicine

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

35 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Registered in one of the general practices participating in the study
  • Diagnosis of COPD, with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseases (GOLD) stage I, II or III
  • Age ≥35 years
  • Willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Very poor prognosis with regard to respiratory condition (GOLD stage IV)
  • Severe co-morbid conditions with a reduced life expectancy
  • Unable to communicate in the Dutch language
  • Objections to one or more of the disease management modes in the study

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: usual care
usual care, i.e. COPD care at patient's own initiative, mostly for medical help during exacerbations
care at initiative of the patient (usual GP care)
Eksperimentel: monitoring controls
regular COPD care (monitoring) provided by practice nurse according to current COPD guidelines
protocol based on existing Guidelines: Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)
Eksperimentel: self-management
disease specific self-management program 'Living Well with COPD'
disease specific self-management program 'Living Well with COPD', developed in Montreal, Canada

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
Tidsramme: two years
two years

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
the number of exacerbations
Tidsramme: two years
two years
generic quality of life
Tidsramme: two years
two years
decline post- and pre-bronchodilator (BD) lung function indices
Tidsramme: two years
two years
level of respiratory symptoms
Tidsramme: two years
two years
satisfaction with the health care received
Tidsramme: two years
two years
compliance with (non-) pharmaceutical treatment
Tidsramme: two years
two years
direct and indirect medical costs
Tidsramme: two years
two years
COPD related self-efficacy
Tidsramme: two years
two years
COPD coping styles
Tidsramme: two years
two years

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Studiestol: Chris van Weel, FRCP, Department of General Practice, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Studieleder: Tjard Schermer, PhD, Department of General Practice, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Ledende efterforsker: Erik Bischoff, MD, Department of General Practice, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. januar 2005

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. december 2008

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. december 2008

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

9. august 2005

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

9. august 2005

Først opslået (Skøn)

10. august 2005

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

22. november 2011

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

21. november 2011

Sidst verificeret

1. november 2011

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • MONC95582
  • ZonMw grant: 945.04.230 (Andet bevillings-/finansieringsnummer: ZonMw)
  • Picasso grant: 005.2004 (Andet bevillings-/finansieringsnummer: Picasso)
  • CMO: 2004/249 (Anden identifikator: Medical Ethics Committee)

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner