Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions of Patients With Stroke.

7. september 2017 opdateret af: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions of Patients With Stroke: An Evidence of Clinical and Kinematic Studies.

The fundamental goals of early rehabilitation for patients with stroke are: optimizing motor function within each patient's prognostic potential, preventing the development of secondary conditions that impact life-long health, and promoting patient's participation in their lives. In addition to employ clinical measures after treatment, usual outcome measures employed in the intervention studies included movement kinematics (spatio-temporal characteristics of movements). Recent reports have suggested repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and BoNTA (BoNTA) improved motor function in patients with stroke. A novel rTMS paradigm, theta burst stimulation (TBS), including intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS), that modulates human cortical excitability differently. However, there is lack of literatures in verifying the treatment effect by the integration of clinical and kinematic analysis. Until now, there are no conclusive results regarding optimal rTMS protocol, such as stimulating pattern and for patients with stroke. Additionally, few studies investigate the possible clinical characteristics of patients with stroke that may influence the effects of various treatment protocols proposed in this project.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

The research program aims at studying patients with stroke the immediate and maintaining effects of new upper-extremity (UE) treatment protocols after brain damage and identifying the possible mechanisms underlying treatment-induced changes in patients with stroke. This research will study new treatment approaches that have been formulated based on principles of integrated central modulation (rTMS) and peripheral modification techniques (BoNTA).

  1. To compare the movement functions and motor control in patients with stroke of different motor severities.
  2. To investigate the immediate and maintaining effects of different protocols in the treatment of upper limb functions.
  3. To evaluate motor control and clinical outcomes after different treatment approaches applied in the UE training of patients with stroke. The treatment approaches to be studied will include different protocols. We hypothesize that there will be improvements in movement performance after the treatment and the level of post-treatment performance will differ among the treatments through different reorganization patterns.

    3.1 To compare the motor control and clinical outcomes after different treatment approaches.

    3.2 To identify the optimal treatment protocol for patients with stroke.

  4. To investigate the possible predictors of treatment outcome associated with motor severity, movement and participation for each type of treatments. The possible predictors will include brain lesions, and severity. We hypothesize that the proposed prognostic factors will predict treatment outcomes.
  5. To analyze the association between motor reorganization measured by kinematic study and behavioral improvement in motor severity, movement and participation measured by clinical tools.

Treating motor dysfunction in patients with stroke requires an understanding of the mechanism underlying motor control. Recent reports have suggested BoNTA and rTMS improved motor function in patients with various disorders. However, there are few researches in identifying the optimal rTMS protocol in the treatment of upper limb dysfunctions in patients with stroke. There is lack of literatures in verifying the treatment effect by movement control studies. The current research will offer valuable kinematic data that support neural-motor models proposed to account for motor control problems in these patients. More important, we will identify the new protocol in the treatment of upper limb dysfunctions in patients with stroke through integration of clinical and kinematic measures. We will identify clinical predictors influencing the outcome for different treatment approaches, and analyze the association between motor control and clinical measures involving motor severity, movement and participation. We believe the results of this study will refine services and supports for patients with stroke to meet these goals. This study may potentially provide directions in kinematic measures for future studies on patients with stroke.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

80

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

20 år til 80 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 20-80 y/o
  • patients with 1st onset cerebral stroke.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brain stem or cerebellar stroke
  • Contraindication to MRI, such as metallic implant
  • Contraindication to BoNTA, such as poor controlled epilepsy
  • History of psychiatric disease
  • Received BoNTA injection or surgery in recent six months
  • Severe psychological impairments, such as mental retardation, autism, or severe Communication problems
  • Progressive disorders, such as neurodegenerative disease
  • Active medical disease, such as infection

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Dobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: iTBS gruppe
Ved intermitterende theta-burst-stimulering (iTBS-gruppe) modtog de iTBS (80 % af aktiv motorisk tærskel) på den berørte halvkugle.
In intermittent theta burst stimulation pattern (iTBS) will intermittently give a 2 s train of TBS every 10s for a total of 20 times (low pulse: 600 pulses in total)
Eksperimentel: cTBS gruppe
Ved kontinuerlig theta-burst-stimulering (cTBS-gruppe) modtog de cTBS (80 % af aktiv motorisk tærskel) på upåvirket halvkugle.
In continuous burst stimulation pattern (cTBS) will intermittently give a cTBS treatment consists of a continuous train of TBS for 40 seconds(low pulse: 600 pulses in total).
Andre navne:
  • continuous burst stimulation
Sham-komparator: falsk TBS-gruppe
I sham theta burst stimulation (sham TBS gruppe) modtog de sham TBS stimulering.
In sham burst stimulation pattern (sham TBS) will intermittently give a sham TBS treatment consists of a continuous train of TBS for 40 seconds(almost no pulse: 600 pulses in total).

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change from baseline of Kinematic analysis after 2 weeks treatment and 3 months , 12 months follow up.
Tidsramme: baseline, after treatment, 3 months , 6 months
Kinematic analysis for upper limb analysis.
baseline, after treatment, 3 months , 6 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. december 2012

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. juni 2017

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. juni 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

18. september 2013

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

18. september 2013

Først opslået (Skøn)

20. september 2013

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

11. september 2017

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

7. september 2017

Sidst verificeret

1. september 2016

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Cerebral vaskulær ulykke

Kliniske forsøg med intermittent theta burst stimulation

Abonner