- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT00146848
PEGASUS CRT Study: Atrial Support Study in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (PEGASUS CRT)
20. december 2011 opdateret af: Boston Scientific Corporation
Pacing Evaluation - Atrial Support Study in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
This study will look at different pacing modes (how a device is programmed to pace one's heart), and how these modes may assist in one's daily activities and how one is feeling.
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Betingelser
Detaljeret beskrivelse
PEGASUS CRT is a multicenter trial that will assess the effect of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device programmed to DDD-70 or DDDR-40 compared to a CRT device programmed to DDD-40 in heart failure patients.
The effect of atrial support pacing in heart failure patients will be assessed using a clinical composite rating.
A sub-study will evaluate the effect pacing mode has on exercise capacity in this heart failure population.
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
1742
Fase
- Fase 4
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, Forenede Stater, 44195
- The Cleveland Clinic Hospital
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ingen
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who meet current indications for the CONTAK RENEWAL® family of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices or future Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Guidant CRT-D devices
- Patients who sign and date a Patient Informed Consent at, or prior to, the implant visit
- Patients who are in sinus rhythm at the time of implant
- Patients who remain in the clinical care of the enrolling physician in approved centers
- Patients who are on optimal pharmacologic therapy or who have developed a recent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) indication that necessitates ICD therapy concurrent with the optimization of pharmacologic therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients whose medical condition is expected to preclude the use of the protocol-required pacing mode (dual chamber pacing [DDD or DDDR]) and respective lower rate limits
- Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- Patients who are in complete heart block
- Patients who have previously had a pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device
- Patients whose life expectancy is less than 12 months due to other medical conditions
- Patients who are expected to receive a heart transplant during the duration of the study
- Patients who have other cardiac surgeries or procedures planned but not yet performed
- Patients who currently have or who are likely to receive a tricuspid valve prosthesis
- Patients who are currently enrolled in another investigational study or registry that would directly impact the treatment or outcome of the current study.
- Patients who are younger than 18 years of age
- Patients who are mentally incompetent and cannot sign a Patient Informed Consent form or comply with the study
- Patients who are or become pregnant
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Enkelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Aktiv komparator: DDD-40
DDD-40 for this trial is the comparator arm.
Even though patients are receiving a CRT-D device, atrial support pacing in this arm will be limited as the device will not pace unless the rate falls below 40 bpm.
|
All subjects in this trial receive the same device.
For the purpose of this trial, "intervention" is programming mode and lower rate limit to deliver atrial support pacing in the two treatment arms, while the control arm will receive programming where limited atrial support pacing is delivered.
DDD-70 and DDDR-40 are the treatment arms programmed to receive atrial support pacing and will be compared to the DDD-40 arm.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: DDDR-40
DDDR-40 programming will initiate atrial support pacing if the rate falls below 40 bpm or if atrial support is needed in response to increased activity.
|
All subjects in this trial receive the same device.
For the purpose of this trial, "intervention" is programming mode and lower rate limit to deliver atrial support pacing in the two treatment arms, while the control arm will receive programming where limited atrial support pacing is delivered.
DDD-70 and DDDR-40 are the treatment arms programmed to receive atrial support pacing and will be compared to the DDD-40 arm.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: DDD-70
Atrial support pacing in this arm will be delivered when the rate falls below 70 bpm.
|
All subjects in this trial receive the same device.
For the purpose of this trial, "intervention" is programming mode and lower rate limit to deliver atrial support pacing in the two treatment arms, while the control arm will receive programming where limited atrial support pacing is delivered.
DDD-70 and DDDR-40 are the treatment arms programmed to receive atrial support pacing and will be compared to the DDD-40 arm.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Composite Score
Tidsramme: From randomization (6-weeks) through 12-month visit
|
The primary outcome measure classified patients as improved, unchanged or worsened, based on a 4 components clinical composite score using the following four components: death, heart failure hospitalization, New York Heart Association [NYHA] class, patient's Global Assessment rating.
Best value is improved, whereas worst value is worsened.
|
From randomization (6-weeks) through 12-month visit
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life
Tidsramme: From randomization (6-weeks) through 12-month visit
|
Quality of Life as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionniare for those patients with paired data at 6 weeks and 12 months.
This score is on a scale of 0(best)- 105(worst).
A negative change denotes improvement.
|
From randomization (6-weeks) through 12-month visit
|
|
Change in Self Assessed Physical Activity
Tidsramme: From randomization (6-weeks) through 12-month visit
|
Physical activity was assessed using the Physical Activity Scale of the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire for those patients with paired data available at the 6 week and 12 month visits.
The PASE is designed to assess physical activity in older persons.
The total PASE score was computed by multiplying the amount of time spent in each activity (hours/week) or participation (yes/no) in an activity by empirically derived item weights and summing over all activities.
PASE scores for this study ranged from 0 to 756 with higher scores indicating more physical activity.
|
From randomization (6-weeks) through 12-month visit
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: David O. Martin, MD, MPH, The Cleveland Clinic
- Ledende efterforsker: John Day, Utah Heart Clinic, LDS Hospital
Publikationer og nyttige links
Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.
Generelle publikationer
- Martin DO, Stolen KQ, Brown S, Yu Y, Christie C, Doshi SK, Smith JM, Gold MR, Day JD. Pacing Evaluation-Atrial SUpport Study in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (PEGASUS CRT): design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2007 Jan;153(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.10.013.
- Martin DO, Day JD, Lai PY, Murphy AL, Nayak HM, Villareal RP, Weiner S, Kraus SM, Stolen KQ, Gold MR. Atrial support pacing in heart failure: results from the multicenter PEGASUS CRT trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;23(12):1317-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02402.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart
1. december 2004
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
1. januar 2009
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
1. februar 2009
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
2. september 2005
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
6. september 2005
Først opslået (Skøn)
7. september 2005
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)
28. december 2011
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
20. december 2011
Sidst verificeret
1. december 2011
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- CR-CA-100604-H
- PEGASUS
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .